logo

Breach of Directors Duties under Corporation Act 2001 - ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023

Students will be assigned to groups of 3 to complete a group presentation on a topic related to management law, assessing their understanding and application of concepts covered in the unit.

12 Pages657 Words91 Views
   

Added on  2023-05-23

About This Document

The article discusses the breach of directors duties under Corporation Act 2001 in ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023. It covers the consequences of breach, facts of the case, cause of action, decision of the court, and reasoning of the court. The case highlights the role of AISC in situations where the conduct of the corporation has a severe detrimental effect on the clients.

Breach of Directors Duties under Corporation Act 2001 - ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023

Students will be assigned to groups of 3 to complete a group presentation on a topic related to management law, assessing their understanding and application of concepts covered in the unit.

   Added on 2023-05-23

ShareRelated Documents
BREACH OF
DIRECTORS
DUTIES
Australian Securities and
Investment Commission (ASIC)
v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA
1023
Breach of Directors Duties under Corporation Act 2001 - ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023_1
DIRECTORS DUTIES
(CORPORATION ACT 2001)
Section 180- Observe due care and
diligence
Section 181- To act in good faith and
best interest of the company
Section 182- to not misuse position
Section 183- To not misuse information
Section 184 – reckless breach of Section
181-183
Breach of Directors Duties under Corporation Act 2001 - ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023_2
CONSEQUENCES OF
BREACH
Section 181- Civil penalty (Section
1317E)
Section 182- Civil penalty (Section
1317E)
Section 183- Civil penalty (Section
1317E)
Section 184- Criminal offence
Breach of Directors Duties under Corporation Act 2001 - ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023_3
FACTS OF THE CASE
Mr Cassimatis (defendant) was the
director of Storm Financial Limited
(Storm)
Storm provided Financial services in
accordance to a model developed by
the director
The model involved the use of equity in
home to get a loan for investment
Severe losses were suffered by the
consumers through the use of the model
Breach of Directors Duties under Corporation Act 2001 - ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Corporate Law: Duties and Consequences for Breach by Directors
|7
|1815
|300

LAWS19032 | Company Law - Assignment
|13
|3307
|116

LAWS19032 Company Law: Project | Comapany Act
|15
|3866
|150

Company & Association Law, Assignment - LAWS19032
|18
|3707
|92

Business Law Assignment
|7
|1297
|58

Business Laws Assignment (Solution)
|15
|3314
|39