Environmental Impact of Beer Industry: Minimization and Mitigation Techniques

This presentation discusses the environmental impact of the beer industry, including potential harms, energy consumption, residual byproducts, global warming, and impact on health. It also covers applicable legislations and management techniques for minimizing and mitigating the industry's impact on the environment.


Food industry and
environmental management
Beer Industry


 The purpose of this task is to provide
information about the beer industry that how
this industry affects the environment.
 It also talks about the beer manufacturing
process and mitigations related to the case.
 The presentation provides justifiable proposal
for the environmental sustainability.
Introduction


 Malting: It is the initial step of the process of
making beer. Under this process the harvested
barley is sent to the factory for process where
it is heated, dried and cracked for the further
production.
 Mashing: it refers to the process under which
the grains are steeped into hot water which is
not at boiling temperature (Hps 2018).
Beer making process


 Boiling: Under this process, the mashed
product (wort) is again boiled for an hour while
spices are added to it.
 Fermentation: Under this process yeast is
added to the so received solution.
 Filtration Bottling and Packaging: Under this
process the beer is filtered and filled in the
bottled after washing the bottle. Lastly,
labeling and packaging are done (Campbell,
Beer, and Batten 2011).
Cont.


 Water and wastewater disposal: water is a
natural resource which is being scarce now
days. It is used in large quantities to produce
beer.
 Further the residual received from the
manufacturing of beer holds nutrients within it
which are being wasted (Olajire 2012).
Potential harms done by beer
industry


 Energy is required at every level of making
beer. So, it should be noted that electricity is
also being widely used to produce beer.
 Usually making of beer is a slow process but in
order to meet the demand it is made
artificially due to which all resources are
consumed at highest level (Donoghue,
Jackson, Koop, and Heuven 2012).
Energy consumption


 Spent grains, wastewater solids, turbs, surplus
yeast etc. are some of the by products
received in the process of making beer
(Schaltegger, Viere, and Zvezdov 2012).
 All these products can be useful in local
market but are discarded as a waste by the
companies. This creates water and land
pollution in the environment.
Residual of by-
products


 Under the process of making beer, CO2 and
many other gases are generated which further
are released in the environment.
 This causes global warming in the
environment as these gases depletes the
ozone layer which increases the risk of
sustainability of life on earth (Pasqualino,
Meneses, and Castells 2011).
Global warming


 With such environmental pollution, health of
people gets degraded. Also, it should be noted
that now days the companies are
manufacturing beer by using adulterated
products within them.
 This adversely hampers the health of people.
Also, increase in alcohol content of beer can
damage the liver of people (Fish, H., 2015).
Impact on the health
of people


 Beer is the product that is chargeable as soon
as it is produced. Even the unfinished beer is
also chargeable to tax.
 The companies, producing, holding,
manufacturing beer needs to get them
registered with the HM Revenue and Customs
(HMRC) (Legislation.gov.uk 2018).
Applicable
legislations


 There are many regulations related to the
production and packaging of beer. Also food
safety and hygiene regulations also apply in this
case.
 The companies present in this industry pays
different duty according to the content of alcohol
present in the drink (Legislation.gov.uk 2018).
 Beer should not be mixed with any other
substance, not even with water after the process
of duty suspension.
Cont.


 Reduction in resource consumption: : If
during the process of malting the barley, dry
milling barley is used then raw material will
provide better final results
 Waste management: The by products so
received in the product should not be
discarded. It should be used a fertilizer in agro
land (Aliyu, and Bala 2011).
Minimization and
Mitigation


 Pigging refers to technology that uses
specialist projectiles to recover, rather than
waste, residual liquid in pipelines or industrial
tubing.
 So, in this process, firstly the beer is being
pigged and then received for consumption to
people.
 This process remove or recover residual liquid
that remains in a pipeline (Olajire 2012).
Pigging


 Everyday water used should be measured
according to the production done by the
factory.
 Policies should be formed to look after the
process and monitor the use of natural
resources in the production process (Sánchez,
Ruiz, López, and Pérez 2011).
 Environmental friendly detergents should be
used so as to minimize its ill-effect on the
health of people.
Management
Techniques


