Auditing of Vodafone Australia: Key Business Risks and Risk of Material Misstatement

Verified

Added on  2023/06/08

|9
|1456
|442
AI Summary
This article discusses the key business risks and risk of material misstatement in the auditing of Vodafone Australia. It also covers the use of analytical procedures in auditing and the importance of carrying out necessary procedures to express an appropriate opinion on the financial statements of the company.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Running head: AUDITING
Auditing
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
1
AUDITING
Contents
Key business risk:............................................................................................................................2
Risk of material misstatement:........................................................................................................3
Conclusion:......................................................................................................................................6
References:......................................................................................................................................7
Document Page
2
AUDITING
In order to conduct audit of an entity efficiently, it is important to have proper
understanding and knowledge about the entity and its environment. Only with proper knowledge
and understanding about the entity and its environment it would be possible to discharge the
responsibilities of an auditor towards the audit of the entity (Cao, Chychyla and Stewart, 2015).
Vodafone PLC is one of the biggest telecommunication companies in the world and operates in
the country as Vodafone Australia. The company has its shares listed in the Australian Securities
Exchange (ASX). The company provides telecommunication services in the country for number
of years now. Over the years the company has made a significant impact on the
telecommunication industry in the country. In order to understand the inhere
Key business risk:
The company operates in an extremely competitive telecommunication industry. The key
business risks of the company are as following:
Ever increasing competition: The competition in telecommunication industry in Australia is
immense. Over the last decade the industry has seen huge increase in number of firms. Vodafone
must strategically handle competition to keep its market share intact.
Customer preference: With increasing competition, the business is facing the challenge of ever
changing customer preferences in terms of services. To meet the expectation of the customers the
company must continuously improve its services (Jans, Alles and Vasarhelyi, 2014).
Dwindling profit margin: The profit margins in the business is decreasing with passing of each
year due to increase in cost of operations and reduction in revenue.
Document Page
3
AUDITING
The auditors of the company in his report should state about the quality of financial statements of
the company. The financial reports should correctly show the combined effects of all financial
transactions on the performance and position of the company. Auditor must state whether the
financial reports are materially misstated or not (Chan and Vasarhelyi, 2018).
Risk of material misstatement:
Inherent risk:
The risk of material misstatement in financial statements due to factor other than control
failure. The limitations in accounting principles and policies, lack of uniformity in accounting
standards, measurement and valuation techniques used by the organization are the main
contributory factors to the inherent risk of material misstatement. Vodafone however, has
followed IFRSs properly to reduce the inherent risk to an acceptable level.
Control risk:
The internal controls and securities within the company is very strong and effective. A
detailed evaluation of these controls have showed that the company conducts periodic review of
its financial and accounting controls to ensure that the transactions are correctly recorded and
reported in the financial statements.
In order to assess the risk of material misstatement in financial statements, analytical
procedures can be used by an auditor. Analytical procedures include but not limited to ratio
analysis on financial items disclosed in financial statements.
VODAFONE GROUP PLC
All amounts are in EUR millions 2015-03 2016-03 2017-03 2018-03

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
4
AUDITING
Revenue 57,742.
00
51,955.
00
47,631.
00
46,571.
00
Cost of revenue 42,229.
00
38,593.
00
34,576.
00
32,771.
00
Gross profit 15,513.
00
13,363.
00
13,055.
00
13,800.
00
Gross profit ratio 26.
87
25.
72
27.
41
29.
63
Operating profit ratio
Revenue 57,742.
00
51,955.
00
47,631.
00
46,571.
00
Operating income 2,932.
00
2,356.
00
3,678.
00
4,358.
00
Operating profit ratio 5.
08
4.
53
7.
72
9.
36
Net income ratio
Revenue 57,742. 51,955. 47,631. 46,571.
Document Page
5
AUDITING
00 00 00 00
Net income from continuing operations 8,013.
00
(4,841.0
0)
(1,972.0
0)
4,757.
00
Net income ratio 13.
88
(9.
32)
(4.
14)
10.
21
The extract used from income statement of the company to calculate profitability ratios clearly
indicate that the revenue of the company is on the decline. In addition the profitability ratios of
the company shows that despite the reduction in overall revenue, the company has been able to
earn significantly higher profits in 2018. Gross profit ratio of 29.63% in 2018 is highest in last
four years. Despite a reduction of 5,384 million in gross revenue of the company in 2018 from
2016 the net income of the company has increased by €9,598 million.Net profit ratio of 2018 has
increased to 10.21% as opposed to the negative net income ratio of 9.32% in 2016. Such
significant difference must be evaluated by the auditor to check whether financial statements are
materially misstated (Yoon, Hoogduin and Zhang 2015).
VODAFONE GROUP PLC
All amounts are in EUR
millions
2015-03 2016-03 2017-03 2018-03
Current ratio
Total current assets 27,139. 35,687. 42,737. 37,951.
Document Page
6
AUDITING
00 00 00 00
Total current liabilities 39,514.
00
42,346.
00
42,389.
00
39,024.
00
Current ratio 0.
69
0.
84
1.
01
0.
97
Acid test ratio
Total current assets less
inventories
26,480.
00
34,971.
00
42,161.
00
37,370.
00
Total current liabilities 39,514.
00
42,346.
00
42,389.
00
39,024.
00
Acid test ratio 0.
67
0.
83
0.
99
0.
96
Another important aspect of the analytical procedure is the current and acid test ratio.
Both these ratios have improved over the last 4 years despite lack of profits in 2016 and 2017.
From 0.69: 1 in 2015 the current ratio of the company improved to 0.84: 1 and 1.01: 1 in 2016
and 2017 respectively (Plumlee, Rixom and Rosman 2014). Though the inherent and control risk
of the company have been assessed low still the auditor should carry out necessary substantive

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
7
AUDITING
procedures to keep the detection risk as low as possible to collect necessary audit evidence to
support his opinion on the financial reports of the company.
Conclusion:
Thus, the auditor must use extensive audit procedures on items of revenue, expenditures,
assets and liabilities to reduce the overall audit risk to an acceptable level. The overall audit risk
must be within acceptable limits to conduct the audit of the company effectively. However,
based on the results of analytical procedures it is important to carry out all necessary procedures
to express an appropriate opinion on the financial statements of the company (Appelbaum,
Kogan and Vasarhelyi, 2017).
Document Page
8
AUDITING
References:
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A. and Vasarhelyi, M.A., 2017. Big Data and analytics in the modern
audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), pp.1-27.
Cao, M., Chychyla, R. and Stewart, T., 2015. Big Data analytics in financial statement
audits. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), pp.423-429. [Online] Available from:
http://www.aaajournals.org/doi/abs/10.2308/acch-51068?code=aaan-site [Accessed 30
September 2018]
Chan, D.Y. and Vasarhelyi, M.A., 2018. Innovation and practice of continuous auditing.
In Continuous Auditing: Theory and Application (pp. 271-283). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Jans, M., Alles, M.G. and Vasarhelyi, M.A., 2014. A field study on the use of process mining of
event logs as an analytical procedure in auditing. The Accounting Review, 89(5), pp.1751-1773.
[Online] Available from: http://www.aaajournals.org/doi/abs/10.2308/accr-50807?code=aaan-
site [Accessed 30 September 2018]
Plumlee, R.D., Rixom, B.A. and Rosman, A.J., 2014. Training auditors to perform analytical
procedures using metacognitive skills. The Accounting Review, 90(1), pp.351-369.
Yoon, K., Hoogduin, L. and Zhang, L., 2015. Big Data as complementary audit
evidence. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), pp.431-438.
1 out of 9
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]