A Critical Review on Borderline Personality Disorder

This review discusses the causes, interventions and pharmacological treatments for borderline personality disorder (BPD). It covers the patient's perspective, childhood maltreatment, parental BPD, and feeling of abandonment leading to BPD. It also discusses mentalization-based treatment (MBT), schema-focused therapy (SFT), dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT), and transference-focused therapy (TFT) as effective treatments for BPD.

“A critical review on borderline personality disorder”
Student Name:
Student Number:
1

Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................3
Causes and interventions for the treatment of BPD.....................................................................................4
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................8
References.................................................................................................................................................10
2

Introduction
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a psychological well-being issue evaluated to influence
1-2% of the overall public. As a gathering, individuals with BPD persevere through a high level
of affliction, regularly prompting suicide endeavors, self-damage, and suicide. Relatively few
examinations investigate the main individual viewpoint of the individual experiencing any
psychological well-being issue. This may be particularly hazardous for individuals having BPD,
as this specific conclusion is trailed by shame possibly making help looking for harder and
helping connections increasingly defenseless. (Kverme, Natvik, Veseth & Moltu, 2019)
It has been proposed that people determined to have BPD experience issues with mentalization,
and that BPD is best comprehended as an injury and connection based confusion. Suicide
endeavors are regular among people who have BPD. In an ongoing substantial scale overview
the balanced hazard for having an ongoing suicide endeavor with the nearness of a BPD finding
was accounted for to be more than 13% (Olfson et al., 2017), among the most astounding
between all emotional wellness issue. Prior research has exhibited that somewhere in the range
of 3.0 and 9.5% end up ending their own life. The frightening seriousness of anguish and hazard
related with a BPD finding underscore the significance of creating sound learning about the
course of misery and recuperation for these individuals.
In the condition of BPD, it is very common with patients to have a feeling of impulsiveness,
having roblems in understanding their relations, having suicidal tendency and involvement in
self destructive acts. (Duque-Alarcón, Alcalá-Lozano, González-Olvera, Garza-Villarreal &
Pellicer, 2019). In addition, other cardinal manifestations of BPD, for example, outrage,
emotional precariousness, self-destructive conduct, and rashness, principally show inside
relational settings (Sharp, 2016). In a dimensional viewpoint, patients with BPD intermittently
show attributes of enthusiastic lability, uneasiness, division instability, brutality, lack of caution,
chance presentation, and antagonistic vibe, fundamentally influencing the negative affectivity
and enmity spaces. A portion of these BPD highlights have been considered as pointers of
identity weakness seriousness. (Liebke et al., 2017). Interpersonal issues have been proposed as
the most trademark and discriminative component of the turmoil (Euler et al., 2019 Proof has
3

appeared relational issues underlie abstract weight and conduct deviations (e.g., self-damage and
savagery), and that they are identified with neurobiological modifications. Therefore,
improvement of relational relations is a center point of compelling treatments for BPD (Cristea et
al., 2017).
There are very few studies which have been able to understand with the patient’s point of view.
That is its only the individual who is suffering from the disorder knows better about his
condition. But the studies are much more focused upon devising medication and further
intervention. (Lavik, Veseth, Frøysa, Binder & Moltu, 2018). This review will discuss those
patients who have an earlier history of childhood maltreatment, child abuse or any kind of
violent act that they have faced during their childhood. This will also take into consideration, the
condition of those parents who have BPD, there relationship with their children would be
discussed. The cases of abandonment and the feeling of loneliness leading to BPD would also be
discussed in the review. The studies that have been taken for this review are mostly based on
interactions done with the patients. The conclusions have been drawn on the basis of their
statements and experiences that they have gone through along with the various psychological as
well as pharmacological interventions for the treatment of BPD would be discussed.
Causes and interventions for the treatment of BPD
Stone (2019), reported a case study of five different patients who have undergone treatment for
BPD. All the patients had one thing in common and that was, they all had a history of some or
the other kind of mental illness in their families. They all had been diagnosed with the BPD at a
very tender age. The conclusion that can be drawn from all those cases is that, there are a specific
requirements of specific therapies and the way of treating every patient. It depends upon the
individuals own specific problems. For e.g., if the condition of BPD is result of child
mistreatment or a family history of domestic violence, and on the other hand a patient’s
condition is a result of sexual abuse then the type of treatment or the therapy given to both of
them would not be similar. Secondly People who come in the patient’s life at different points of
time also lay a major role in making their condition better or even worse. In the cases reported by
Stone one patient was found to be remarkably stable and confident when she found that perfect
one person whom she married and lived happily with him instead of having many abusive affairs
4

