Fortescue Metals Group Limited's Case Study
VerifiedAdded on 2021/06/15
|16
|1088
|99
Presentation
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
B A C K G R O U N D A N A LY T I C A L R E P O R T
Fortescue Metals Group
Limited
Fortescue Metals Group
Limited
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
An Overview
The fourth largest iron ore producer and an Australian based
company, Forstecue Metals Group Limited founded in 2003, has
holdings of roundabout 87000km^2 in the Western region of
Australia often known as Pilbara.
The holding of the company is larger than its competitors BHP
Billiton and Rio Tinto.
The group has two main areas of operation which are the
Chichester Hub and Solomon Hub (Billett, Hribar and Liu, 2015).
The net revenue of the company as of now is US$8.547 billion.
The fourth largest iron ore producer and an Australian based
company, Forstecue Metals Group Limited founded in 2003, has
holdings of roundabout 87000km^2 in the Western region of
Australia often known as Pilbara.
The holding of the company is larger than its competitors BHP
Billiton and Rio Tinto.
The group has two main areas of operation which are the
Chichester Hub and Solomon Hub (Billett, Hribar and Liu, 2015).
The net revenue of the company as of now is US$8.547 billion.
Determination of Costs
Fortescue’s combination of costs involve
weightage of Equity at 36% and weightage of
debt component at 64%.
To find out the optimal capital structure of
the company the calculation of WACC is done
under which the costs are proportionately
weighted.
Fortescue Metals Group has reduced its total
debt levels from US$6.77B to US$4.47B,
which is a combination of both the short term
as well as long term.
Fortescue’s combination of costs involve
weightage of Equity at 36% and weightage of
debt component at 64%.
To find out the optimal capital structure of
the company the calculation of WACC is done
under which the costs are proportionately
weighted.
Fortescue Metals Group has reduced its total
debt levels from US$6.77B to US$4.47B,
which is a combination of both the short term
as well as long term.
Capital Structure
Debt to Equity
Ratio Debt Equity
8327 11301
110
8437 11301
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.75
The debt to equity ratio of the Fortescue Metals Group Limited is
0.42 as compared to the previous year 0.75 in the financial year
2017.
The firm has a lower debt as compared to the equity. This means
that the company is interested in financing the assets through the
equity component more.
Debt to Equity
Ratio Debt Equity
4646 11301
103
4749 11301
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.42
Debt to Equity
Ratio Debt Equity
8327 11301
110
8437 11301
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.75
The debt to equity ratio of the Fortescue Metals Group Limited is
0.42 as compared to the previous year 0.75 in the financial year
2017.
The firm has a lower debt as compared to the equity. This means
that the company is interested in financing the assets through the
equity component more.
Debt to Equity
Ratio Debt Equity
4646 11301
103
4749 11301
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.42
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Nature of Policies
Working capital management refers to a
strategy adopted by the management to
monitor the two major components of the
capital that is current assets and the current
liabilities (Daraban, 2017).
The analysis of the working capital is done to
evaluate the financial efficiency of the
company.
The primary objective is to make sure the
organisation is having sufficient cash to meet
its obligations and debt.
Working capital management refers to a
strategy adopted by the management to
monitor the two major components of the
capital that is current assets and the current
liabilities (Daraban, 2017).
The analysis of the working capital is done to
evaluate the financial efficiency of the
company.
The primary objective is to make sure the
organisation is having sufficient cash to meet
its obligations and debt.
Current Asset Investment Policies
Though majorly the performance of the
company is dependent on the assets and the
profit margin of the business the liquidity of
the company will be hampered if the assets
are not convertible into cash.
There are three policies in general
Relaxed
Moderate
Restricted
Though majorly the performance of the
company is dependent on the assets and the
profit margin of the business the liquidity of
the company will be hampered if the assets
are not convertible into cash.
There are three policies in general
Relaxed
Moderate
Restricted
Policy adopted by Fortescue Metals
The policy adopted by the Fortescue Metals group is
that of the relaxed nature for their working capital
current level of investment.
Under this strategy, Fortescue limited made a choice
to keep the current assets which are convertible into
the liquid assets and operational reasons.
This strategy can be achieved by keeping an ample
amount of cash, marketable securities and ahigh
proportion of inventories.
Implementing a liberal policy results in large
accounts receivable (Yarram and Dollery, 2015).
The policy adopted by the Fortescue Metals group is
that of the relaxed nature for their working capital
current level of investment.
Under this strategy, Fortescue limited made a choice
to keep the current assets which are convertible into
the liquid assets and operational reasons.
