logo

Understanding Director Duties: ASIC v Healey Case and Breach of Responsibilities

Research and write a report on an Australian case involving breach of company director's/officer's duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

12 Pages1811 Words259 Views
   

Added on  2023-05-23

About This Document

In this document we will discuss about Understanding Director Duties and below are the summary points of this document:-

  • Directors and officers in Australian companies have responsibilities under Part 2D.1 of the Corporations Act.

  • The ASIC v Healey case involved allegations of directors breaching their duties in relation to financial reporting.

  • The case focused on the duty of directors to read and understand financial statements and ensure compliance with accounting standards.

Understanding Director Duties: ASIC v Healey Case and Breach of Responsibilities

Research and write a report on an Australian case involving breach of company director's/officer's duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

   Added on 2023-05-23

ShareRelated Documents
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND
INVESTMENTS COMMISSION V
HEALEY [2011] FCA 717
(Student Details: )
Business and Corporation Law
Understanding Director Duties: ASIC v Healey Case and Breach of Responsibilities_1
Introduction
Directors and officers in the companies of
Australia have responsibilities under Part
2D.1 of the Corporations Act, 2001.
Purpose for imposing the duties on the
directors stems from the fact that the
business of the company is run on behalf of
the shareholders by them.
ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA 717- seven
directors of the company, along with its
Chief Financial Officer held to have
breached the duties imposed through the
governing act (Walmsley and Puri, 2011).
Understanding Director Duties: ASIC v Healey Case and Breach of Responsibilities_2
ASIC v Healey
ASIC v Healey, civil proceedings were launched
by ASIC back in Oct 2009 against the present
and ex non-executive director, the former CFO,
and the former CEO of different entities, in the
Federal Court of Australia, within the Centro
Retail Group and the Centro Properties Group,
collectively referred herewith as Centro
(Australian Institute of Company Directors,
2011).
Declaration was sought out by the ASIC
regarding the relevant officers and directors
breaching the duties which they had under this
act, towards the entities within Centro, for the
Understanding Director Duties: ASIC v Healey Case and Breach of Responsibilities_3
ASIC v Healey
The case which was brought by the ASIC revolved around
the central proposition regarding the director duties to read
and understand the financial statements in a proper
manner; following by the application of knowledge for
having or for the need of having attained for performing the
particular task.
ASIC claimed that the financial reports created of the
Centro group for the year which ended on June 30th, 2007
were not complying with the standards of accounting, and
also did not provide the requisite true and fair view of the
performance of the entities and of the financial position of
them, due to the failure in classification of a major value of
the interest bearing liabilities as being the current liabilities.
The crucial matters were not disclosed in the reports,
including the non-disclosure of the major amount of short-
term debt, along with the guarantees for the short-term
Understanding Director Duties: ASIC v Healey Case and Breach of Responsibilities_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
BUSL250 - Assignment on Business and Corporation Law
|11
|2833
|34

ASIC v Healey: Breach of Directors' Duties under Corporations Act 2001
|10
|1385
|343

Corporations Law Assignment Sample
|9
|2359
|106

Australian Securities and Investments Commission : Assignment
|4
|916
|119

ASIC v Healey: A Case Study on Breach of Duties by Directors under Corporations Act 2001
|10
|2744
|303

Corporations Law
|9
|319
|399