This assignment covers various topics related to business law such as common law legal system, federal distribution of power, legal risks in business, contract law, and more. It also provides recommendations and solutions to resolve legal issues in a business. The subject is Mgmt 212 and the college/university is not mentioned.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Business law assignment (Mgmt 212)
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Question 1..................................................................................................................................3 Question 2..................................................................................................................................3 Part A.....................................................................................................................................3 Part B......................................................................................................................................4 Part C......................................................................................................................................4 Question 3..................................................................................................................................4 Question 4..................................................................................................................................4 Part A.....................................................................................................................................4 Part B......................................................................................................................................4 Part C......................................................................................................................................5 Part D.....................................................................................................................................5 Question 5..................................................................................................................................5 Question 6..................................................................................................................................5 Part A.....................................................................................................................................5 Part B......................................................................................................................................5 Question 7..................................................................................................................................5 Part A.....................................................................................................................................5 Part B......................................................................................................................................6 References..................................................................................................................................7
QUESTION 1 In a general law legal system, an authority, or aprecedent istermed as a principle or a rule that is developed in a historic legal case which is binding or influential for a court or related committees while making decisions on following cases having same issues or matter. Further, a common law legal system poses higher value on making a decision on the case in accordance with the stabilized principle rule, by this, the same facts will be able to generate same and expected results, and the precedent observance is the means by which the attainment of the goal is facilitatedLaw (Connection, 2018).Thestare decisis is referred to as the principles; wherein there is binding on judges towardstheprecedents. The common law precedentprinciple is the fundamental principle, or in a Latin way it can be considered asstare decisis, that means‘to stand by the decision’.Furthermore, the precedent doctrine is an aspect in which judges of Canada are obliged to follow the judgements made fromCanadian courts of higher jurisdiction in the same cases while reaching onto a judgment (Daly, 2015). It is stated by the doctrine that inthe English courts hierarchy, a judgement made by the superior court would be entirely binding over the inferior courts, which stated that if a judge attempts cases, then they must consider whether the same case has been previously attempted by a court or not. In a situation where precedent was set by a supreme or equal court, then the judge is required to follow that specific precedent, and if a precedent is set by an inferior court, then the judge is not bound to follow the same but is required to consider it. QUESTION 2 By considering the given case scenario, due to unethical behaviour of Cranbrook Company environment is adversely affected. In this case; the concern of local ecologist is viable as it is his human right to live in clean environments where surrounding parties behave in a reasonable manner. Part A Within Canada, the federal distribution of power as well responsibilities based on legislation is the fact, which is concerned byindividuals while considering significant country’s social, economic, political and cultural issues (Ryngaert, 2015). In the present case, concurrent jurisdiction refers to a breach of Canada Business Corporations Actand non-compliance of dutiestowardsthepublicwhichrelatestothelaw-breakingbehaviourofCranbrook
