This study material covers the duties of directors, defenses available to them, penalties for breach of duties, and remedies available to members under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). It discusses relevant sections of the act and case laws to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject. The material is suitable for students studying business and company law.

Research Assignment

Food Works Ltd, a groceries retailing business, has a board of three directors. Dion, Larry, and Peter. Dion discovered a lucrative business opportunity in the sales of organic food products in Australia but decided not to inform the board.

Learn about the duties of directors, defenses available to them, penalties for breach of duties, and remedies available to members under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) with Desklib's study material.

Business and Company Law - Desklib

Business and Company Law

Company Law

This case study discusses the directors' duties in Gold Dig Ltd. It covers the duty of care, skill, and diligence, duty of loyalty and good faith, and their application in the case. LEGL 201: Company Law.

Hartpury University and Hartpury College

Directors’ Duties: Gold Dig Ltd Case Study

This Business Law case study analysis discusses the breach of director's duty under the Corporations Act 2001 and the remedies available under the law. The case study covers the violation of duty by Dion, Larry, and Vance as directors of Food Works Ltd, and the defence available to them under the Business Judgement Rule. It also discusses the penalties for the breach of director's duty under Common Law and the Corporations Act 2001. Additionally, the case study analyzes the remedies available to Caitlin and Sarah under the Corporations Act 2001 for the breach of duty by Ben and David as directors of the company.

Business Law Case Study Analysis

This document discusses the duties of a director under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and analyzes a case scenario to determine whether Rubin as the chairman of the company has reached any fiduciary or statutory duties.

Business Law

This presentation analyzes Section 180 (1) of the Corporations Act, 2001 in the context of ASIC v. Rich [2003]. It explains the duty of care and diligence that directors of a corporation must observe and the business judgment defense that can be availed in case of breach of duties. The presentation also discusses the elements of the business judgment rule and how it was applied in the case. The conclusion highlights that Jodee Rich and other executive directors had not failed to observe their statutory and common law duties as prescribed for directors of a corporation.

ASIC v. Rich [2003]: An Analysis of Section 180 (1) of the Corporations Act, 2001

Business law  -  Solved  Assignment  PDF

This case analysis discusses the application of Section 180 of the Corporations Act, 2001 in ASIC v. Rich [2009] NSWSC 1229. The business judgment rule was applied to absolve the directors of One.Tel of charges relating to breach of duty of care.

Business and Company Law

Directors’ Duties: Gold Dig Ltd Case Studylg...

Business Law Case Study Analysislg...

Business Lawlg...

ASIC v. Rich [2003]: An Analysis of Section 180 (1) of the Corporations Act, 2001lg...

Business law - Solved Assignment PDFlg...

ASIC v. Rich [2009] NSWSC 1229- Case Analysislg...

Directors’ Duties: Gold Dig Ltd Case Study

Business Law Case Study Analysis

Business Law

ASIC v. Rich [2003]: An Analysis of Section 180 (1) of the Corporations Act, 2001

Business law - Solved Assignment PDF

ASIC v. Rich [2009] NSWSC 1229- Case Analysis