logo

Business Law Assignment

9 Pages2077 Words53 Views
   

Added on  2023-01-16

About This Document

This article discusses the issue of whether Dee has the right to take a refund of tickets from King Song Pty Ltd. under contract law. It also explores the validity of exclusion clauses and the provisions of Australian Consumer Law. The conclusion states that King Song Pty Ltd is liable for breach of contract and must refund the ticket amount to Dee.

Business Law Assignment

   Added on 2023-01-16

ShareRelated Documents
Running Head: BUSINESS AND CORPORATION LAW 0
Business Law Assignment
4/9/2019
Student’s Name
Business Law Assignment_1
Business Law Assignment 1
Contents
Question 1........................................................................................................................................2
Issue 2
Rules 2
Application 3
Conclusion 4
Question 2........................................................................................................................................5
References........................................................................................................................................7
Business Law Assignment_2
Business Law Assignment 2
Question 1
Issue
The issue of the case is to decide whether Dee has the right to take the refund of tickets from
King Song Pty Ltd. or not.
Rules
Under contract law, every contract is required to have certain elements are there such as offer,
acceptance, legality, consideration, the intention of the parties and capacity
(Australiancontractlaw.com, 2019). Here it is necessary to state that there is a difference between
offer and invitation to treat. An invitation to treat is simply an invitation of offers. In reply to an
invitation to treat, an offer comes. It was held in the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great
Britain v Boots Cash Chemists [1953] 1 QB 401 that goods displayed in shelves are an invitation
to treat and not the offer. When a customer takes the drugs out of shelves and takes the same to
the chemist, it considers as an offer and then after chemist by providing medicines and drugs
provides his/her consent (Dobson & Stokes, 2012). Apart from offer, acceptance is also must. It
can be made via various modes but when parties choose postal mode postal rules becomes
applicable. According to these rules, an acceptance seems to be complete as soon as party place
the acceptance enter to post.
Unfair terms are one of the areas of contract law, which is necessary to discuss here. One of the
most common types of the unfair term is exclusion clause. As the name implies, the exclusion
clause is a statement by making the same, parties of the contract limit their liability in respect to
one or more factors (Legalvision.com.au, 2019). People can use exclusion clauses oppressively
Business Law Assignment_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Business and Corporate Law: Validity of Exclusion Clause in Contracts
|7
|1359
|229

Business Law: Exclusion Clause and Unconscionable Conduct
|12
|894
|375

Business Law Legal Analysis Report
|10
|2583
|55

Legal Issues and Law Relating to Exclusion Clause in Parking Ticket Case
|7
|1782
|44

Enforceability of Exclusion Clause in Australian Commercial and Corporation Law
|8
|1804
|58

Business Law Assignment
|8
|1417
|41