This article discusses the fundamental principles of auditing professional practice and the ethical standards that auditors must adhere to. It covers various scenarios and situations that may create threats to compliance with fundamental principles and the impact they may have on auditor's independence.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Auditing professional practice Name of the student Name of the university Student ID Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Table of Contents Question 1..................................................................................................................................2 Answer a.................................................................................................................................2 Answer b................................................................................................................................2 Answer c.................................................................................................................................3 Answer d................................................................................................................................4 Answer e.................................................................................................................................4 Answer f.................................................................................................................................5 Question 2..................................................................................................................................6 Situation 1..............................................................................................................................6 Situation 2..............................................................................................................................7 Reference....................................................................................................................................8
2AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Question 1 Answer a An auditor is not supposed to engage himself in any activity or any business that may impair his integrity, good reputation or objectivity of the profession as it will not be compatible with fundamental principles. Integrity is being honest and straightforward with regard to all business and professional relationships. Further, to maintain the independence of the auditor he shall not involve in any activity that may compromise his professional judgement and may disallow him to act with integrity (Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board 2017). In the given case, if Jenny Wang, senior auditor of Panania Cars Pty Ltd accepts the 20% discount on purchasing car from the company it may impair his integrity which in turn, may have an impact on his audit opinion. Hence, to maintain his good reputation and independency in professional aspect he shall not accept the offer otherwise it will go against the ethical principle of APES 110. Answer b As per Section 260 of APES 110, significance and existence of the threat depends on intent, value and nature of offer. If the gifts offered is informed and reasonable taking into consideration all the circumstances and facts and considering inconsequential and trivial the auditor may conclude that the offer is under nor business course. The auditor shall further ensure thatthe offer will not have any impacton his decisionmaking or gathering information (George, Jones and Harvey 2014). Under such circumstances, the auditor may conclude that any compliance threat with regard to fundamental principles will be at acceptable level. In the given case, it can be concluded that Christmas gift provided by Lancom Cosmetics amounting to $ 350 to its auditor Katrina Wearne will not create any
3AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE compliance threat if it does not have any impact on decision making. Hence, it will not breach the ethical principle of APES 110. Answer c Principle of due care and professional competence imposes the below mentioned obligations on auditor – Act diligentlyas per the applicableprofessionaland technicalstandardswhile delivering professional services and Maintaining professional skill and knowledge at required level for assuring that the employers or clients receive professional competent services (Arenset al. 2013). For maintainingprofessionalcompetencethe memberin the public practiceis required to have continuous understanding and awareness regarding relevant business, professional and technical developments. It enables the member in the public practice to maintain and develop capabilities that will enable him to perform within professional environment competently. Fundamental principle of the professional competence obliges the auditor to offer only the services those he is competent to carry out. Therefore, before accepting any particular engagement the member in the public practice shall determine whethertheacceptanceoftheengagementwillcreatethreatstothecomplianceof fundamental principle. For instance, it will generate self-interest threat to due care and professional competence if the engagement team are not competent to perform the activities requiredforcarryingoutengagementproperly(AccountingProfessionalandEthical Standards Board (APESB 2017). Hence, in the given case if D.Maron, the chartered accountant should not have accepted the engagement as he does not have any knowledge and experience regarding the installation of computer system. Acceptance of the engagement will violate the ethical principle under APES 110.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Answer d To respect and maintain confidentiality with regard to the information gathered from business relationship and professional relationships, the member is not allowed to disclose the information to 3rdparties without specific and proper authority from the client. Only exception is that there is professional or legal duty or right to disclose the information. Further, the information shall not be used for personal advantages or advantages of third parties. The member is also required to comply with confidentiality principle even after end of the relationship between the client and member (Everett and Tremblay 2014). In the given case, for maintaining the quality assurance 6 accounting firms are taking part in review program for working papers. Under the program each firm will review working papers of any other firm and will discuss the weaknesses and strengths of audit. However, using the client’s businessinformationwithoutpriorapprovalfromthemwillhaveimpactonthe confidentiality. Therefore, it will violate the APES 110 ethical principle. Answer e As per Section 220 of APES 110, any member under public practice shall apply reasonable steps for identifying circumstances that may lead to interest conflict. Such scenarios may lead to compliance threat to comply with fundamental principles. For instance, objectivity threat may be created when the member directly competes with the client or has joint venture with the client’s major competitor. Further, the member under public practice must evaluate impact of threat and shall apply appropriate safeguards for eliminating threat or reduce the threat to acceptable level. In the given case, the chartered accountant, Bill Holland sets up the fire and casualty insurance agency apart from tax and audit services (Al Momamani 2013). Though he does not uses his own name it will create threat to ethical principle of APES 110 as he regularly requests his manager to check the adequacy of client’s insurance. Further, it will createself-interest threat to the compliance with regard to
5AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE professional behaviour principle as services and products of the the auditor marketed in inconsistent manner. Answer f Self-interest threat will be created if the auditor in addition to regular audit services delivers non-audit services including bookkeeping services, advisory services to company’s management or tax services to the same client. Offering non-audit services creates threat to independency of the auditor. Self-interest threat generated from offering non-audit services will be so significant that any kind of safeguards will be unable to reduce the threat to acceptable level. Further, the member under public practice must take reasonable steps for identifying the scenarios that may pose interest conflict (Kung and Li Huang 2013). In the given scenario, public accountant Emma Lawrence along with regular audit services offers different non-audit services like bookkeeping services, advisory services to management or tax services to the same client. Therefore, providing non-audit services along with audit services will breach the ethical principle of APES 110.
6AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Question 2 Situation 1 If the audit firm assumes the responsibility of the client’s management it would create intimidation threat and the impact will be so significant that any safeguard will not be able to reduce threats to the acceptable level. For instance, deciding upon which recommendation shall be implemented by the firm and which recommendation will create familiarity threat or intimidation threat. Further, assuming regarding management’s responsibility will create familiarity threat as the firm will be aligned with interest and views of the management too closely. Thus, the audit firm must not assume the responsibility of management for the audit client. Further, to avoid the risk associated with assumption of management’s responsibility while offering non-assurance services to the audit client, the audit firm must be satisfied that management is answerable for taking significant decisions and judgements (Naslmosavi, SofianandSaat2013).Further,itshallbeevaluatedthatthemanagement’sproper responsibility has been generated through analysis of service results. It will reduce the firm’s risk owing to any significant decision made based on significant judgements or any decision made on behalf of the client management. Further, the risk can be reduced while the audit firmprovidestheclientanopportunitytomakedecisionsandjudgementsbasedon transparent analysis and issues presentation. Further the audit engagement states the reasonable assurance under which the audit expresses his opinion regarding the true and fair presentation of the company’s financial statement. Further, the auditor is responsible for expressing his opinion whether the financial statements are prepared in compliance with the applicable framework for financial reporting that includes that the engagement is conducted as per the auditing and assurance standards (Guénin-Paracini, Malsch and Tremblay 2014). Hence, if the auditor involves himself in
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE recommending and assuming the responsibility of the client’s management it would create intimidation threat. Situation 2 Self interest threat will be created if the fees dues from the audit client is overdue for long period, particularly when the significant part of the fees are unpaid before issuance of the next years audit report. Generally, the client is required to pay the audit fees before issuance of the report. Therefore, if the fees remain unpaid it will attract self-interest threat that will have adverse impact on the independence of the auditor. Further, when the fees from the client represent big proportion that is more than 15% of total fees of the client firm dependence on the client and the concern regarding losing client will create self-interest threat which in turn will have adverse impact on auditor’s independence (Al Nawaiseh and Alnawaiseh 2015). Any member in the public practice may get offer for hospitality and gifts from the audit client. This kind of offers will create threats with regard to compliance of fundamental principles. Therefore, if John accepts the offer of free trip to Europe it will attract self-interest threat which in turn will have adverse impact on the auditor’s independence (Tepalagul and Lin 2015). Inventories shall be valued at cost or market value whichever is lower. If the company does not consider reduction in the fair value while valuing the inventory it will violate the requirement of AASB (Aasb.gov.au 2017). Further, it has material impact on financial statement of the company. Hence, if the auditor ignores the fact it will attract self-interest threat which in turn will have adverse impact on auditor’s independence.
8AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Reference Aasb.gov.au. 2017. AustralianAccounting StandardsBoard (AASB) - Home. [online] Available at: http://www.aasb.gov.au/ [Accessed 12 Aug. 2018]. APESB, 2017.Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.Accounting Professional & EthicalStandardsBoard.[online]Availableat: http://www.apesb.org.au/uploads/standards/superseded_pronouncements/ 21092016145901_APES_110.pdf [Accessed 12 Aug. 2018]. Al Momamani, M.A., 2013. The effect of auditors' ethics on their detection of creative accountingpractices:Afieldstudy.InternationalJournalofBusinessand Management,8(13), p.118. Al Nawaiseh, M.A.L. and Alnawaiseh, M., 2015. The Effects of the Threats on the Auditor’s Independence.International Business Research,8(8), p.141. Arens, A.A., Best, P., Shailer, G. and Fiedler, B., 2013.Auditing, Assurance Services and Ethics in Australia. Pearson Higher Education AU. Everett, J. and Tremblay, M.S., 2014. Ethics and internal audit: Moral will and moral skill in a heteronomous field.Critical Perspectives on Accounting,25(3), pp.181-196. George, G., Jones, A. and Harvey, J., 2014. Analysis of the language used within codes of ethical conduct.Journal of Academic and Business Ethics,8, p.1. Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B. and Tremblay, M.S., 2014. On the operational reality of auditors'independence:Lessonsfromthefield.Auditing:AJournalofPractice& Theory,34(2), pp.201-236.
9AUDITING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Kung,F.H.andLiHuang,C.,2013.Auditors'moralphilosophiesandethical beliefs.Management Decision,51(3), pp.479-500. Naslmosavi, S., Sofian, S. and Saat, M.B.M., 2013. The effect of audit firm size on independent auditor’s opinion: Conceptual framework.Asian Social Science,9(9), p.243. Tepalagul, N. and Lin, L., 2015. Auditor independence and audit quality: A literature review.Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,30(1), pp.101-121.