This strategy can be achieved by keeping an ample
amount of cash, marketable securities and ahigh
proportion of inventories.
Implementing a liberal policy results in large
accounts receivable (Yarram and Dollery, 2015).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Nature of the firm’s Earning
Dividend Imputation Tax system in Australia is established
where the some of the tax paid by the company may be
allocated or imputed to the shareholders .
This system is existing since 1987 and divided under the
broad categories of franking credits or imputed tax
credits (Magni, 2016).
The shareholders are given the tax credit to reduce the
income tax payable on the distribution.
The system of imputation effectively taxes the profits of
the company at the average rates of tax.
In 2012 FMG has distributed a fully paid franked dividend
$0.08 per share.
Dividend Imputation Tax system in Australia is established
where the some of the tax paid by the company may be
allocated or imputed to the shareholders .
This system is existing since 1987 and divided under the
broad categories of franking credits or imputed tax
credits (Magni, 2016).
The shareholders are given the tax credit to reduce the
income tax payable on the distribution.
The system of imputation effectively taxes the profits of
the company at the average rates of tax.
In 2012 FMG has distributed a fully paid franked dividend
$0.08 per share.
Earning Distribution Policy
Dividend Pay-out Ratio Total Dividend Net Income
681 2721
681 2721
Dividend Pay-Out Ratio 25.03
The amount of dividend paid to the shareholder is relative to the
amount of the income. The amount that is not paid put in the
dividends is held for the in terms of the growth of the company
(Gitman, Juchau and Flanagan, 2015).
The dividend pay out ratio of the Fortescue Metal Group Limited
in the year 2017 was 25.03 whereas as compared to the previous
year it was 50.9. This means that the company distributed less
dividend than the ideal ratio which stands between the 50 %
to75 %.
Dividend Pay-out Ratio Total Dividend Net Income
681 2721
681 2721
Dividend Pay-Out Ratio 25.03
The amount of dividend paid to the shareholder is relative to the
amount of the income. The amount that is not paid put in the
dividends is held for the in terms of the growth of the company
(Gitman, Juchau and Flanagan, 2015).
The dividend pay out ratio of the Fortescue Metal Group Limited
in the year 2017 was 25.03 whereas as compared to the previous
year it was 50.9. This means that the company distributed less
dividend than the ideal ratio which stands between the 50 %
to75 %.
Trends of Dividend Per Share
(Source: Fujitsu, 2018).
(Source: Fujitsu, 2018).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Long Term Debt To Capital
2014 2015 2016 2017
Long term Debt 9648 11664 8327 4646
Equity 8035 9797 11301 12637
Debt to Equity Ratio 1.20 1.19 0.74 0.37
Long Term Debt To Capital
2014 2015 2016 2017
Long term Debt 9648 11664 8327 4646
Equity 8035 9797 11301 12637
Debt to Equity Ratio 1.20 1.19 0.74 0.37
Total Debt To Capital
2014 2015 2016 2017
Total Debt 12585 15818 12538 9351
Equity 8035 9797 11301 12637
Debt to Equity Ratio 1.57 1.61 1.11 0.74
2014 2015 2016 2017
Long term Debt 9648 11664 8327 4646
Equity 8035 9797 11301 12637
Debt to Equity Ratio 1.20 1.19 0.74 0.37
Long Term Debt To Capital
2014 2015 2016 2017
Long term Debt 9648 11664 8327 4646
Equity 8035 9797 11301 12637
Debt to Equity Ratio 1.20 1.19 0.74 0.37
Total Debt To Capital
2014 2015 2016 2017
Total Debt 12585 15818 12538 9351
Equity 8035 9797 11301 12637
Debt to Equity Ratio 1.57 1.61 1.11 0.74
Profitability Ratios
Net Profit Ratio
2014 2015 2016 2017
Net Profit 2898 413 13325 2721
Turnover 12477 11164 9538 10982
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.23 0.04 1.40 0.25
Return on Equity
2014 2015 2016 2017
Net Income 2898 413 13325 2721
Average total Assets 23294.5 25951.5 26926 25445
Return on Equity 0.12 0.02 0.49 0.11
Price Earning Ratio
2014 2015 2016 2017
Price 2695 54 5730 2367
Earnings 2898 413 13325 2721
Price Earning Ratio 0.93 0.13 0.43 0.87
Net Profit Ratio
2014 2015 2016 2017
Net Profit 2898 413 13325 2721
Turnover 12477 11164 9538 10982
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.23 0.04 1.40 0.25
Return on Equity
2014 2015 2016 2017
Net Income 2898 413 13325 2721
Average total Assets 23294.5 25951.5 26926 25445
Return on Equity 0.12 0.02 0.49 0.11
Price Earning Ratio
2014 2015 2016 2017
Price 2695 54 5730 2367
Earnings 2898 413 13325 2721
Price Earning Ratio 0.93 0.13 0.43 0.87
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The final dividend amount announced by the
Forstecue Metals Group Limited in the financial year
2017 was A$0.25 per share (Fujitsu, 2018).
