logo

Business and Corporate Law

   

Added on  2022-11-14

12 Pages732 Words333 Views
Business and Corporate
Law
Name of Student
Name of University
Author Note

(1)
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
[1893]
advertisement containing terms for reward
is considered as binding offer for anyone to
accepting
In case advertisement of SOO burger
would be binding offer

(1)
Partridge v Crittenden (1968)
advertisements being published in newspapers
or hoardings considered as invitation to offer
instead of actual offer
treating advertisement for an invitation to treat
SOO is not bound by advertisement

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Business and Corporate Law: Contract Law and Corporations Act 2001
|12
|571
|395

Contract Law and Director's Duties under Corporations Act
|15
|1844
|323

Business and Corporate Law: Contract Law and Director's Duties
|11
|2372
|370

Business Law Assignment
|8
|2305
|275

Business and Corporate Law: Case Analysis and Application of Legal Rules
|9
|2128
|133

Business Law
|9
|2498
|258