Earlier this semester (specifically January 23, 2020), we looked at cases involving the “duty to rescue.” (Recall Yani v. Bigan (1959) and Podias v. Mairs (2007)). In each case, the court analyzed the duty an observer owed to an individual in distress. Discuss the connection between the “duty to rescue” and the materials we have covered regarding business ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and how moral philosophy influences decision-making. I am attaching the class presentation connected with the question. Scoring Rubric Structure Content Support (x2) Spelling & Grammar 5 Points Well organized response with excellent transitions between points and arguments. Directly addresses the writing prompt and fully responds to each element of the prompt. Cites to multiple cases and articles for all factual statements. Contains 0-2 spelling or grammatical errors.
![[object Object]](/_next/image/?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Flogo.6d15ce61.png&w=640&q=75){kind=small}
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
