This essay discusses the techniques and factors involved in business decision making, specifically in evaluating investment proposals. It covers the use of NPV and payback period, as well as financial and non-financial factors to consider. Recommended for A&B plc.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Business Decision Making
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Evaluating the feasibility of investment proposals for A&B plc...........................................3 Different factor considers at the time of making financial decision......................................5 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................7
A business organization attains success only because of the decision taken by it at the right time. The business organization is required to take decision in regard to various aspects of the business in order to effectively attain its goals and objectives. This essay depicts the range of techniques that can be used by the organization in order to evaluate the investment decisions and the factors affecting it. Evaluating the feasibility of investment proposals for A&B plc In the given case, NPV and the PBP capital budgeting technique will be used in evaluating the investment proposals for the A&B plc which has been evaluated below. Net present value The NPV is utilized for determining the profitability associated with the project. It considered the future cash inflow converted in the present value (Lakew, 2017). This method assists in determining the efficiency and profitability in respect to each of the project. Project A Computation of NPV Year Cash inflows PV factor @ 14% Discounte d cash inflows 1300000.87726315.8 2350000.76926931 3400000.67526999 4600000.59235525 5900000.51946743 Total discounted cash inflow162514 Initial investment120000 NPV (Total discounted cash inflows - initial investment)42514 Project B Computation of NPV
Year Cash inflows PV factor @ 14% Discounte d cash inflows 1400000.87735087.7 2450000.76934626 3500000.67533749 4750000.59244406 5800000.51941549 Total discounted cash inflow189418 Initial investment150000 NPV (Total discounted cash inflows - initial investment)39418 The NPV of the both the project is positive which means that company can undertake any of eth two project. But the company can undertake just one and so it is better to invest in the project A because in it the amount of NPV is higher which is £42514 as compared to the project B having NPV of £39418. This method is considered more appropriate in relation to other approaches because it considers the time factor for determining the future cash flow. But it also has one disadvantage that is it is based on the discounting rate which is decided by the management and any mistake in selecting the rate will lead to the wrong figures, resulting into incorrect decision making. Payback period It is the technique which is being used in determining the point at which the investment return backs the amount invested initially (Kengatharan and Clamenthu, 2017). For the purpose of determining the same it divides the amount invested initially by the amount received yearly. Project A Computation of Payback period Year Total cash flow Cumulative cash flow 0-120000-120000 130000-90000 235000-55000 340000-15000
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
46000045000 590000135000 Payback period3.25 years Project B Computation of Payback period Year Total cash flow Cumulative cash flow 0-150000-150000 140000-110000 245000-65000 350000-15000 47500060000 580000140000 Payback period3.2 years The payback period derived under both the projects is approximately same at 3.2 years. This means that the company can invest into any of these projects it does not make any much difference. This approach is also used by the organizations for the purpose of taking the quick and instant decisions. Thus, based on the analysis, it is favourable for the company to invests in the project A as it is having higher NPV and lower payback period as well. Different factor considers at the time of making financial decision The decision-making process in an organization is influenced by the various types of factors which can be both financial and non-financial. It becomes very crucial for the managers to analyse the risk along with the cost associated with it. The key factors that the company should take into account are described below. Financial factors: Cost risk relationship:For investing in the project, the company requires adequate funds which is procured from the various sources and each source has it risk (Almansour, Almansour and Almansour, 2019). Therefore, the manager should take into account such cost risk relationship.
Availability of liquid assets:The company requires to ensure that it is having sufficient amount of liquid assets which can be used in the event of any contingencies. Along with that having consistent amount of cash flow will help in taking decision whether company will be having enough cash to run its daily operations. Profitability:The net profit trend of the company is also an important factor which cannot be ignored. The trend in profitability also provides an insight about the amount of additional funds that the company might be required to procure. Non-financial factors Market potential:It involves the market in which the company is willing to invest or expanding the existing market (Ahmed and Manab, 2016). The finance manager requires to first analyse the potential of the market in regard to the future growth because in carrying out the investment decision this information is very important. Managing the customer base:There are situation when the most of the income of the company is linked to the one or two high profile customers which makes it very important and difficult for the company in retaining them. In the situation, when the company is not able to retain its customers then it will result into adverse situation. Management:For achieving success in attaining the desired objectives it becomes essential for the company to evaluate the efficiency of its management team in respect to the managing the business (Pellegrino and Savona, 2017). It is also crucial to understand the skills and knowledge level of the existing employees in respect to handling eth new project in which the company is willing to invest in. Therefore, from the above it can be stated that the decision making is the major function of the organization which is required to be implemented effectively.Based on the situation given, it is better for the company to invest in the project A of dishwashing project because of eth higher profitability attached to it.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Ahmed, I. and Manab, N. A., 2016. Influence of enterprise risk management success factors on firm financial and non-financial performance: A proposed model.International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues.6(3). Almansour, B., Almansour, Y. and Almansour, A., 2019. Small and medium size enterprise: Access the financial and non-financial factors.Management Science Letters.9(5). pp.687-694. Kengatharan, L. and Clamenthu, D. P., 2017. Use of capital investment appraisal practices andeffectivenessofinvestmentdecisions:astudyonlistedmanufacturing companies in Sri Lanka.University of Jaffna. Lakew, D. M., 2017. Planning and forecasting in capital budgeting: The practice of business organizationsinEthiopia.InternationalJournalofScientificandResearch Publications.7(3). pp.241-252. Pellegrino, G. and Savona, M., 2017. No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation.Research Policy.46(2). pp.510-521.