This assignment delves into the concept of unconscionable conduct within contract law. It presents a hypothetical case involving Rofi, a refugee with limited English proficiency, entering into a contract with Bolton Connect Pty Ltd through their agent, John. The analysis examines whether John's actions constituted unconscionable conduct by exploiting Rofi's language disadvantage and lack of understanding during the contracting process. Key legal provisions, landmark cases (Blomley v Ryan, Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio, Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd, Louth v Diprose), and the Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 are used to evaluate the situation and determine whether Rofi has grounds to rescind the contract.
![[object Object]](/_next/image/?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Flogo.6d15ce61.png&w=640&q=75){kind=small}
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
