Business Law

Running head: BUSINESS LAW
Business Law
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1BUSINESS LAW
Table of Contents
1. Potential Plaintiffs of the case................................................................................................2
2. Defendant...............................................................................................................................2
3. Remedies for the Plaintiffs.....................................................................................................3
4. Defences for the Defendant....................................................................................................4
5. The winning decision.............................................................................................................5
References..................................................................................................................................6

2BUSINESS LAW
1. Potential Plaintiffs of the case
In the given case study, the following person or group of person can potentially be the
plaintiffs:
a) Davis
b) Yang Family
c) Parm
2. Defendant
a) Davis is a potential plaintiff who can bring an action under law of Torts accusing the Yang
family for nuisance. Nuisance refers to the trouble annoyance or injury caused upon the
aggrieved party who is deprived from enjoying his land peacefully. The depreciation is of
such degree that the aggrieved party e has no other option but to bring a legal action under
law of torts. Davis can bring an action against the Yang family for affecting his use or
enjoyment of his property or land (Cornford 2016).
b) The Yang family could be a plaintiff who could sue the real estate company for
deceiving them by not disclosing material fact about the property, that it had a municipal
easement at the rear end.
c) The Yang family could also sue Davis:
 Firstly, for false imprisonment and trespass to land that he had caused when he had
locked the children while they were having a noisy gathering in the shed.
 Secondly, for defaming the Yang family by calling them “neighbours from hell” on
social media, thereby maligning the social prestige of the family.
 Lastly, for Assault that he caused to the children when he went to the yard swearing
at them, holding a machete in his hand and threatening to cut the children into pieces.