The final price decided for the allocation of the
shares which are to be issued to participate in the
Dividend Reinvestment Plan for the year 2017 was
fixed at $5.77.
The plan decided by the Fortescue has been
selective and the price allocated is on the basis of
the average market prices of all Fortescue shares
which have been traded for the past ten days on the
Australian stock Exchange.
The final dividend amount announced by the
Forstecue Metals Group Limited in the financial year
2017 was A$0.25 per share (Fujitsu, 2018).
The final price decided for the allocation of the
shares which are to be issued to participate in the
Dividend Reinvestment Plan for the year 2017 was
fixed at $5.77.
The plan decided by the Fortescue has been
selective and the price allocated is on the basis of
the average market prices of all Fortescue shares
which have been traded for the past ten days on the
Australian stock Exchange.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Dividend Pay out Ratio
2014 2015 2016 2017
Total Dividend 29 19 7 46
Net Income 2898 413 13325 2721
Price Earning
Ratio 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.02
2014 2015 2016 2017
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Dividend Pay Out Ratio
Dividend Pay Out Ratio
(Source : By Author)
2014 2015 2016 2017
Total Dividend 29 19 7 46
Net Income 2898 413 13325 2721
Price Earning
Ratio 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.02
2014 2015 2016 2017
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Dividend Pay Out Ratio
Dividend Pay Out Ratio
(Source : By Author)
Market Share Price
Financial management policies can affect the
performance of the company, share price,
market share, stock price after the
declaration of the dividend by the company
(Graham, Leary and Roberts, 2015).
The current year’s dividend is 0.11 and the
current year’s price of the FMG $4.54. The
dividend policy of the company let the share
price dip by 4% at the open.
Financial management policies can affect the
performance of the company, share price,
market share, stock price after the
declaration of the dividend by the company
(Graham, Leary and Roberts, 2015).
The current year’s dividend is 0.11 and the
current year’s price of the FMG $4.54. The
dividend policy of the company let the share
price dip by 4% at the open.
References
Fujitsu,(2018) [online] Available From http
://www.fujitsu.com/global/about/ir/stock/dividends/ [Accessed on 26th March
2018].
Billett, M.T., Hribar, P. and Liu, Y. (2015) Shareholder-manager alignment and
the cost of debt.
Daraban, M.C. (2017) Accounting as a 21st century business value driver. In
CBU International Conference Proceedings... (Vol. 5, p. 99). Central Bohemia
University.
Gitman, L.J., Juchau, R. and Flanagan, J. (2015) Principles of managerial
finance. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Magni, C.A. (2016) An average-based accounting approach to capital asset
investments: The case of project finance. European Accounting Review, 25(2),
pp.275-286.
Yarram, S.R. and Dollery, B. (2015) Corporate governance and financial
policies: Influence of board characteristics on the dividend policy of Australian
firms. Managerial Finance, 41(3), pp.267-285.
Graham, J.R., Leary, M.T. and Roberts, M.R. (2015) A century of capital
structure: The leveraging of corporate America. Journal of Financial
Economics, 118(3), pp.658-683.
Fujitsu,(2018) [online] Available From http
://www.fujitsu.com/global/about/ir/stock/dividends/ [Accessed on 26th March
2018].
Billett, M.T., Hribar, P. and Liu, Y. (2015) Shareholder-manager alignment and
the cost of debt.
Daraban, M.C. (2017) Accounting as a 21st century business value driver. In
CBU International Conference Proceedings... (Vol. 5, p. 99). Central Bohemia
University.
Gitman, L.J., Juchau, R. and Flanagan, J. (2015) Principles of managerial
finance. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Magni, C.A. (2016) An average-based accounting approach to capital asset
investments: The case of project finance. European Accounting Review, 25(2),
pp.275-286.
Yarram, S.R. and Dollery, B. (2015) Corporate governance and financial
policies: Influence of board characteristics on the dividend policy of Australian
firms. Managerial Finance, 41(3), pp.267-285.
Graham, J.R., Leary, M.T. and Roberts, M.R. (2015) A century of capital
structure: The leveraging of corporate America. Journal of Financial
Economics, 118(3), pp.658-683.
1 out of 16
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.