1BUSINESS LAW 1. The Bowling alley owed a duty of care to John to ensure that the customers be made aware that the floors are uneven which might harm the customers who have come to the bowling alley for the tournament. John was owed a duty of care by the bowling alley because it clearly read that the floor was uneven on the top of the stairs. The principles of duty of care states that every person owes a duty of care towards others and in cases where there is a breach of that duty of care, it gives rose to a case of negligence. 2. The standard of care is the steps a reasonable man would have taken to ensure the safety of a person to whom a duty of care is owed. It is the degree of prudence and reasonableness that is expected of a reasonable man so avoid any harm or injury to a person to whom the duty of care is owed (Luntz et al., 2017). In cases when the person has not applied standard of care in a particular situation where he is required to, he shall be made liable for negligence. By providing the caution about the uneven flooring, the bowling alley has applied standard of care. 3. John is a landscaper and after the incident John could not go to work as he had sprained his ankle, wrists and knees. John has lost his source of income as he is unable to go to work anymore. Therefore, pursuant to the injury at the bowling alley, John has suffered losses. 4. Standard of care can be judged from the perspective of a reasonable man and what a man of prudence would have done to ensure duty of care (Hendersen, 2017). The loss of income resulting from the injury is not due to the lack in duty of care by the bowling alley because the bowling alley had clearly put up a sign. John had a few cocktails and he had lost track of time. By being drunk, he rushed through the steps and also missed the sign. Therefore, it cannot be said that the injury to John was caused by the bowling alley.
2BUSINESS LAW 5. The bowling alley is famous for giving a feel of a night club with minimum lights and loud music. The bowling alley can claim that they had very clearly mentioned on the steps and people could clearly check the sign while going down the stairs that had made people aware that the floor was uneven and people were asked to watch their steps. 6. The types of Damages are: Actual damages: Supreme Court of Canada in the case ofRatych v. Bloomer, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 940held that there needs to be fair compensation Pecuniary damages: When the plaintiff is compensated in quantifiable monetary terms. Punitive damages:Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co,The Supreme Court of Canada held that the punitivedamageshastobeproportionaltotheconductofthedefendantintermsof blameworthiness. Liquidated damages:The damages that are agreedinto between the parties entering into the contract whereby the party breaching the contract shall pay to the non breaching party.
3BUSINESS LAW References Henderson Jr, J. A. (2017). Learned Hand's Paradox: An Essay on Custom in Negligence Law.Cal. L. Rev.,105, 165. Luntz, H., Hambly, D., Burns, K., Dietrich, J., Foster, N., Grant, G., & Harder, S. (2017).Torts: cases and commentary. LexisNexis Butterworths. Ratych v. Bloomer, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 940 Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co