Business Law

Verified

Added on  2023/04/04

|13
|432
|294
PowerPoint Presentation
AI Summary
Hi there I will send an email with the assignment support,that work better for me. Preferably to send back on email not post!Thanks
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
BUSINESS LAW
( TASK 3 )
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
Case 1
This deals with the chapter 1 -Prohibition
of the Competition Act 1998.
Infringement of the competition law civil
cartels.
Document Page
Mercedes-Benz
Mercedes-Benz was engaged in the distribution of
commercial vehicles.
A formal investigation was initiated as it resulted in
the breach of the competition act in the cartels
(Graham, 2016).
Document Page
Statutory Time Table
Phase 1 Date Action
1 January 2010 Case opened
28 June 2012 OFT issued statement
21 February 2013 Infringement announced
27 March 2013 Case closed
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Findings
It was found out that OFT launched a
formal investigation against Mercedes
Benz and its 5 dealers in the north region.
They were engaged in the infringement of
the competitin law.
Document Page
Final Decision
Competition and Markets Authority
announced that Mercedes Benz and the
five dealers agreed to pay the fine of £2.8
Million.
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
Case 2
This law has been enacted to stop the
anti- competitive practices which are
prevailing the the market (Rodger, 2015).
As we know competition is necessary for
the sustainable developement of the
market and helps consumers in increasing
their reach as well as their choice.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
JD Sports/ Go Outdoors
Merger Inquiry
JD Sports acquired the Go Outdoors
Topco Limited
Due to which both the parties will cease to
exist as separate entities.
Document Page
Continued..
As the case involved the creation of
merger situation under Enterprise Act
2002.
The case was refered to Competition and
Markets Authority (CMA).
Document Page
Statutory Time Table
Phase 1 Date Action
18 May 2017 Decision announced
20 March to 3 April 2017 Invitation to comment
20 March 2017 Launch of merger inquiry
22 December 2016 Initial enforcement order
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Findings
This may result in the reduction of the
choice in the UK market.
Both the entities will fail to retain their
position as separate entities.
Document Page
Final Decision
The CMA granted the approval for a tie up
between sports retailer JD Sports and
outdoor brand Go Outdoors.
This was agreed for a sum of £112m.
This may result in increase of the
consumer base for the merged
organization.
Document Page
REFERENCES
Whish, R. and Bailey, D., 2015. Competition law.
Oxford University Press, USA.
Graham, C., 2016. UK: The Concurrent Enforcement
by Regulators of Competition Law and Sector-
Specific Regulation. Journal of European
Competition Law & Practice, p.lpw016.
Rodger, B.J., 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015
and collective redress for competition law
infringements in the UK: a class act?. Journal of
Antitrust Enforcement. 3(2). pp.258-286.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 13
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]