Legal Aspects of International Trade and Enterprise - BHP Billiton
Verified
Added on 2023/01/05
|10
|2828
|62
AI Summary
This report evaluates the legal aspects that affect the operations of BHP Billiton, including the legislative regulatory framework and treaties, conventions, and agreements. It also discusses the company's global headquarters location, number of employees, and industry analysis.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
2019 Legal Aspects of International Trade and Enterprise BHP Billiton
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1 Executive Summary This report is formed in order to evaluate the legal aspects that affect the operations of BHPBilliton.Thisreportanalysedtheglobalheadquarterslocationandnumberof employees of BHP Billiton along with an evaluation of the industry in which it operates. This report also analysed a number of policies which are a part of the legislative regulatory frameworkofBHPBilliton.Alongwiththelegislativeprovisionsimplementedinthe country, the guidelines imposed by governments through different treaties, conventions and agreements are also analysed in this report.
2 Contents Introduction of BHP................................................................................................................3 BHP Billiton’s Legislative Regulatory Framework..................................................................3 Treaties, Conventions and Agreements................................................................................5 References.............................................................................................................................8
3 Introduction of BHP BHP Billiton or BHP is an Anglo-Australian multinational corporation that operates in the metals and mining industry. In 2001, Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd entered into a merger withBillitonPLCthatformedBHPBilliton(BHP2019a).Thelocationofitsglobal headquarters is situated at 171 Collins Street, Melbourne, Australia. The company has also established its operations in major markets such as Canada, the United Kingdom, Brazil, and the United States. In order to handle its operations on the global stage, the company has hired around 60,644 employees (Forbes, 2019). The corporation is one of the leading organisations in Australia and worldwide in terms of market capitalisation. In Australia, the corporation has hired around 16, 504 employees who are responsible for managing its operations (Statista, 2018). BHP Billiton’s Legislative Regulatory Framework The legislative regulatory framework of a company is referred to the legal structure which thecompanyhastocomplywithinordertoavoidviolatinganylawswhichare implemented by the government. As per these provisions, the companies are obligated to make sure that they effectively comply with the guidelines to avoid violating the interest of their stakeholders (Arblaster, 2014). In the case of BHP, there are various laws and guidelineswhichareimplementedbythegovernmentthatspecificallyapplytothe operations of the company. 1.Domestic Gas Policy 2006 (DomGas Policy) This is a relevant policy which is implemented by the government in order to promote the use of domestic gas in the operations of companies. Under this act, the prices of domestic gas have been reduced substantially by the government when compared with the prices of gas in free-market equilibrium (Haylen and Montoya, 2013). Since BHP is a leading oil and gas producers in the country, the operations of the company are directly affected by this policy. The company faces new burdens due to this policy which resulted in reducing its overall investment in the production and supply of gas. The company cannot sell its products above a certain price point which limits its operations and profitability. 2.Australian Jobs Act 2013 (AJA)
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4 The AJA is relevant legislation that provides key provisions which apply to the operations of BHP. As per this act, BHP is obligated to draft an ‘Australian Industry Participation Plan’ (AIPP). This is mandatory to be prepared by corporations that made a capital expenditure of more than AU$500 million which operates in developing and manufacturing industry (Competitionpolicyreview, 2014). Through this policy, the government wanted to make sure that reasonable and fair opportunities are available for other corporations that are operating in the industry by recognising their right to access the supply of goods and services. Due to this policy, a regulatory and administrative burden is imposed on BHP due to which the company has to increase its operating costs. It also increases the risk faced by BHP since its private information can be leaked to its competitors and suppliers. 3.Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) The Australian government has imposed effective policies to promote competition in the country while also ensuring that the rights of customers are protected. As per these guidelines, provisions are implemented for companies under schedule one of this act to makesurethattheydidnotengageinpracticesthateliminateoradverselyaffect competition in their respective industry while operating in Australia (Elliott et al., 2014). Along with these guidelines, provisions are implemented by the Australian government to make sure that the rights of customers in the country are protected under schedule. BHP has to make sure that it did not form a contractual relationship with its competitors, suppliers or other business partners in order to establish its monopoly in Australia by eliminating all the competition. For example, the company was sued by PotashCorp because it made a $40 billion offer for the hostile takeover of the company in order to expand its operations in the market (Economic Times, 2010). Along with these policies, the company has also obligated to protect the interest of its stakeholders. For example, it has to make sure that it did not make any claims to its customers regarding the quality or specifications of its products or services which can be constituted as false or misleading under section 18 of schedule two. 4.Taxation Laws There are various tax laws that are imposed by the Australian government on companies operating in the country. These laws also apply to the operations of BHP as well. For example,thecompanyisobligatedtopayPetroleumResourceRentTaxtothe government which is fixed at 30 per cent by the company. The corporation is also obligated to pay the Mineral Resource Rent Tax which is currently fixed at 22.5 per cent by
5 the government. Along with these policies, the company is also bound to pay the corporate tax on the profits which it generates in Australia. It is obligated to pay 30 per cent as the corporate tax on the profit which it generates in Australia (Hogan, 2012). Along with these taxes, the company is also obligated to pay the Goods and Services Tax (GST). This tax is imposed because BHP offers its services and products in the country. Currently, the government has fixed the rate of GST at 10 per cent which is imposed on the operations on BHP. 5.Employment Laws BHP is also bound to comply with the provisions imposed by the Australian government regarding the protection of employee rights in the country. The provisions in this regards are implemented by the government under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The company has to make sure that it takes corrective measures which are focused on protecting the rights of its employees by protecting them from hazards which they face in the workplace. There are various provisions given under this act in relation to ensuring that the company did not hire employees below the minimum pay wage or else it could be sued by the employee (Stojanova, 2014). Furthermore, the company cannot include any provisions in the employment contract that enforce the employees to work on public holidays or work for more than 38 hours. Treaties, Conventions and Agreements BHP is also affected by the provisions given under treaties, conventions and agreements thatareformedbetweenthegovernmentsofdifferentnationsinwhichBHPhas established its operations. The company has to make sure that provisions given under these treaties are effectively complied while conducting its business operations or else the company could face legal consequences (Selin, 2014). The guidelines given under these agreements directly affect the products and services of companies. BHP has to make sure that it assesses these factors since they affect its operations in both a positive and negative manner. The enterprise is subject to guidelines which are imposed by the governments through these policies to make sure that it effectively conducts its business operations. Agreement between BHP and the Australian Government for Iron Ore A relevant agreement that was formed between the Australian government and BHP was the agreement in which the work to undertake a strategic assessment on iron ore was
6 given to the company. This agreement came into effect on 18thSeptember 2012. Under this agreement, the government implemented policies to make sure that evaluation is conducted for the development of iron ore and understand its importance regarding the environment.Inthisagreement,theprovisionsoftheEnvironmentalProtectionand Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 are followed. As per the provisions of this act, the company has to make sure that policies are prepared for iron ore as given under section 146 (1) (BHP, 2009). The corporation has designed practices and policies to increase the efficiency of iron ore activities. Furthermore, various strategic policies are implemented by the company to make sure that it identifies the impact of on-going programs and their effectiveness. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) In this convention, countries joined together to made a pledge regarding addressing the issue of climate change. Australia is a part of this convention due to which the country has taken steps towards protection of the natural resources and reduction of the negative impacts of climate change. These policies are also enforced on the operations of BHP. As per these policies, the company has to make sure that it implements effective policies that are targeted towards the protection of environmental resources and reduction of its carbon footprint (Begum et al., 2014). For example, the company has adopted an environmental sustainability policy in order to manage its environmental impact by identifying, assessing andcontrollingitsoperations.Thecompanycontinuouslyfocusonreducingits greenhouse gas use and emissions which is crucial to address the issue of climate change. The company has further implemented policies that are focused on enhancing the biodiversity and improving natural resources which assist it in ensuring that it responsibly manage its resources to respond to the climate change (BHP, 2019b). These policies affect the product and services of the company as well because it has to change them to make sure that they are sustainable. AustraliaNewZealandCloserEconomicRelationsTradeAgreement (ANZCERTA) The treaties that are formed between countries in which BHP operates in assist the company in effectively operating its products and services to them. The countries also implementpolicieswhicharetargetedtowardsthepromotionofeconomicrelations between each other to improve the living standards of citizens (Shadikhodjaev, 2013). This treaty is no exception, and the provisions given under this treaty affects the products and
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7 services of BHP. Since the company offers them in the market of New Zealand and it also conducts its operations in both nations, the positive trading relationships that are formed between the two countries benefit the organisation. There is a wide range of legal policies and provisions which are removed by the government due to which they are not imposed on companies. Since these policies are removed, it became easier for the enterprise to make sure that it is able to effectively discharge its duties without engaging in legal complexities. There are various duties and provisions which are otherwise imposed on the operations of companies that are removed under this agreement that benefit the company is making it easier for it to offer its products and services. The offering of the enterprise is not priced at higher rates when they are available to the customers in New Zealand. Agreement with Banjima People In order to discharge its corporate responsibilities and promotion of diversity, BHP has formed an agreement with Banjima people that lives in Western Australia. This element is implemented because one of a key iron ore site of the company is established in Pilbara. This site is situated in the area of 8,263 square kilometres (BHP, 2015). Through this policy, the company has implemented policies that are focused on promoting transparency in its operations. The company has implemented this policy to promote the wellbeing and living standards of indigenous people in Australia. The products and services of the companyareaffectedbythesepoliciessincetheirpricesincreases.However,the company is able to charge higher prices from its customers because it complies with sustainability policies. Another benefit of this policy on the products of the company is that the production of iron ore has increased in the enterprise after the implementation of this agreement (BHP, 2015). This agreement enforces the management BHP to make sure that they address major health, social and economic issues which are faced by indigenous people in Western Australia. On the other hand, these policies also ensure that the company will be able to create a positive brand reputation in the Australian market which is crucial for the company to sustain its profitability.
8 References Arblaster, M. (2014) The design of light-handed regulation of airports: Lessons from experience in Australia and New Zealand.Journalof Air Transport Management,38, pp.27-35. Begum, R.A., Sarkar, M.S.K., Jaafar, A.H. and Pereira, J.J. (2014) Toward conceptual frameworks for linking disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,10, pp.362-373. BHP.(2009)NewsRelease.[Online]Availableathttps://www.bhp.com/media-and- insights/news-releases/2009/12/bhp-billiton-and-rio-tinto-sign-binding-agreements-on-iron- ore-production-joint-venture [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. BHP.(2015)Communitynews.[Online]Availableat https://www.bhp.com/community/community-news/2015/11/new-agreement-signed-with- banjima-people [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. BHP.(2019a)AboutUs.[Online]Availableathttps://www.bhp.com/our-approach/our- company/about-us [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. BHP.(2019b)Ourenvironmentapproach.[Online]Availableat https://www.bhp.com/environment/our-approach [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. Competitionpolicyreview.(2014)BHPBillitonsubmissiontotheCompetitionPolicy. [Online]Availableathttp://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/06/BHP_Billiton.pdf [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. Economic Times. (2010)PotashCorp sues BHP for $40-bn hostile takeover offer. [Online] Availableathttps://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/potashcorp-sues- bhp-for-40-bn-hostile-takeover-offer/articleshow/6608549.cms [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. Elliott, T., Trevena, H., Sacks, G., Dunford, E., Martin, J., Webster, J., Swinburn, B., Moodie, A.R. and Neal, B.C. (2014) A systematic interim assessment of the Australian Government's Food and Health Dialogue.Medical Journal of Australia,200(2), pp.92-95. Forbes. (2019)BHP Billiton. [Online] Available at https://www.forbes.com/companies/bhp- billiton/#33dca3514c2b [Accessed on 03/05/2019].
9 Haylen, A. and Montoya, D. (2013) Gas: resources, industry structure and domestic reservation policies.NSW Parliamentary Research Service, Briefing Paper, (12), p.2013. Hogan, L. (2012) Non‐renewable resource taxation: policy reform in Australia.Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics,56(2), pp.244-259. Selin, H. (2014) Global environmental law and treaty-making on hazardous substances: the Minamata Convention and mercury abatement.Global Environmental Politics,14(1), pp.1-19. Shadikhodjaev, S. (2013) Duty Drawback and Regional Trade Agreements: Foes or Friends?.Journal of International Economic Law,16(3), pp.587-611. Statista.(2018)BHPBilliton'snumberofemployeesbyregion2012-2018.[Online] Availableathttps://www.statista.com/statistics/274234/number-of-employees-at-bhp- billiton-by-region/ [Accessed on 03/05/2019]. Stojanova,N.(2014)TheregulationofworkplacebullyinginVictoria:islegislation required?.Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work,24(2), pp.146-160.