at first. Whereas a patient ended up being more vulnerable after entering into a wrong
relationship. He also reported that there were certain medications like antidepressants (chiefly
fluoxetine), mood-stabilizers (oxcarbazepine/Trileptal and lithium), and—during spells of
anxiety—clonazepam which were also proven to be helpful. (Stone, 2019)
In a study conducted by Kverme et al 2019, on patients suffering from BPD, they presented their
findings on the basis of individuals own experience on their treatment and recovery process.
They summed up their findings in a form of theme which they named as “Moving towards
connectedness”. It constituted four of its subparts which were as follows.
1. Learning to hold one’s own
It is very important for a person to have faith on their own that they are able to do what
they want, this feeling of knowing that they can do it brings miracle to life. According to
the patients interviewed in this study it was proved that the therapists played a crucial
role in inculcating this feeling of ‘you can do it’ among the patients and it brought about
a positive change in the way they used to view their lives earlier.
2. Needing honesty and genuine mutuality
It can do wonders to a patient’s condition if they get a right therapist, as a therapist is the
one who can make these patients aware about the fact that they are heard, their voices do
not go unheard. If patients are able to make communications and there is a mutual
understanding between the patient and the therapist then it could lead to the betterment
and wellbeing of the patient.
3. Daring to belong
The feeling of belonging that they belong to a particular group or community brings a
sense of homeliness in the patients. Group therapies are one such intervention which have
proved to be fruitful in moving one step forward for the individuals suffering from BPD.
Patients in their interview reported that they feel like home and they feel like they are not
at all judged by anyone, they are free to share their stories without having the fear of
getting judged or getting rejected, as they find people who are also like them, who are
also thriving to be heard. However some patients also reported in an opposite manner by
5

telling that they felt uncomfortable in such a gathering and they felt more embarrassed in
becoming the centre of attention while telling their stories.
4. Making room for recovery
This process was to create an understanding in the patients mind that there is a certain
time line which is created by the patient’s own mind, they evaluate their journey of
recovery according to that time line. Interestingly for some this timeline proves to be
enough whereas some find it to be insufficient and they start thinking about the process to
be inadequate and they start blaming the whole clinical setup (Kverme, Natvik, Veseth &
Moltu, 2019).
In a study done by Florange and Herpertz (2019) on parents suffering from BD, they reported
that among all cases of BD 75% of them are women. It was found that mothers who were
suffering with this condition were not able to give a rewarding parental care to their child. Their
behaviour towards their child was very bad, not only with child but with others too. They had a
feeling of insecurity all the time. Parental BPD could lead to child maltreatment which in turn
can give birth to another case of BD. The child would be prone to be diagnosed with the same
disorder in the future as his parents were. Three types of modules for the treatment of parents or
specifically others with BD have been discussed by the authors. All three of them were more or
less having the same efficacy and similar criteria only differing in number of sessions and the
duration. All the programs aimed at inculcating good child raising practices, improving parental
and child relationship, making mothers understand about the cues provided from their children.
Making them aware of their condition and the fact that this could lead to the transfer of the same
condition to their offspring’s too (Florange & Herpertz, 2019).
A study suggest that feeling of abandonment is also one of the biggest cause of BD among
individuals. Dread of deserting in BPD is here and there credited to early beneficial encounters
of parental enthusiastic disregard and contingent love. Others contend that it is a mental
phenotype which is heritable and familial while likewise being seen in non-shared environments.
A clarification that agrees with clinical experience recommends that surrender fears likely could
be a result of unfriendly early youth encounters with regards to a touchy inside attitude to be
dreadful of dismissal. BPD reacts well to mental treatments, for example, schema focused
6

