P a g e|2 Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................3 Key Ethical issue..........................................................................................................3 Moral philosophies........................................................................................................3 Stakeholders theory..................................................................................................4 Social responsibility...................................................................................................4 Deontological theory..................................................................................................5 Conclusion....................................................................................................................5 References...................................................................................................................6 Appendices...................................................................................................................7
P a g e|3 Introduction Woolworths is one of the renowned companies operating in Australia which have recently acquired the ownership of ALH group dealing in poker machine operations, gambling, and liquor trading. On July 2019 the firm decided to merge ALH group with its primarily owned supermarket business and sell products via trade sale or IPO. However, the staff in Woolworths alleged that the firm preyed most of their visitors to gather and share data regularly. All the shared data are been used to convert them into company profits(O'Malley, 2019). All the collected data are stored on Google drive and used for making gamblers play for a longer period. At present, ALH Group owns around 550 liquor store, 330 venues across Australia and holds 12,500 poker machines which show how the firm is transforming Australian cities into a gambling hub(Asia Gaming Brief, 2019). With this regard, this essay will evaluate the unethical consequences levied by Woolworths group fromsocial responsibility and business ethics point of view. Key Ethical issue According to Smyth (2019), Australia holds the world's highest record in gambling loses and when measured in per capita basis, on average an adult loses around $ 958 every year. The proliferation of gambling via poker machines in social clubs and pubs like ALH groups can be the cause of high loses in Australia. Under the dimension of games theory, gambling can be considered as a zero-sum example, a game in which one player wins over another one loses, thereby making a zero net profit altogether. According to Chóliz (2018), “gambling companies are businesses that benefit financially from gamblers’ losses” (p.2). Indeed, the case example of Woolworths reveals the unethical move undertaken by the company by looking upon other people data and documenting what they do, thereby giving rise to unethical business practice. As per Commonwealth' Gambling Measures Act 2012, voluntarily committed players can play in gaming machines that are set to a limited amount a player is prepared to lose while playing a game for preventing off-limit loses(Australian Government, 2012).However, Woolworths failed to adopt any such preventive measure and profiteered on customer’s loses. Moral philosophies Ethical dilemma in business practices comprises of situations derived out of wrongness or conflicts in actions or due to badness and negative consequences arising out of the situation. In other words, situations or actions performed that are believed to be morally incorrect results in adverse outcomes or considered as bad doing, resulting in firm's face a negative consequence(Tota & Shehu, 2012). A research made byPope (2015) shows that most of the contemporary workplaces overlooks opportunities and need that can strengthen ethics in their business practices. Ethical spins downplay or denies true costs behind unethical acts and fail
P a g e|4 to understand how betraying customers from wrongdoings can lead to negative consequences. Unethical practices in GM is one great example that shows how betraying customers can lead to a catastrophic results The firm made many of its customers die and face severe injuries due to ethical negligence made by the technical department in the car manufacturing(Darmstadter, 2016). Stakeholders theory Stakeholders theory incorporate ethics, promotes an effective, practical and moral way to manage organizational activities within a highly volatile and complex marketplace. According to Harrison, Freeman, & Abreu, (2015), stakeholders’ theory is considered as a practical approach because whether companies perform well or unwell, they have to manage stakeholders by treating them and reciprocating positively. This theory proves effective since it harnesses positive energy within stakeholders while achieving organizational goals by informing them about basic information, major decisions and how they attract market participants. Provided management decisions contain ethical components, ethical arguments can prove in favour of the firm and managing stakeholders becomes comparatively simpler. Arguably, few scholars and ethicists defend stakeholders approach using a variety of other ethical philosophies that contains integrated social contacts ideologies, Kantianism and fair-trade contracts. Others believe that "Stakeholder theory advocates for treating all stakeholders with fairness, honesty, and even generosity” (Harrison, Freeman, & Abreu, 2015, p. 859). After applying stakeholders' approach in Woolworths case, it can be said that the firm treated its stakeholders unethically by exploiting their valuable money, information, faith, fairness, and even generosity. Since stakeholder’s approach requires management to allocate resources and business code in an away that can satisfy stakeholders demands and needs, it is legitimate that Woolworths undertakes necessary steps to retain back stakeholders’ faith through intended participation in other productive activities such as anti-gambling and closure of unethical business practices that can hurt stakeholders’ sentiments. Subsequently, other business disciplines can focus upon stakeholders' groups in an effective manner, for example, marketing strategy on customers’ demands, human resources on employee welfare, financial management on shareholders return, etc. In other words, Woolworths require treating its customers in an influential way by respecting their behaviour and attitude alongside following the community standards it operates in( Sahut, Peris, Teulon, & Boubaker, 2019). Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility (CSR) plays a very critical role in monitoring and controlling business firms in global economies. Most of the developing nations have realized remarkable success by adopting economic reforms by undertaking market-oriented reforms. Moreover, the government keeps strengthening laws and policy frameworks to apply an effective legal framework during the times of ethical crises or business misconduct. In such, promoting CSR seems to be an essential factor that prohibits ethical degradation within business practices and issues related to legal systems or corporate governance (Jiang, Xue, Lo, & Wu, 2019). Social responsibility in businesses not only considers economic and legal expectations but
