This article discusses the unethical practices of exporting toxic chemical pesticides from developed countries to developing countries, and the ethical issues surrounding this practice. It also explores different ethical theories and provides recommendations to address this issue.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: Business Ethics and Values Case study: On the edge Exporting Poison
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2Business Ethics and Values PART 1 Introduction This article illustrates the rampant use of toxic chemical pesticides in the developing countries which are mostly exported from the various companies of America. Although the use of toxic chemicals such as chlordane, metribuzin, alachlor etc are strictly banned for usage in America almost twenty years ago and other developed countries. It is therefore evident that these companies are following unethical means in running their business. Ethical issues Many of these chemicals are used in Africa to build roads, in Australia and other eastern countries as rodent strays and is used as pesticides in some parts of Latin America. According to WHO these chemicals are extremely toxic and can have severe negative effects on using it. So it should be mandatory by the government to completely ban the use of these toxic chemicals even for the exportation purpose. About 60 per cent of these chemicals is used for the agricultural purpose in developing countrieswhich are usually labelled as poison during exporting. But the farmers distribute them in containers without any labels or warnings.The majority of the working children generally work in agricultural fields and as per the number goes almost 80 million in Africa, 152 million in Asia and about 17 million in Latin America are exposed to these toxic chemicals on a daily basis. Due to lack of education and basic knowledge, these farmers in the developing countries are actually using poison in their fields which can have a devastating effect if used for a long period of time.In the developing countries these poisoned labelled chemicals are distributed in small containers without the label and the farmers are getting exposed to these toxics unknowingly.As per the moral ethics, the government should take immediate actions against the exportation of such chemicals in the developing countries. Theories It has been seen that the US is the leading nation with respect to the exportation of pesticides in the Third World countries or the developing countries. On an average, it is seen that the US companies almost export 45 tons of pesticides each hour and among those pesticides, a majority of them contains harmful chemicals that have got serious environmental as well as health
3Business Ethics and Values hazards. In this case, the normative theories of ethics will help to discuss the ethical issues in this case. Some of the theories are mentioned as follows: Utilitarianism:The theory emphasizes the common sense and helps in determining what is right and wrong by cost-effective analysis. In other words, it is very important to understand the consequences whether it be good or bad before deciding to choose an action (Van Staveren, 2007). It is the responsibility of the managers of these pesticides manufacturing companies to understand the impact of their business on mainly the third world countries. Utilitarianism always encourages fair business practices and believes in the fact that it is wrong to harm others for the benefit of oneself (Playfordet al.2015). The companies need to do research and see the impacts of their pesticides on the environment and health before exporting them. This will not only help these companies to run business in a proper and ethical way but it will also help in taking care of the environment from the use of chemical pesticides as well as save the people from the harmful effects of these chemicals. Categorical Imperative:According toJacobs and Huldtgren(2018), it is our duty to behave in such a way that it is not just rational to ourselves but to all the people around us. So, in this case, it is obvious for the US companies manufacturing pesticides to only export those pesticides that are used in the country.It is ethically incorrect to export pesticides by putting a manipulating label which then severely impacts on the health of the people using it.It is very much essential for the government of the USA to regularize the exportation of the chemical pesticides into other countries especially the third world countries. In other words according toBrowning (2015),it is the duty to behave in a rational way so only those fertilizers or pesticides should be allowed to leave the country that actually can pass the standards of USA. Deontological ethics:It is basically a moral theory that defines the morality of an action based on whether the action itself is right or wrong under the series of rules rather than deciding the morality of the work based on the consequences of the action. In this case, it is noticed that several US companies are exporting almost 45 tons of chemical pesticides in the Third World countries which contains a number of hazardous chemicals such as chlordane, alachlor, metribuzin and some others. These chemicals are very toxic and have got adverse effects on the lives of the people using it and even on the environment. All
