Producing Graphs and Charts for Pictorial Representation

This presentation focuses on producing graphs and charts for pictorial representation. It includes column and pie charts on student marks and satisfaction levels, as well as trend line graphs. The interpretation highlights the direct relationship between student marks and satisfaction levels.

BDM

Producing graphs and charts for pictorial representation
◦ Column chart on marks of students
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
45
50
60
70
75
85
Marks of students

Cont.
◦ Pie chart on marks of students
45
50
60
70
75
85
Marks of students
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Interpretation
◦It can be analyzed that marks of students and level of their satisfaction is carried out.
This is extracted with the help of pie and column chart.
◦It can be interpreted that students marks are in direct relation with their level of
satisfaction.
◦This is evident from the fact that marks of students in 2012 were 45 and in 2017 were
85, which means that performance is increased up to high extent and more marks have
been obtained.
◦On the other hand, level of satisfaction is also increased in relation to marks of
students.

Cont.
◦ Column chart on level of satisfaction
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3
4
5
6
7
8
Level of satisfaction

Cont.
◦ Pie chart on level of satisfaction
3
4
5
6
7
8
Level of satisfaction
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Interpretation
◦It can be interpreted that pie and column chart is prepared of level of satisfaction of
students.
◦This reveals that students of marks are directly connected to satisfaction.
◦This is evident that level of satisfaction was 3 in 2012 and it increased to 8 in 2017.
◦This signifies that student’s satisfaction level was maximized up to high extent.
◦It can be said that student’s marks are directly connected to their satisfaction.

Trend line graphs
◦ Trend line on marks of students
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
45 50
60
70 75
85
f(x) = 8.14285714285714 x + 35.6666666666667
Marks of students
Marks of students Linear (Marks of students)
Linear (Marks of students)

Cont.
◦ Trend line on level of satisfaction
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
f(x) = x + 2
Level of satisfaction
Level of satisfaction Linear (Level of satisfaction)

Cont.
◦Interpretation
◦It can be analyzed that trend line graphs are prepared.
◦This provides clarity to UK CBC that students marks in 2012 were 45 and level of
satisfaction was 3.
◦The performance is increased in as marks of students in 2017 were 85 and level of
satisfaction was 8.
◦This means that students marks were gradually increased in past several years.

REFERENCES
◦ Beach, L. R. and Lipshitz, R., 2017. Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard
for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. Decision Making in Aviation. p.85.
◦ Yuniningsih, Y., Widodo, S. and Wajdi, M.B.N., 2017. An analysis of Decision Making in the
Stock Investment. Economic: Journal of Economic and Islamic Law. 8(2). pp.122-128.
◦ Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. and Adeli, H., 2016. Hybrid multiple-criteria
decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering. Scientia Iranica.
Transaction A, Civil Engineering. 23(1). p.1.

THANK YOU