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
P a g e|5 also considers ethical obligations that society seeks from organizations while conducting business practices in general. Thereby, the adoption of CSR approach must not be taken as a simple consequence rather any decision taken by the firms must consider it marginally in decision-making processes. Similarly, standard governance practices can be taken as a base for optimizing socially responsible activities and achieving economic factors. In other words, good governance provides companies with a base to align stakeholders interest with corporate leaders and managers at relatively low-cost investment. By applying social responsibility approach, Woolworth's current business strategies regarding gambling and mining of consumer data can be eliminated as the firm will have to adopt principles that is accepted by wider culture and every stakeholders' interests, including customers and investors. Decisions taken after adopting CSR principles will not only make Woolworths reach the top, but stakeholders will get ensured that managers of the firm value their interest according to which every decision are being carried. Based on the decision made according to CSR principles, good governance can be applied in Woolworths company that will ensure future decision regarding new acquisitions and mergers and that they are made in favour of stakeholders and community interests rather exploiting Australia’s resources and culture ( Sahut, Peris, Teulon, & Boubaker, 2019). Deontological theory Deontological ethics are considered as "non-consequentialism" which states that some actions can be taken as promise-breaking or wrongdoing in itself and not simply wrong since they reveal bad consequences. Performing such actions can be proved exceptionally wrong or regarded as morally autonomous comprising moral limitations such as law and peace. Formulated by German Philosopher Kant, deontology in business ethics claims that when a person or any business action contradict their primary objective, the action will be considered as inconsistent. According to the philosopher, the action can be claimed intrinsically wrong and can contradict the actions performed if it just not justifies itself as ethically correct(Pope, 2015). Woolworth's ethical misconduct from deontological lenses states that the firm failed to clarify its ethical concern towards people and profiteered by holding valuable data. To eliminate such issues, the firm can apply a deontological approach in its ethics management by adopting a framework where issues are analysed appropriately. Respecting customers safety and human rights must be considered as a top priority and subsequently, fairness and honesty are grounded in its business operations. Though change is difficult, whenever a conflict of interest arises or moral principles becomes questionable, corporate structure and authority must represent open answers rather than being under construction. Subsequently, it is necessary that Woolworths follow a systematic framework in its businesses by following certain ethical guidelines that support predetermined principles or rules. Such actions can be further judged unethical or ethical after comparing it from the rules itself rather than through the consequences it may bring further to the company (Benlahcene, Zainuddin, Syakiran, & Akmal, 2018).
P a g e|6 Conclusion The above report analysed an ethical issue arising in one of the renowned companies in Australia, Woolworths and finds that the company got itself involved into various malpractices such as gambling business, liquor supply and data mining of consumers to make profits on it. The company owns ALH groups that operates in hotels, pubs and leisurely places that have made Woolworths fall under public criticism. The above report analysed some very essential components of business ethics, stakeholder's theory, corporate social responsibility, good governance and deontological theory to compare and contrast diverse approaches to Woolworths ethical decision making. After application of diverse theories and principles, this report suggests Woolworths undertaking stakeholder's theory approach as it will not only help the company regain its lost reputation but also ensure that all its future decisions are made after considering everystakeholders value. References
P a g e|7 Asia Gaming Brief, 2019.Woolworths to spin-off poker machine and liquor businesses.[Online] Available at:https://agbrief.com/headline/woolworths-to-spin-off-poker-machine-and- liquor-businesses/ [Accessed 17 09 2019]. Australian Government, 2012.Gambling Measures Act 2012.[Online] Available at:https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00159 [Accessed 17 09 2019]. Benlahcene, A., Zainuddin, R. B., Syakiran, N. & Akmal, I. B., 2018. A Narrative Review Of Ethics Theories: Teleological & Deontological Ethics.Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS),23(7), pp. 31-38. Chóliz, M., 2018. Ethical Gambling: A Necessary New Point of View of Gambling in Public Health Policies.Frontiers in Public Health |,6(12), pp. 1-5. Darmstadter, H., 2016. The Times and General Motors: What went wrong?.Cogent Arts & Humanities,Volume 3, pp. 1-15. Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E. & Abreu, M. C. S. d., 2015. Stakeholder Theory As an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: applying the theory to multiple contexts.Review of Business Management,17(55), pp. 858-869. Jiang, Y., Xue, X., Lo, C. K. Y. & Wu, H., 2019. Corporate Ethical Responsibility in Management Research: Intellectual Bases, Focus, Salience, and Future. Sustainability,Volume 11, pp. 1-17. O'Malley, N., 2019.Australia: Investigation confirms that staff at venues run by Woolworths' subsidiary, ALH, collected personal data on gamblers, dispensed free drinks to encourage longer gambling sessions.[Online] Available at:https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/woolworths-admits-pub- staff-collected-personal-data-on-pokies-players-20180806-p4zvpo.html [Accessed 17 09 2019]. Pope, K. S., 2015. Steps to Strengthen Ethics in Organizations: Research Findings, Ethics Placebos, and What Works.Journal of Trauma & Dissociation,16(2), pp. 139- 152. Sahut, J., Peris-Ortiz, M., Teulon, F. & Boubaker, S., 2019. Corporate social responsibility and governance.Journal of Management and Governance,pp. 1-12. Smyth, J., 2019.Woolworths to spin off drinks and gambling business.[Online] Available at:https://www.ft.com/content/83c07ad6-9d28-11e9-9c06-a4640c9feebb [Accessed 17 09 2019]. Tota, I. & Shehu, H., 2012. The Dilemma of Business Ethics.Procedia Economics and Finance,Volume 3, pp. 555-559. Appendices
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.