therapy (SFT), dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT), mentalisation based treatment (MBT), and
transference focused treatment (TFT). Most incorporate an attention on relational components
with the end goal of improving relational working. In DBT, rationalistic reasoning affirms that
there is no unadulterated fact of the matter, recommending that the patient's impression of a
relational issue could vary based on what is really occurring. Relational viability is one of the
four modules in DBT and spotlights totally on connections. The reason of MBT is that issues in
relational working are supported by patients' absence of capacity to understand their and other
individuals' emotional sentiments and mental states (poor mentalisation). TFT centers for the
most part around the mix of disguised encounters related with useless connections from the get-
go throughout everyday life (Palihawadana, Broadbear & Rao, 2018).
Volkert et al (2019) suggested that mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is a manualized
treatment created by Anthony Bateman and Peter Fonagy, initially intended for patients with
BPD. The treatment goes for improving patients' mentalizing capacity, which can be depicted as
one's creative capacity to translate human conduct as far as mental states. In MBT, mentalizing is
in a roundabout way focused through empathic approval of the experience of patients inside the
remedial relationship just as through methods that legitimately intend to balance out or improve
mentalizing. Forward-thinking, it has been demonstrated that various PDs (BPD, ASPD) just as
different pivot I issue (e.g., psychosis, dietary issues, discouragement) show impedances in
mentalizing, conceivably adding to center issues of the disorders.
As indicated by the clinical idea of MBT, successful mentalizing can be portrayed as being truly
inquisitive about mental states, which may underlie conduct, adaptably deciphering oneself as
well as other people too staying alert that mentalizing might be incorrect. Solid mentalizing is
described by the capacity to effectively move between mentalizing posts, i.e., self and other,
perception and influence, understood and unequivocal, outside and interior mentalizing. For
instance, patients with BPD are frequently overpowered by their feelings (full of feeling post),
make too fast suppositions (certain shaft), and spotlight on outer signals shown by others saw as
demonstrating deserting and dismissal. Moreover, three types of deficient mentalizing can be
portrayed from a clinical perspective: teleological mode, mystic proportionality, and pseudo-
mentalizing. In the teleological mode, people keep an eye on just view conduct as proof for inner
states. In mystic equality, people sum up their interior experience onto the outside world. In
7

pseudomentalizing, people make mental hypotheses coming up short on an association among
interior and outside experience (Volkert, Hauschild & Taubner, 2019).
Pharmacological interventions for BPD
No drug treatment are at present authorized for the treatment of marginal identity issue (BPD). In
spite of this, individuals with this condition are much of the time endorsed psychotropic
prescriptions and frequently with extensive polypharmacy. However there have been some
comparative studies done in order to check the efficacies of certain drugs on BPD patients. A
study compared Antidepressant (trycyclic) and Antipsychotics over 64 individuals, but no
conclusion could be drawn. Neither amitriptyline which is an antidepressant nor haloperidol
which is an antipsychotic drug could offer any favourable position as far as mental state or
conduct. In another comparison when an antidepressant Monoamine oxidase inhibitor was
compared along with a placebo, this was also not able to reach any conclusive end. When two
antipsychotic drugs were comared in two different studies, among them one set contained
Loxapine and Chlorpromazine whereas the other set had Thiothixene and Haloperidol. First had
80 members while the later was done with just 52 individuals. The results could only set the
differences in their efficacies like chlorpromazine was more favourable over Loxapine and
haloperidol has advantages over Thiothixene, yet the information about their beneficial outcomes
was inadequate. A combination of mood stabilizers divalporex in this case along with placebo
was also done, the sample size was very less only 16 individuals were involved in this set of
study, it resulted in divalporex being more efficient than the placebo (Marco, Pérez, García-
Alandete & Moliner, 2015)
In addition there were some other pharmacological interventions, like the targeting of the
oxytocin system or hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning have revealed enhanced
attentional control of/reduced interference by negative stimuli in those with BPD. Finally,
antidepressants may also cause some alterations in the interactions between attention and
emotion in patients suffering from BPD.
Conclusion
8

Discoveries of ongoing MBT thinks about seem promising and propose that MBT is a
compelling intercession in various controlled and standard clinical practice settings. The
outcomes likewise recommend that it is related with improved results for patients, essentially
with BPD and furthermore comorbid scatters. Moreover, there is rising experimental help for the
viability of MBT in young people to forestall the advancement of BPD pathology in adulthood.
Also, first research demonstrates that MBT gives long term improved results, which are
frequently not examined in different psychotherapies. Also, there is a need to examine
mentalizing and other potential instruments of progress in MBT and to reveal insight into
conceivably shared or regular systems of progress crosswise over BPD explicit medications and
to unravel their treatment-explicit components. This could likewise prompt the likelihood to
make differential treatment signs. Besides, a headway of the comprehension of the essential
measurements hidden the improvement of identity psychopathology can educate treatment
advancement. Generally speaking, there is as yet an extraordinary requirement for future
examinations actualizing high methodological quality, utilize adequate example sizes, and
control for loyalty inclination. Future research should additionally explore both the viability and
adequacy of MBT, particularly past BPD, for other identity and mental issue.
In spite of all the proof that dread of relinquishment is a key side effect of BPD, further research
is expected to explain the centrality of this weakening and determined side effect inside the pain
and brokenness related with BPD. Improving our comprehension of this with regards to
anticipation, seriousness, co-dismalness, aetiological elements, age and sexual orientation will
illuminate treatment methodologies that unequivocally address dread of surrender inside the
treatment of BPD.
Another significant thought at the start of treatment with marginal patients is the evaluation of
their intellectual style. Those with a decent intelligent limit and of a reflective turn of brain are
able to function admirably with a psychoanalytically based methodology (expressive
psychotherapy, transference-centered psychotherapy, or other comparative strategy). In patients
where those limits are not conspicuous, a psychological conduct approach (persuasion social
treatment, blueprint treatment, and so forth.) may demonstrate increasingly compelling.
Treatment with marginal patients is commonly an extensive procedure. In that capacity, what
may have been an appropriate treatment approach at the beginning might be less reasonable at a
9

