This document discusses various cases related to business law, including issues, rules, and their application. It covers topics such as rewards, revocation of offers, partnership dissolution, property division, and more.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Business law1 BUSINESS LAW By (Student’s Name) Professor’s Name College Course Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Business law2 Business law Part one Issues The ten customers who do not have the advertisement can they get an offer? Rules The following rules are involved in the case; Reward cases are advertisements where conditions have to be fulfilled in order to reclaim the reward (Micklitz, Howells, Marques and Naude 2018). Revocation of an offer can take place any time so long as someone has already received the offer. However it should be done the same way it was advertised (Guan and Zhou 2017). Application The extra 10 people cannot receive the offer. If they had an advertisement copy they would have received the offer through claiming reward. The wall notice would have been neglected by arguing that notice on the local shop is not enough for the public compared to a local newspaper (Guan and Zhou 2017). Conclusion In conclusion, the friends can therefore receive the offer through social arrangements where there are no statements of legal relations.
Business law3 Partnership case Issues The case has the following key issue; Effect of death to the business partnership Rules When one of the partners gets deceased or permanent disability, In case there are no prior agreements, a negotiated agreement with the family partners of the deceased are applied (Jeffrey et al. 2015). The partnership act of 1963 in Australia recommends that the partnership is dissolved and the properties are shared in ratio of contribution (Jeffrey et al.2015). Application In the case that the LuSeKo group has a written argument they will use it. Since they seem not to have an agreement with the death of Seamus the partnership has to be dissolved with the shares of each contributed. Conclusion In conclusion, the death of Seamus will mean the end of partnership business of the three individual. This will be possible through Australian partnership Act of 1963. Part F
Business law4 Issues The second issue is how to determine partnership properties and how to divide losses when they happen according to partnership laws. Rules In dividing the partnership properties, two rules apply; the initial partnership contribution and the business partnership (Ke, Jefferies and Davis 2018). Initial partnership contribution of the partnership ACT recommends that losses and profits are shared equally according to the percentage of the earlier contribution towards the business (Murray 2016). The business partnership considers all the original capital that was contributed as equal. Each member’s contribution is considered as for the business and shared equally. Application For Lucy and Koo they can determine partnership property using the law. They should find out each person’s contribution to the business. Their contribution therefore becomes their partnership property. For the losses accrued they can pay using the partnership rule. The net loss liability should be divided amongst them as members; each of them will have to pay for the loss that accrued reducing the burden on Lucy alone.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Business law5 Conclusion In conclusion partnership act help partnership business by reducing individual losses and profits.
Business law6 References Micklitz, H.W., Howells, G., Marques, C.L. and Naude, T., 2018. Dissemination of Consumer Law and Policy in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Australia.Journal of Consumer Policy,41(4), pp.303-307. Ke, Y., Jefferies,M. andDavis,P.,2018. AComparisonof PublicPrivatePartnership Environment Between Australia and China. InProceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate(pp. 35-43). Springer, Singapore. Murray, P., 2016. EU–Australia relations: a strategic partnership in all but name?.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,29(1), pp.171-191. Guan, P. and Zhou, W., 2017, August. Business analytics generated data brokerage: law, ethical and social issues. InInternational Conference on Future Network Systems and Security(pp. 167- 175). Springer, Cham. Jeffrey F Fitzpatrick, Christopher F. Symes , Angelo Veljanovski and David Parker 2015. Business and corporation Law. 3rd edition, Routledge. (117-119)