4Business Ethics and Values these chemical fertilizers are actually banned in the United States of America despite that they are exported in the developing countries.The farmers in the developing countries are using these pesticides unethically by distributing the poison tagged pesticides in small plastic containers without labels and they are buying poison unknowingly. Discussion As per my opinion, it is very much unethical and morally incorrect to export those chemical pesticides that are banned in the United States of America to other third world countries. Just because those countries do not have as much money or power as compared to the developed countries does not give them the right to export those chemicals that can affect the health and lives of the people living in those third world countries. As it is seen that the majority of these chemicals are used for the agricultural purposewhich are sold unethically without the proper label of poison in it leading to direct exposure to these toxic chemicalsfor the children working in those farms.These chemicals can contaminate the soil as well as the fresh water sauces with the harmful chemicals leading to various diseases such as neurological disorder, methemoglobinemia and cancers. PART 2 Recommendations In this case, it is seen that during 1997 – 2000 the US companies have exported over 65 million pounds of pesticides thatare severely restricted or banned in the USA. These pesticides contain extremely hazardous chemicals such as captafol, ISAF's and many others that might have a serious impact on the environment as well as to the health of the people using it. The managers of the organization who despite being aware of the negative impact of these pesticides continued exporting them mainly to the third world countries are the main culprits in this case. Besides the managers of the government officials in charge of exportation is also responsible for exporting these hazardous chemical pesticides in other countries. The organizations need to do research and see the effects of their pesticides on the earth and wellbeing before exporting those(Speklé
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5Business Ethics and Values et al.2017).These pesticides over long use can result in completely destroying of the soil due to acidificationandcanevencontaminategroundwater.Thiswon'tjustassistancethese organizations to run business in a legitimate and moral way yet it will likewise help in dealing with the earth from the utilization of compound pesticides just as spare the general population from the hurtful impacts of these synthetic chemicals. It is the obligation to carry on in a sound manner so just those manures or pesticides ought to be permitted to leave the nation that really can pass the measures of USA(Jacobs and Huldtgren, 2018). The government should completely ban the use of these toxic chemicals even for the exportation purpose. So in order to reduce this kind of unethical business practices the government, as well as the managers of the organization, can consider in following the below-mentioned points: Creating a code of conduct:The US government has to ensure the implementation of certain rules or regulations that will ensure the banning of hazardous chemicals in the pesticides(Touraniet al.2017).All the companies producing these pesticides and exporting them in various countries have to follow the mentioned code of conduct. Ethically correct leader:Employees to follow whatever their leader takes action. So, as a result, an ethically correct leader will ensure that the organization is following their ethics and morals while doing their work(Spekléet al.2017). Thus it will also ensure the reduction of using toxic chemicals for the pesticides that are exported. Reinforce consequence for unethical business practices:It is also the duty of the US government to make sure that all the companies producing these pesticides should stop the use of chemical pesticides(Browning, 2015).If any company is found not followingtheregulationsandusinghazardouschemicalshastofacesevere consequences which might even include shutting down of the whole organization. Empowering employees and buyers: The employees working in these companies must have a clear vision of what is ethically correct so that they can spot unethical practices and take the necessary steps to stop those(Spekléet al.2017).Users should be made aware of the presence of toxic chemicals by proper labelling in the bottles.
6Business Ethics and Values References Browning, N., 2015. The ethics of two-way symmetry and the dilemmas of dialogic Kantianism.Journal of Media Ethics,30(1), pp.3-18. Jacobs, N. and Huldtgren, A., 2018. Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments.Ethics and Information Technology, pp.1-4. Playford, R.C., Roberts, T. and Playford, E.D., 2015. Deontological and utilitarian ethics: a brief introduction in the context of disorders of consciousness.Disability and rehabilitation,37(21), pp.2006-2011. Speklé, R.F., van Elten, H.J. and Widener, S.K., 2017. Creativity and control: A paradox— Evidence from the levers of control framework.Behavioral Research in Accounting,29(2), pp.73-96. Tourani, P., Adams, B. and Serebrenik, A., 2017, February. Code of conduct in open source projects. In2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)(pp. 24-33). IEEE. Van Staveren, I., 2007. Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: Ethics in economics.Review of Political Economy,19(1), pp.21-35.