This document provides an analysis of data related to crime rates and law enforcement in major cities. It explores the patterns of crime, victims' demographics, and the weapons used. The findings help in understanding the burden of crime and enable appropriate measures to be put in place.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Business analytics Student name: Course title: Instructor: 1|P a g e
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Business analytics Background Dealing with lawlessness in major cities of the world has really posed a major challenge to law enforcers. There has been rising statistics of every kind of crime from cheap threats to robbery with violence. The increase in this lawlessness has been attributed to rapidly growing population without employment. It has also been caused by high poverty levels among the low class living in the shanties of the urban areas. In this regard, various governments have instituted methods of curbing the crime rates in the major urban areas. The US government has been collecting all data related to crime from type of crime, number of crimes, location, sex, age and any other distinguishing characteristics that may help in profiling crime. The analysis of this type of data help the police department understand the burden of crime that they have thereby enabling them to put appropriate measures in place. It also helps understand the patterns of crime across a region which goes a long way in helping to manage lawlessness. However, due to advance level of crimes, there is need employ better technology to combat this vice. The subsequent section contains analysis and results from data obtained from the US security department. Data analysis and findings Victims’ descent by gender tabulation GENDER VICTIM DESCENTFHMXGrand Total A260252512 B137317623135 C358 F11415 H2484133725857 I5712 J415 2|P a g e
Business analytics K193554 O49010961586 P336 W109318042897 X72668101 Grand Total5752183676814188 Table 1 Table 1 above is a tabulation of how victims are distributed gender wise and according to their descent. From the results in the table, it can be observed that majority of crime victims were of H descent (5857). The other large group that fell victims of crime was of B origin (3135). They are followed closely by victims from H descent (2897). The least affected groups were victims of J, P and C descents. They were 5, 6 and 8 respectively. It can also be observed that in terms of gender, the males had majority of cases (8367) compared to females (5752). Tabulation of victims according to location and type of arrest AREA NAMEAdult Arrest Adult Other Invest Cont Juv Arrest Juv Other Grand Total 77th Street121215 Central91611187987251110057 Devonshire1313 Foothill516 Mission1212 N Hollywood145 Newton131317 Northeast2810 Olympic13812 Pacific321520 Rampart62374233516584789 Southeast77 Topanga1616 Van Nuys459 West Valley2911 Grand Total1547187711465902014999 Table 2 3|P a g e
Business analytics In a bid to understand the patterns of crimes, the study sought to cross tabulate location and the type of arrests that occurred in those areas. The results were as in table 2 above. It can be observed that the city of Central had the highest number of arrests (10,057). It was followed from far by the city of Rampart which had 4789 cases. The rest of the cities had the arrest numbers relatively equal and not more than 20 cases. In terms of distribution of arrests, the invest cont was the major type of arrest having 11465 victims. This is followed from far by adult other (1877) and adult arrest (1547). The least arrests were juvenile arrests (90) and juvenile other (20) Age descriptive statistics of the victims AGE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Mean41.5073671 6 Standard Error0.20371791 4 Median36 Mode114 Standard Deviation 24.9494153 3 Sample Variance622.473325 5 Kurtosis2.29427139 6 Skewness1.37923747 2 Range115 Minimum0 Maximum115 Sum622569 Count14999 Table 3 4|P a g e
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Business analytics The table above is of the descriptive statistics for the ages of victims of crime. It can be observed that the mean age for victims is 41.5 years. The median age is 36 years while the modal age of the victims was 114 years. The oldest victim was 115 years old. The box and whisker plot of victims’ ages Figure 1 Box and whisker plot is normally used to determine the distribution of a given variable. It is usually one of the methods to visually determine the distribution apart from the histogram. It is also able to show the outliers which affect the normality of data. For this reason, it was employed in this study to establish the distribution of the victims’ age. As can be observed the age was not perfectly normally distributed since the median line did not cut the box into two equal parts. 5|P a g e
Business analytics Table of distribution of weapons used by victims TOP 5 WEAPONS USED WEAPON DESCRIPTION NUMBE R PERCENTAG E STRONG-ARM (HANDS, FIST, FEET OR BODILY FORCE)393862.70% UNKNOWN WEAPON/OTHER WEAPON5088.08% VERBAL THREAT4096.50% HAND GUN1802.87% OTHER KNIFE1532.43% Table 4 Graph of distribution of weapons used by victims 3938 508409180153 Distribution of weapons used Figure 2 The table and graph above show the number of victims and the weapons used. It was found that the weapon that was used most was strong arm which had 3938 victims constituting to 62.7%. 6|P a g e
Business analytics The use of unknown weaponswas508 constitutingto 8.08%. Verbalthreatswere 409 constituting to 6.5%. The least number of weapons that were used are the hand guns and other knife. They were 180 and 153 respectively. this represented 2.87% and 2.43% respectively. 7|P a g e