This report provides an understanding of the concept of business decision making and how it is adopted by managers. It includes a case study of XYZ plc, a hotel chain in the UK, and discusses the decision-making process for investment and the factors that affect decision making.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
BUSINESS DECISION MAKING 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents Contents...........................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3 Payback period Calculation.........................................................................................................3 Net Present Value calculation......................................................................................................3 About Financial factor.................................................................................................................3 About Non financial factors.........................................................................................................3 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................3 REFRENCES...................................................................................................................................3 2
INTRODUCTION Business decision making can be defined as process used by business organizations to select the best alternative as compare with others. This report has been prepared for understanding the concept of business decision making in systematic manner. XYZ plc is situated in United Kingdom and part of hotel chain in the country. The company outsource software andlaundrette services due to lack of resource. This report has been defined how business decision making process is adopted by manager to take decision regarding investment and also define factors that affect their decision in a brief manner. TASK 1 Payback period Calculation Payback period:It is a part of capital budgeting technique which used for identify time require by business organizations to recover the initial cost of their project. It is one of the most useful techniques of capital budgeting for small business organizations as the calculation of this method is very easy and it is easy to understand. However payback period does not consider time money 3
thus many larger corporation does not use this concept in their decision making process (GuntenspergenGross, J2014). Payback period for Project A (Software Project YearCash inflow in £Cumulative cash inflow 128,00028000 232,00060000 33500095000 455000150000 578000228000 rule of payback period= Base year +Initial investment- Cumulative cash inflow of base year / Upcoming year cash inflow 3+100000-95000/55000= 3.90 Payback period for project B (Laundrette Project) YearCash inflow in £Cumulative cash inflow 13100031000 23800069000 343000112000 464000176000 589000265000 PAYBACK PERIOD: 3+120000-112000/64000 = 3.125 Interpretation:From this calculation it has been recognized thatif XYZ plc decide to invest in software project then the company takes 3.90 years to recover the cost of initial investment and on the other it takes 3. 125 years to cover up the laundrette project cost. Both projects are able to cover up their initial cost within minimum time thus as mechanism of payback period the manager of XYZ plc will be take the decision to invest in theses project. Because higher time of pay back period interpret lower profitability rate for business organizations and lesser time of payback period show strong and beneficial cash inflow for business organizations. 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Net Present Value calculation Net present value: This value can be defined as the net value of future cash flow after deducting them from initial cost of project. It is use as most accurate and appropriate method of capital budgeting due to considering of time money in its calculations. Manager of business entities use this method when they take decision regarding accepting or rejection of a proposal. This technique of capital budgeting used to determine the rate of profits infuture (Akaaboune, Caskey and Akaaboune, 2018). For software project YearValue of cash inflowDiscountratefactor 11 % Presentvalueofnet cash flow 128,0000.90125228 232,0000.81225984 3350000.73125585 4550000.65936245 5780000.59346254 Total159296 Net present value: Present value of cash inflow of software project – Present value of initial investment cost of software: 159296-100000:59296 For Laundrette project YearValue of cash inflowDiscountratefactor 11 % Presentvalueofnet cash flow 1310000.90127931 2380000.81230856 3430000.73131433 4640000.65942176 5890000.59347971 Total180367 5
Net present value: Present value of cash inflow – present value of initial investment of Laundrette project: 180367-120000:60367 Interpretation: An organization accepts the proposal when the value of present cash flow is much higher than its cost on initial investment. In this case the net present value for the project A, software is 59296 and for laundrette project it is 60367. Both projects present value is higher than their initial investment this means that XYZ plc will be able o change their operation decisions and stop outsourcing of software services because they are in more benefit if they invest in software and launderette project. About Financial factor Financial factorsof business organizations considered those factors which effect the business decision making process directly. Manager of XYZ take decision after analysing the position and availability of theses factor within their organization. Following are the facial factors: Net profit:It can be defined as the sum up value of profits after deducting all the expenditure of business. Higher the value of net profit of organization higher the chances of success of business in future. Manager takes decision n the basis of determining profitably rate of projects in future. Income: The source of monetary resources by running business operations. Manager takes decision of investing if they are able to earn from the project higher future income. And they have source of capital to invest within the project. Cost of goods: This also affect the decision making , higher cost incurred on manufacturing of goods reduce the gross earning of organization . About Non financial factors It considered those elements which used to measure the performance of business entity and direct and inertly affect the decision making process. Non financial factors includes following Human resources: Business decision depends on the skill of human resources. XYZ could not invest in those project which required higher skills and technical knowledge workers. Success of the company depends on how effect workers fulfil their responsibility. Legal considerations: It is very essential for managers to choose those alternative n which they able to fulfil all the legal liabilities and which are in favour with their business. It is essential for manager to follow all the code of conducts (Farrall, and et.al. 2020). 6
Technology: The system, equipments and technology use by company to offer goods and check is as well effect performance of organization CONCLUSION From this report it can be concluded that for taking decision regarding future business policies managers use business decision-making procedure. In which they use mechanism of payback period and net present values, these methods help in determine future profitability rate and time taken to recovered the cost .Manager also considered financial and no financial factors to select best alternative for their business. REFRENCES Books and journals Malik, M. G. A., Ray, S. K., Bashir, Z. and Mughal, A., 2018, October. Selecting Ubiquitous Services in Future Heterogenous Wireless Networks using Multi-Attributes Decision Making. In2018 Eleventh International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Network (ICMU)(pp. 1-4). IEEE. Guntenspergen, G .R. and Gross, J., 2014. Threshold concepts: implications for the management ofnaturalresources.InApplicationofthresholdconceptsinnaturalresourcedecision making(pp. 1-7). Springer, New York, NY. Akaaboune, A., Caskey, K. and Akaaboune, O., 2018. Third-Party Logistics Provider Choice in Emerging Markets.Journal of Competitiveness Studies,26(3-4), pp.134-152. Farrall, J., Loiselle, M. E., Michaelsen, C., Prantl, J. and Whalan, J., 2020. Elected member influence in the United Nations Security Council.Leiden Journal of International Law,33(1), pp.101-115. 7