Augmented Essay on the Jury System
6 Pages1412 Words528 Views
Added on 2019-10-16
Augmented Essay on the Jury System
Added on 2019-10-16
ShareRelated Documents
Augmented essay on the jury system
IntroductionIn this present paper, we will discuss the augmented essay on the topic ‘jury system provides the greater chance of a fair result in court’. The main argument is that the jury system has less chance of a fair result in court. The jury system consists of twelve members who are summoned for criminal trials in the crown court, and the offence is indictable that has been sent to the crowncourt for the examination which is being done by magistrates. The minimum member is nine in which the majority allowed 11-1, 9-1, 10-2 and 10-1 in the crown court. In the high court, the majority allows 11-1, 10-2, 10-1 ad 9-1. In the country court, the eight members are required, and minimum members are seven in which the majority allows 7-1. In coroner's court, the total members require seven and maximum eleven (Cockburn et al., 2014). Counter argumentThe main argument is that the jury system has less chance of fair results in courts because the jury members can make a decision in favour of the criminal party by taking a bribe. On acquittal there may be no retrial and believe of a jury is instant which results in wrongful acquittals. The main reason for supporting the argument is due to no enquiry into the deliberation of the jury after verdict even the racial is alleged by the jurors. The bias can be done by the jury because there is no investigation due to which the chances of fair results are very low. The insufficient intellect by the jurors and they dont follow the complicated tax and fraud issues (Allen-Bell et al., 2015). The jury system is inconsistent throughout the country due to which the unfair results can be done by the jurors according to the law of another country. The role of jury members is symbolic because to public involvement due to which the chances of fair results are very low.
The members of the jury can have the convictions string which is not serious for disqualifying the jurors and disqualifies jurors can be enter by finding some way which may raise the issues of unfair results. The financial loss and inconvenience can be made to the jurors. The process of thejury system is very slow due to which the innocent can suffer a lot at the time of proceedings. The lack of research by the jurors in the case defies assessment which may results into unfair results by the jury system.The vetting of a jury is the principle of random selection due to which the selection of jury members can be made on the basis of bias which reduces the chances of fair results in the criminal cases. The expenses of jury trial are very high and if the justified results have not been made by the jury members than the expenses go in vain. The system can be manipulated by the defendants due to whom the chances of fair results are very low. The innocents could be punished if the jury made a decision on the basis of bias. The verdict series of the miscarriage of justice can be wrongly returned by the juries which undermine the confidence (Fukurai et al., 2014). The quick verdict may be tempted by the jurors in order to finish the case as soon as possible. The law of jury secrecy can allow the innocent to become convict rather than making the investigation of case in-depth which allows rescuing the innocent from conviction. The jurorscan be affected by the horrific cases which may result in unfair results. The assessment of horrifying evidence may impact on the life of jurors. In the justice system of criminals, the existence of juries may distract the jurors from actual problems which show that the functioning of CJ system is more effective than the jury system. The jury trial is not provided in some serious cases such as the case of drink and drive which may results into the unfair results (Yu et al., 2014). The burden of proofs may not be understood by the juries due to which unfair results can be made by the jurors.
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Augmented essay on the jury system which provides the greater chance of a fair result in courtlg...
|6
|1405
|209
R. v. Williams [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128 - Legal Case Summarylg...
|4
|788
|70
Double Jeopardy Rule - Doclg...
|7
|1103
|476
Journal of Media Law and Ethics -lg...
|4
|740
|15
The Criminal Justice System and Our Multicultural Societylg...
|6
|1678
|499
Law Assignment | Essay on Wrongful Convictionlg...
|7
|1777
|54