This article discusses the concept of remoteness of damages in contract law and its significance in determining compensation. It explores two leading cases, Victoria Laundry Windsor v Newman Industries and Parsons (Livestock) Ltd v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd, which highlight the conflict and ambiguity surrounding this issue. The article also examines the common law rules and tests used to assess the remoteness of damages. Overall, it provides a comprehensive overview of this important aspect of contract law.