Company(.Further, this case can either be dealt inFederal court or in Administrative boards and tribunals. Part B In the constitutional law of Canada, the paramountcy doctrine has stated that when there is the presence of conflict among valid provincial and federal laws, then the federal law would exist and the provincial law would be effective to the scale that it does the confliction with the federal law(Brouillet& Ryder, 2017). In accordance with the doctrine, the present case will be addressed in the federal court, due to the paramount of the paramount thelaw- breaking behaviour of Cranbrook Company. Further; provisions of Canadian company law and corporate governance will be applied to resolve the issue. Part C In the present era, there is a constant issue of scarcity of natural resources and increasing adverse impact on the environment of nature. However, irrational decisions of companies are making this situation worst. Therefore as per Ktunaxa’s Stewardship Principles, for future sustainability, it is important for companies to consider the requirements of future generation along with their present needs. Voluntary responsibility will not be a sufficient solution for this issue. Therefore, compulsory provisions are required to be issued under corporate governance norms. With these norms, companies must be penalised with the substantial fine to set an example for other companies and such actions can be avoided. This responsibility should be provided state jurisdiction as they can be aware of the situation in a better manner. QUESTION 3 It is essential that the founder of bike guiding business considers the legal risks and its impact on the business from the start, so as to reduce the chances of the same.There are various legal risks that engage in any business, and these can come in the form of mistakes that are ineffective in terms of costs, time and contributions, and even can also damage the reputation and relationship. Further, it is advised to the founder of bike guiding business, that they are required to prepare a legal risk management plan, with a detailed action plan for addressing legal risks engaged in the business operations(Olson & Wu, 2015). It is also recommended that the business must consider the manager collaboration and corporation at each level and must make use of various risk mitigation methods and strategies to reduce the impact at the minimum level.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
When it comes to the business of bike guiding, there is a requirement of well-versed insurance, secured education regarding cycling, and schedule of maintenance and bike usage parameters and safety gear, so these all aspects are to be assured by the business to be successful and secured in the industry, The best method is to have a carefully developed plan that is inclusive of all the aspects that business can consider in reducing the legal risks. The liability of the company and the risk management plan should be inclusive of concerned tactics meant for bike security, constant employee communication, secured cycling education, insurance, maintenance and repair of bike, helmets, light, employee engagement requirements,system for check in and out, employee contracts, program process and policies and tips for navigation(Văduva, Alistar, Thomas, Lupiţu & Neagoie, 2016). Initially, the business is required make the identification of the legal risks, and then critically evaluates the same risks and following to this plan a risk management plan and lastly executes the effective risks management plan(Sadgrove, 2016). The cited business can do the legal environment by considering the legal environment, development of a risk management plan, responding timely to the changes held in the risk environment and mitigating the legal services. RisksSeverityImpact Safety lawsHighIfthereisnoproper compliancetowardsthe safety, then anyone can file a case and by this business can suffer fromlarger fines and damaged the reputation InsuranceHighIfthereisnoproper insuranceforthebusiness anditsbikesthenthe damagethatadversely impacts the business and call forthehigheramountof costs to offset the same. ResourcesMediumIftherewouldbethe
absence of skilled staff and resources, then the business would be able to get success. QUESTION 4 Part A At my previous workplace, I had witnessed significant dispute among senior manager and union trade leader. Union trade leaders were asking for pay raise, but the company were not in favour of demand made by them due to reduced profits. As a consequence of argument, union leader had provided the threat of a strike which can cause significant loss to business as their operations will get adversely affected. To resolve the cited issue, four methods are as follows: Litigation Mediation Negotiation Arbitration Part B For the cited dispute, a method of arbitration will be more feasible as the procedure is similar to litigation and decision provided by the arbitrator is binding for both the parties. The process to resolve above cited dispute by making use of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to litigation are enumerated as below: In Arbitration, a third individual or party who makes decisions known as an arbitrator will be invited to hear the arguments of both the parties. It is generally as same as litigation wherein it contains hearing at where their representatives or the parties create obedience and the resolution is outside the reach and supervision of parties (Carbonneau, 2015). As compared to the litigation, Arbitration is considered more informal, and generally, this is proposed to offers less time-consuming, streamlined and cost-effectual method for the intention of solving their possible lawful issues. The arbitration process is established union leader received the notice from the company aiming to the judgment of a dispute, informing the parties regarding the nature and base of the proceeding. After then the second party takes little time for answering the notice in terms
