Trusted by 2+ million users, 1000+ happy students everyday
Business Law
Table of ContentsQUESTION 1...................................................................................................................................1QUESTION 2...................................................................................................................................1a...................................................................................................................................................1b...................................................................................................................................................1QUESTION 3...................................................................................................................................2QUESTION 4...................................................................................................................................2QUESTION 5...................................................................................................................................3QUESTION 6...................................................................................................................................4QUESTION 7...................................................................................................................................4REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
QUESTION 1Issue: To determine the applicability of case decision of Ermogenous v Greek OrthodoxCommunity in the future decision related with presumptions in domestic, social and commercialagreements?Rule:The case of Ermogenous v Greek OrthodoxCommunity was decided in the Supremecourt in 2002 with identify in the legal relationship between an incorporated association theGreek Orthodox Community of SA and Ermorgenous (archbishop). The decision held that theagreement between the church and archbishop has a legal intention to have a legal employmentcontract. The case was decided on the basis of facts presented at that time (Ermogenous v GreekOrthodox Community of SA Inc, 2018). However, it is argued that contract with a religiousministers may not be considered to be a legally binding contract. Exemptions can be made whena non religious corporation makes the contract considered to be contract with monetarycompensation and other financial favor to minister or in the case of archbishop.Application and conclusion:The application can be made in future decision as the ruling must be considered whenmonetary issues and archbishop is involved in the case scenario. For the other cases withreligious ministers do not have intention of creating legal intention. All the evidences present inthe above rule section will be considered before giving a decision.QUESTION 2a.Issue: effect of a documents and is jurisdiction Rule: The document do not establish a legal binding contract between the parties and this notarise enforceability of law through the court's jurisdiction.Application and conclusion:The document is not a legally binding written documents and no party van seek ant legal remedythrough this document under a court.b.Issue: effect of court power and jurisdiction
Found this document preview useful?
You are reading a preview Upload your documents to download or Become a Desklib member to get accesss