Impact of Brexit on UK: A Comprehensive Analysis

This report provides a detailed analysis of the impact of Brexit on various aspects of the UK, including political, social, economic, and educational. It covers the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, impact on education, social impacts, immigration and free movement, and trade.

Business Law

INTRODUCTION
The term BREXIT owes its coinage to Peter Wilding- Founder and Director of British influence
think tank. He supported the thought of United Kingdom proceeding to be associate of European
Union. Here it was staunchly emphasised that Britain should be part of EU at least for
completion of single market or else the way out will predate by sad word(Alabrese, et.al, 2019).
In 2016, vote membership of UK supporting the Brexit is momentous political event in 21st one
C for UK. After the referendum of June 23, 2016 numerous debates emerged on the coming
strategies and economic policies of Britain. Variety of events are categorised to be the cause
Brexit which will be dealt further. 51.8% of votes supporting the exit of UK consequently led to
official withdrawal from European Union on 30th Jan 2020, three years after Theresa May and
inducted Article 50.
MAIN BODY
On the day of the referendum, when poller s were asked, more than half of the leave poller
(nearly 49%) reasoned their polls on the will that UK should be governed by the decisions of its
own. This through s light over the suppression of its Parliamentary Sovereignty of Britain. Here
the precise meaning of the parliamentary sovereignty is required. It is now a principle of UK's
constitution. This makes law making body, the supreme jural authority in UK which can form or
nullify any law. The belief of parliamentary sovereignty is demonstrated in the War damage Act
1965 and was again emphasised in 2005 in case of R(Jackson) v. Attorney General [2005]
UKHL 56 [9] as “The bedrock of the British Constitution is … the Supremacy of the Crown in
Parliament”(Bisciari, 2019).
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Since 1961, when Britain joined European assemblage and later with the codification of the
European Communities Act 1972, the parliamentary sovereignty is subject to tremendous
debates. Further the lords in case of Costa v Enel(1964) and then in Factortame gave
observations declaring EU supreme which all the more accelerated the arguments in favour of
Parliamentary Sovereinity. The strong opinion of leave voters for ending the influence of EU
from administrative framework of United Kingdom became rapid motivating factor in Brexit.
Just before voting, Ipsos MORI analysis reflected that amongst highly ranked issues faced by the
country by Britons was European Union and its negative impact(Burrell and Hopkins, 2019).

The above precedents reflects the clear transfer of sovereignty from British law makers and
judiciary towards European Institutions and courts. There were views that regulations which
govern their lives, the duties they pay and the standards they obey must be decided by their own
representatives, who are accountable to them and whom they can change if are not satisfied with
the work. The voting if done for remaining the part of EU was considered to be step of
unfortunate wearing of parliamentary political orientation in United Kingdom. The elemental
choice was between self governance or continual under highly super-national program under the
auspices of big name of union(Fetzer, 2019).
The deterioration of sovereignty and contribution towards European budget due to immigration
cannot be overlooked but the staunch willingness to have the rules for UK made by its people
was major concern in voting. The thought of ultimate sovereignty was prevalent in British
sensibilities. It was enchanting in the minds and independent spirits of everyone in UK on the
edge of union. Beyond the influence of alien rule, the people wanted voters' power in history,
their democracy and their own governance. The conception of growth and development being
part and parcel of European community started turning into nightmare. All the supposedly
overwhelming and farcical use of EU legislation was abundantly used as propaganda against the
leave campaign. But till that time these laws have started being termed as absurd and ill-sourced
bashing the sovereignty since years.
Thus parliamentary sovereignty is significant but in-spite of being crucial moot point, it turned
out to be instrument of leave campaign with the acceptance of “ Lets take back control” phrase.
For Brexiteers, sovereignty is not a shareable or divisible characteristic but a thing that an entity
must hold wholly or not at all. With this view they voted for Brexit. The judicial enforcement of
parliamentary sovereignty is subject to ironical appeals as now this is a much convenient concept
and unnecessary energies are restrained from being directed to the dimension of this doctrine.
Thus legal narratives leading to exploitation of parliamentary powers must be stopped and the
unrepresented chambers of legislations must also be recognised(Koller, et.al, 2019).
UK after BREXIT
Many issues got resolved after BREXIT and thereafter a trade agreement was entered between
UK and EU to maintain the healthy trading between the entities.
Impact on Education