 Pollution prevention should be adopted to
reduce the use of energy requirements for
waste handling and treatment.
 The by products like trubs of this products
should be used to feed the grain and increase
the fertility of the soil (Fejzić, Buljubašić, and
Eljšan 2016).
 No resource should be wasted by the
company.
Resource Recovery


 Thus, in the limelight of above mentioned
events, it should be noted that beer
manufacturing industry can be regarded as an
industry that is moving forward with an
excellent speed.
 The government should properly take care of
the legislations imposed on the industry so as
to protect environmental damage.
Conclusion

 Aliyu, S. and Bala, M., 2011. Brewer’s spent grain: A review of its potentials and
applications. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(3), pp.324-331.
 Brányik, T., Silva, D.P., Baszczyňski, M., Lehnert, R. and e Silva, J.B.A., 2012. A review of
methods of low alcohol and alcohol-free beer production. Journal of Food Engineering, 108(4),
pp.493-506.
 Brettell, R., Montgomery, J. and Evans, J., 2012. Brewing and stewing: the effect of culturally
mediated behaviour on the oxygen isotope composition of ingested fluids and the
implications for human provenance studies. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 27(5),
pp.778-785.
 Campbell, P.K., Beer, T. and Batten, D., 2011. Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production
from microalgae in ponds. Bioresource technology, 102(1), pp.50-56.
 Christ, K.L. and Burritt, R.L., 2013. Environmental management accounting: the significance
of contingent variables for adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, pp.163-173.
 Cimini, A. and Moresi, M., 2017. Effect of Brewery Size on the Main Process Parameters and
Cradle‐to‐Grave Carbon Footprint of Lager Beer. Journal of Industrial Ecology.
 Dabbene, F., Gay, P. and Tortia, C., 2014. Traceability issues in food supply chain
management: A review. Biosystems engineering, 120, pp.65-80.
 Donoghue, C., Jackson, G., Koop, J.H. and Heuven, A.J.M., 2012. The environmental
performance of the European brewing sector. European Union Google Scholar.
 Fejzić, J., Buljubašić, I., and Eljšan, S., 2016. Environmental aspects of energy and water
losses in the process of beer production and measures for their reduction. Available at <
http://www.tmt.unze.ba/zbornik/TMT2016/046.pdf> Accessed on 30 March, 2018.
 Fish, H., 2015. Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the
Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts. Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y
References

 Hps., 2018. Beer Industry: Environmental Concerns and Regulations [online]. Available at <
https://www.hps-pigging.com/beer-industry-environmental-concerns-and-regulations/>
Accessed on 30 March, 2018.
 Legislation.gov.uk., 2018. The Beer Regulations 1993 [online]. Available at <
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1993/1228/contents/made> Accessed on 30 March, 2018.
 Legislation.gov.uk., 2018. The Beer Regulations 1993 [online]. Available at <
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1993/1228/regulation/5/made> Accessed on 30 March,
2018.
 Legislation.gov.uk., 2018. The Beer Regulations 1993 [online]. Available at <
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1993/1228/regulation/6/made> Accessed on 30 March,
2018.
 Meyers, S., Schmitt, B., Chester-Jones, M. and Sturm, B., 2016. Energy efficiency, carbon
emissions, and measures towards their improvement in the food and beverage sector for six
European countries. Energy, 104, pp.266-283.
 Olajire, A.A., 2012. The brewing industry and environmental challenges. Journal of cleaner
production.
 Pasqualino, J., Meneses, M. and Castells, F., 2011. The carbon footprint and energy
consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal. Journal of food
Engineering, 103(4), pp.357-365.
 Sánchez, I.R., Ruiz, J.M., López, J.C. and Pérez, J.S., 2011. Effect of environmental regulation
on the profitability of sustainable water use in the agro-food industry. Desalination, 279(1-3),
pp.252-257.
 Schaltegger, S., Viere, T. and Zvezdov, D., 2012. Tapping environmental accounting potentials
of beer brewing: Information needs for successful cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 29, pp.1-10.
Cont.