Impact of Brexit on UK: A Comprehensive Analysis

Business Law

INTRODUCTION
The term BREXIT owes its coinage to Peter Wilding- Founder and Director of British influence
think tank. He supported the thought of United Kingdom proceeding to be associate of European
Union. Here it was staunchly emphasised that Britain should be part of EU at least for
completion of single market or else the way out will predate by sad word(Alabrese, et.al, 2019).
In 2016, vote membership of UK supporting the Brexit is momentous political event in 21st one
C for UK. After the referendum of June 23, 2016 numerous debates emerged on the coming
strategies and economic policies of Britain. Variety of events are categorised to be the cause
Brexit which will be dealt further. 51.8% of votes supporting the exit of UK consequently led to
official withdrawal from European Union on 30th Jan 2020, three years after Theresa May and
inducted Article 50.
MAIN BODY
On the day of the referendum, when poller s were asked, more than half of the leave poller
(nearly 49%) reasoned their polls on the will that UK should be governed by the decisions of its
own. This through s light over the suppression of its Parliamentary Sovereignty of Britain. Here
the precise meaning of the parliamentary sovereignty is required. It is now a principle of UK's
constitution. This makes law making body, the supreme jural authority in UK which can form or
nullify any law. The belief of parliamentary sovereignty is demonstrated in the War damage Act
1965 and was again emphasised in 2005 in case of R(Jackson) v. Attorney General [2005]
UKHL 56 [9] as “The bedrock of the British Constitution is ... the Supremacy of the Crown in
Parliament”(Bisciari, 2019).
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Since 1961, when Britain joined European assemblage and later with the codification of the
European Communities Act 1972, the parliamentary sovereignty is subject to tremendous
debates. Further the lords in case of Costa v Enel(1964) and then in Factortame gave
observations declaring EU supreme which all the more accelerated the arguments in favour of
Parliamentary Sovereinity. The strong opinion of leave voters for ending the influence of EU
from administrative framework of United Kingdom became rapid motivating factor in Brexit.
Just before voting, Ipsos MORI analysis reflected that amongst highly ranked issues faced by the
country by Britons was European Union and its negative impact(Burrell and Hopkins, 2019).

The above precedents reflects the clear transfer of sovereignty from British law makers and
judiciary towards European Institutions and courts. There were views that regulations which
govern their lives, the duties they pay and the standards they obey must be decided by their own
representatives, who are accountable to them and whom they can change if are not satisfied with
the work. The voting if done for remaining the part of EU was considered to be step of
unfortunate wearing of parliamentary political orientation in United Kingdom. The elemental
choice was between self governance or continual under highly super-national program under the
auspices of big name of union(Fetzer, 2019).
The deterioration of sovereignty and contribution towards European budget due to immigration
cannot be overlooked but the staunch willingness to have the rules for UK made by its people
was major concern in voting. The thought of ultimate sovereignty was prevalent in British
sensibilities. It was enchanting in the minds and independent spirits of everyone in UK on the
edge of union. Beyond the influence of alien rule, the people wanted voters' power in history,
their democracy and their own governance. The conception of growth and development being
part and parcel of European community started turning into nightmare. All the supposedly
overwhelming and farcical use of EU legislation was abundantly used as propaganda against the
leave campaign. But till that time these laws have started being termed as absurd and ill-sourced
bashing the sovereignty since years.
Thus parliamentary sovereignty is significant but in-spite of being crucial moot point, it turned
out to be instrument of leave campaign with the acceptance of “ Lets take back control” phrase.
For Brexiteers, sovereignty is not a shareable or divisible characteristic but a thing that an entity
must hold wholly or not at all. With this view they voted for Brexit. The judicial enforcement of
parliamentary sovereignty is subject to ironical appeals as now this is a much convenient concept
and unnecessary energies are restrained from being directed to the dimension of this doctrine.
Thus legal narratives leading to exploitation of parliamentary powers must be stopped and the
unrepresented chambers of legislations must also be recognised(Koller, et.al, 2019).
UK after BREXIT
Many issues got resolved after BREXIT and thereafter a trade agreement was entered between
UK and EU to maintain the healthy trading between the entities.
Impact on Education