Brexit has wide impact on the education system in UK. The students who got native benefits
from the membership of EU were left with reduced choices after referendum. The tuition fee
they used to get on loose grounds with deductions as UK was member playing significant role in
EU. To curb with this situation, The scheme they’ve formalised are various and multiplex. UK
universities may displace direction to more loaded origin states. At the same time, few are
preparation to open satellite field in geographic region in Europe, to offer level works in trans-
national teaching settings. A few establishments are also working in potential legal drawbacks to
levy different fees. At the moment, every 3rd of global students attending United Kingdom
establishment are from the EU. People tend to move to Netherlands if the options are declining
for studies in UK. A humongous 49% of responsive persons said they’d select the Netherlands if
learning in the UK became too financially straining as they can't lend on their pockets for such
huge amount on education. Thus we can clearly understand that after the Brexit the students are
left with very few options and are seeking opportunities outside to work upon(O'Rourke, 2019).
Social impacts
Brexit exposed major risks to the policy developments in the country and also the government
now is to be more oriented towards the making of independent social policies for priority areas
majorly social care taking provisions, poverty elevation and delivering locational growth. Social
and employment risks are now narrowed as UK is not subject to charter any more. But human
rights legislation are now even more gapped as they are not constitutionally safeguarded. As the
UK aims to discover new ways to draw finances. The rights of the workers will also be
negotiated in order to secure new investments, if UK will not be able work on terms of
negotiations workers too face problems.
Impact on Immigration and Free Movement
Brexit has its accords on migration and free movement. After Brexit scenario respecting free
movement of British and EU nationals between UK and EU member countries has to be
calculated and the effects to be analysed. The very first device which may be assistive to foretell
the future of free motion of British and EU citizens is retraction agreement. The implication of
free movement can be seen as it has been specified in early part of back down agreement. The
withdrawal statement defend the UK and EU nationals and their family unit already working on
their right to inhabit in other EU states or will exercise ahead the end of transformation period;
they can pursue their abode even after Brexit.

Impact on trade
As the Brexit created cognitive state in almost all areas of commercial enterprise in UK it also
brought doubts on UK’s exports to EU. The dubiety creating concerns in the businesses and
firms and accordingly the funds have been delayed and these are very grave connotations for
UK’s economic system. The de facto orientation of UK is that it is lining towards a no deal
Brexit as the retraction agreement between UK and EU could not sanctioned by the British
Legislature. The no handling Brexit will be fatal for UK’s economic system as they could lose
duty free entrée to their closest and largest industry. The UK exporters could look WTO rules
and duty for trade with EU which will be high as compared to no Brexit scene(O' Toole, 2018).
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Brexit had affected UK deeply in every aspect. It has its political accord in
various attributes such as it had affected the internal politics of UK. World's major economy or
power suffered to get its way out of the downfall. The political parties started having row from
within. Growing uncertainness is another significant issue as uncertainty only has potentiality to
trouble not only the governmental system but in other attributes also. International relations of
UK are also tremendously affected by Brexit as being part of union it was considered as a major
player and strong power. While being in the union UK was relishing very close nexus with the
twenty-seven Continent countries. UK was also possessing its representatives in European
institutions such as Europeans Commission, Europeans Council and Europeans Parliament.
Effective decision making was also exercised by UK.

REFERENCES:
Books and Journals:
Alabrese, E., et.al, 2019. Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data
combined. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, pp.132-150.
Bisciari, P., 2019. A survey of the long-term impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU27
economies.
Burrell, K. and Hopkins, P., 2019. Introduction: Brexit, race and migration. Environment and
Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(1), pp.4-7.
Fetzer, T., 2019. Did austerity cause Brexit?. American Economic Review, 109(11), pp.3849-86.
Koller, V.,et.al , 2019. Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge.
O'Rourke, K., 2019. A short history of Brexit: From Brentry to backstop. Penguin UK.
O'Toole, F., 2018. Heroic failure: Brexit and the politics of pain. Head of Zeus Ltd.