of writing, it represents that either the party is accepted to solve this argument through arbitration or not. Once an argument is solved with the help of arbitration, the procedure of arbitration is started, that depends on the rules, regulations and processes that are chosen by the parties or that is particularly mentioned in the contract (Morgan, 2018). If the parties create any type ofdisputes earlier than the arbitrator, then it calls to their eyewitness and then presents the proof for and against the cases. The rules and regulations of both arbitrator and courtroom are different from each other, nevertheless, and chances of cross-examining or queries of the witness might be more restricted. After the completion of hearing, a certain period of time is given to an arbitrator for thinking about the decisions and then creates a ruling. Part C In the case where the dispute will not be resolved by the application of the arbitration process then the company will union leaders may file for litigation process for claiming their right. In this form of resolving the dispute, the company will get a chance to defend themselves by keeping their point of view and on the basis of the arguments of the parties decision will be taken by the court of law. QUESTION 5 A contract refers to an agreement between two or more parties, which is enforceable by law (Andrews, 2015). A contract is said to be valid only if it comprises the following five aspects: Offer and acceptance lawful purpose capacity and consent Consideration In a valid contract, offer, acceptance and consideration are considered to be significant aspects. Firstly: an offer is made only in a situation where all the cited essential is included in the agreement. Secondly, this offer becomes binding with the acceptance of the other party. Thirdly, this offer and acceptance must be something of value (i.e. either monetary or non- monetary) to be interchanged among parties with their consent (Stoica and Bostan, 2015). For forming a valid contract, both the parties should have the capacity to comprehend the contractual nature and the terms. Both the parties involved in the contract should provide their free consent, or agree towards the terms that are mentioned in an agreement. Last but
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
not the least, each contract initiated in Canada should be supported by a lawful objective or purpose; or in simple words, contract term may not violate any law (O'Sullivan, and Hilliard, 2016). QUESTION 6 Part A In the given case situation, Arjun is required to make modifications in the contractual terms to meet up the expectations for his wife. As per the provisions of traditional contract law, initially, Arjun is required to provide an offer to the WeBuild4U Inc. with modified terms supported by clear consideration. Given the offer is required to be accepted by WeBuild4U Inc. to make it enforceable. Part B A modern approach to resolve situation described in Part A is enumerated as below: As per Modern doctrine, an action conducted prior to providing promise to make a payment or to confer any other benefit in against for the performance provided. In this Arjun is required to satisfy the following three requirements: The act shall be conduct at the request of the promisor, i.e. Arjun. Thereshallbe anunderstandingbetween partiesthattheact wasrequiredto be remunerated by payment orby conferment by considering some other advantages. Payment or the benefit’s conferment shall beenforceable lawfully which is in advance been promised. QUESTION 7 Part A Consideration is considered as a value in terms of law shifting from the promisee that does the agreement invoke. It generally comes in the form of a benefit meant forthe promisor to the promise(Barnett & Oman, 2016).As per the contract law, there is the absence of a contract, is there is the absence of consideration. On the other hand, the consideration does not require to quantify or quantifiable in a financial way. Also, any of the discernible detriment towards the parties can be the consideration of that party.
Part B There is the presence of one exemption to the need ofconsideration,and it is adeed, which is stated as either anunder sealor aspeciality contract.Further, deeds are generally used in contracts that are engaged in real estate(Albert, 2015).In a situation where a contract is seen as a deed, then there will be no requirement of consideration.
REFERENCES Albert,R.(2015).TheTheoryandDoctrineofUnconstitutionalAmendmentin Canada.Queen's LJ,41, 143. Andrews, N. (2015).Contract law. Cambridge University Press. Barnett, R. E., & Oman, N. B. (2016).Contracts: Cases and Doctrine. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. Brouillet, E., & Ryder, B. (2017). Key Doctrines in Canadian Legal Federalism.The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution, 415. Carbonneau, T. E. (2015).Cases and Materials on Arbitration Law and Practice. West Academic Publishing. Daly, P. (2015). The Principle of Stare Decisis in Canadian Administrative Law.RJT ns,49, 757. LawConnection,(2018).TheRoleofJudges–Backgrounder.Retrievedfrom http://www.lawconnection.ca/content/role-judges-backgrounder. Morgan, R. (2018). Book Review: Williams & Kawharu on Arbitration.Asian Dispute Review,20(2), 97-98. Olson, D. L., & Wu, D. D. (2015).Enterprise risk management(Vol. 3). World Scientific Publishing Company. O'Sullivan, J., & Hilliard, J. (2016).The law of contract. Oxford University Press. Ryngaert, C. (2015).Jurisdiction in international law. OUP Oxford. Sadgrove, K. (2016).The complete guide to business risk management. Routledge. Stoica, A., &Bostan, I. (2015). The relative conditions for the valid conclusion of a contract, under the New Civil Code.ActaUniversitatis George Bacovia. Juridica,4(2), 511- 530. Văduva, S., Alistar, V. T., Thomas, A. R., Lupiţu, C. D., & Neagoie, D. S. (2016). Management of Risks. InMoral Leadership in Business(pp. 77-92). Springer, Cham.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser