Unconscionable Conduct in Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd and Amadio Case

Business law
5 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 9

Business Law 1
Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd and Amadio (Case no: 151 CLR 447; 1983)
The aim of paper is to provide the summary of argument among the Commercial Bank of
Australia Ltd and Amadio (Case no: 151 CLR 447; 1983) which shows unconscionable conduct
conduct in the act related to trade practices and how it leads to the substantiative share of
agreement that occur between both the parties that are involved in the case.
Facts of the High Court Case
Some of the facts of the case are given below –
 Mr. and Mrs. Amadio, an elderly Italian couple who were migrant and stood as
guarantors in contradiction of the loan taken by the son for his corporate from
Commercial bank of Australia.1
 Amadios who are the respondents were not informed about any of the facts related to the
mortgage without knowing the fact about the deal between the son and bank.
 Mr. and Mrs. Amadio were migrants from Italian side to Australia due to which they
spoke very less English as a language because they were uneducated.2
 In the case, when the appellant (which is Commercial Bank of Australia) tried to take
hold of the house then respondents (who are Amadio) tried to encounter authority of bank
loan.
1 Jason Fee, ‘Undue Influence: Inspirations from Australia?,’ Hong Kong Law Journal 48 (2018): 375-388.
2 High Court of Australia, Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12
May 1983) (2019) < http://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/14.html>.

Business Law 2
Key Legal Issue or Issues for Case
Issue of Unconscionable conduct
The unconscionable conduct is considered as the case class in which the party makes the
unconscientiously usage of his larger situation or the negotiating power to party that majorly go
through from the distinct incapacity or positioned in condition of the drawback.3 In this case,
Amadio’s suffer from superior drawback as Commercial bank has made it unconscionable for
them to remain dependent on guarantee.
Issue of misrepresentation
Another issue, which is witnessed in the case, Amadios did not seek for the independent as well
as the professional advice related to the contract because of their trust or emotional connect with
the son. Instead of the fact, the bank manager Mr. Virgo was aware about the exact concern to
the Vincenzo Amadio’s corporate situation but he did not recommend Amadiaos to search for the
independent assistance. This was supported with the situation of Amadios in the case as they had
very little understanding of language English. 4They were immigrants to Australia from Italian
state due to which they were not good at this language.
Each Judge’s Decision in Case
The case of Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio majorly includes two judges that are
Justice Mason and Justice Deane.
3 Ross Cranston, Principles of banking law. (Oxford University Press, 2018).
4 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12 May 1983)