logo

Business Law: Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market & East v Maurer

13 Pages2122 Words439 Views
   

Added on  2023-06-05

About This Document

This article discusses the laws of tenancy and lease, fraudulent misrepresentation, and consumer law in Australia through the cases of Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market and East v Maurer.

Business Law: Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market & East v Maurer

   Added on 2023-06-05

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: BUSINESS LAW
Business Law
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Business Law: Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market & East v Maurer_1
1BUSINESS LAW
Table of Contents
PART C...........................................................................................................................................2
Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market (Campbelltown) Pty
limited [2008] HCA 10; 234 CLR 237........................................................................................2
Issue.........................................................................................................................................2
Rule..........................................................................................................................................2
Application..............................................................................................................................4
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................4
PART D...........................................................................................................................................7
East v Maurer [1991] 2 All ER 733.............................................................................................7
Issue.........................................................................................................................................7
Rule..........................................................................................................................................7
Application..............................................................................................................................9
Conclusion.............................................................................................................................10
Business Law: Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market & East v Maurer_2
2BUSINESS LAW
Business Law: Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market & East v Maurer_3
3BUSINESS LAW
PART C
Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market
(Campbelltown) Pty limited [2008] HCA 10; 234 CLR 237
Issue
Termination of a commercial lease due to the failure of payment by the lessee because of
expiration of the sub-lease for which it was responsible.
Rule
A tenant must comply with the terms and condition of the commercial lease. A
commercial lease lays down the rights and duties of the lessor and the lessee, the former is the
owner of the property while the latter has agreed to lease that property. It is the primary rule of
any form of tenancy that a tenant or a lessee would pay the rent amount without failure 1. In
general, commercial leases are prepared on different bases, like:
Base rent, without outgoings;
Base rent, without outgoings;
Base rent, with a sales percentage
Rent along with fixed percentage, market review based on CPI measure2.
1 Collins, Toni Leah. "The doctrine of frustration, commercial leases and the Canterbury earthquakes." (2016).
2 Duncan, William D., and Sharon A. Christensen. Commercial leases in Australia. Thosmson Reuter, 2017.
Business Law: Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market & East v Maurer_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Australian Commercial Law: Lease Termination, Consumer Law Breach, Contractual Restraint
|9
|2367
|470

Significance of Gumland Property Holdings Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Market (Campbelltown) Pty Limited [2008] in Australian Commercial Law
|12
|2843
|284