Business Law Assignment

Running head: BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT
1
Business Law Assignment
Name
Institution

BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT 2
Issues
The issues in this matter include:
1. Whether try and save is obligated to let Donald purchase kettle at the discounted
price?
2. Whether the agreement between Donald and the manager is binding?
3. Whether the store has a legal obligation to find a stock of the toaster they advertised
and supply Donald with one of them?
4. Which remedies is Donald entitled to if any?
Legal principles and authority
Sales of Goods Act
Contract law act
Common law
Implied terms and conditions
Application
Try and Save advertised a toaster and failed to notify the public that the toaster advertised
had run out of stock and discontinued.
This was a case of an invitation to treat and Donald accepted the offer upon which the
store was obligated to provide the toaster they advertised upon the customer’s request (Taylor
and Taylor, 2017). In the event that the good advertised had run out of stock they were
supposed to notify the public of the same in good time (Fulford, 2017). There are implied
terms under the sale of goods stipulating the duties of the offeror and the offeree in all
transactions as expounded in Fisher vs. Bell. Therefore, Try and Save is supposed to find
another stock for Donald as an obligation on their part. Donald can sue Try and Save for
damages.