later stage, when a move to an alternate methodology may demonstrate increasingly successful.
Adaptability in treatment techniques will be a key component in the specialist's general
methodology.
Clinical preliminaries to typify the adequacy of the previously mentioned or comparative BPD-
explicit child rearing mediations and their preventive ability are earnestly required. Guardians
with BPD and their youngsters need approved, directed intercessions that block the
transgenerational transmission of this exceptionally debilitating confusion. These mediations
may demonstrate to be a profitable advantage for individual treatment and at last lead to the
decrease of the rate and predominance of BPD.
10

References
Cristea, I., Gentili, C., Cotet, C., Palomba, D., Barbui, C., & Cuijpers, P. (2017). Efficacy of
Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(4), 319. doi:
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.4287
Duque-Alarcón, X., Alcalá-Lozano, R., González-Olvera, J., Garza-Villarreal, E., & Pellicer, F.
(2019). Effects of Childhood Maltreatment on Social Cognition and Brain Functional
Connectivity in Borderline Personality Disorder Patients. Frontiers In Psychiatry, 10. doi:
10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00156
Euler, S., Nolte, T., Constantinou, M., Griem, J., Montague, P., & Fonagy, P. (2019).
Interpersonal Problems in Borderline Personality Disorder: Associations with Mentalizing,
Emotion Regulation, and Impulsiveness. Journal Of Personality Disorders, 1-17. doi:
10.1521/pedi_2019_33_427
Florange, J., & Herpertz, S. (2019). Parenting in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder,
Sequelae for the Offspring and Approaches to Treatment and Prevention. Current
Psychiatry Reports, 21(2). doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-0996-1
Kverme, B., Natvik, E., Veseth, M., & Moltu, C. (2019). Moving Toward Connectedness – A
Qualitative Study of Recovery Processes for People With Borderline Personality
Disorder. Frontiers In Psychology, 10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00430
Lavik, K., Veseth, M., Frøysa, H., Binder, P., & Moltu, C. (2018). What are “good outcomes”
for adolescents in public mental health settings?. International Journal Of Mental Health
Systems, 12(1). doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0183-5
Liebke, L., Bungert, M., Thome, J., Hauschild, S., Gescher, D., & Schmahl, C. et al. (2017).
Loneliness, social networks, and social functioning in borderline personality
disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, And Treatment, 8(4), 349-356. doi:
10.1037/per0000208
11

Olfson, M., Blanco, C., Wall, M., Liu, S., Saha, T., Pickering, R., & Grant, B. (2017). National
Trends in Suicide Attempts Among Adults in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(11),
1095. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2582
Palihawadana, V., Broadbear, J., & Rao, S. (2018). Reviewing the clinical significance of ‘fear
of abandonment’ in borderline personality disorder. Australasian Psychiatry, 27(1), 60-63.
doi: 10.1177/1039856218810154
Sharp, C., Venta, A., Vanwoerden, S., Schramm, A., Ha, C., & Newlin, E. et al. (2016). First
empirical evaluation of the link between attachment, social cognition and borderline features
in adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 64, 4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.07.008
Stone, M. (2019). Borderline Personality Disorder: Clinical Guidelines for
Treatment. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 47(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2019.47.1.5
Volkert, J., Hauschild, S., & Taubner, S. (2019). Mentalization-Based Treatment for Personality
Disorders: Efficacy, Effectiveness, and New Developments. Current Psychiatry
Reports, 21(4). doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1012-5
12