BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY1 Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................2 Dining consumption in the restaurant..............................................................................................2 Commonalities.................................................................................................................................3 Differences.......................................................................................................................................3 Limitations.......................................................................................................................................4 Future Direction...............................................................................................................................4 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................5 References........................................................................................................................................6
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY2 Introduction Therestaurantsdiffers much in appearance as well as offerings, including a wide variety ofcuisinesandservicemodels ranging from inexpensivefast food restaurantsandcafeterias, to mid-pricedfamily restaurants, to high-priced luxury establishments(Ukenna et al., 2018).In this report, the four articles are selected for the review that isBharath Josiam and Charles Foster, 2009 “Nutritional information on restaurant menus: Who cares and why restaurateurs should bother”, AlexanderSchjolla and Frode Alfnes 2017 “Eliciting consumer preferences for credence attributes in a fine-dining restaurant”. Ezgi Erkmenand Murat Hancer “Building brand relationshipforrestaurants:Anexaminationofothercustomers,brandimage,trust,and restaurant attributes”, CHEN, Annie , PENG, Norman and HUNG, Kuang-peng “The effects of luxuryrestaurantenvironmentsondiners’emotionsandloyalty:incorporatingdiner expectationsintoan extendedMehrabian-Russell model”.In this, thecommonalitiesand differences between these articles are discussed. Dining consumption in the restaurant The restaurants are operating within the theory of dining consumption; it is done to provide satisfaction to the consumers. Nowadays, restaurants relatively offer higher value as well as motivate the customers by satisfying the particular needs and requirements of the customers from a perception of behavioral economics(Mathur & Gupta, 2019).The supervisors as well as executives from the fine dining restaurant and from the other restaurants understands the wants as well as requirement of the consumers, but many of the managers were not succeed in recognizing the accurate requirements, through this it become difficult for the restaurants to provide satisfaction to them. The theory has developed in the present years, it is due to because previously the focal point of the managers was on providing the food and services to the consumer within time. However, now the restaurant offers several services like flying services and family services to encourage the consumers(Waldfogel, 2019).The several restaurants like family-style restaurants developed currently, which provides casual eateries as well as offer higher quality food.
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 Commonalities The objective of the study is common that is Josiam et al aim of the study is to determine the needs and wants of the customers as well as their behavior and attitudes to the nutritional information on the list of the menus in the restaurants which provide full-service(Josiam & Foster, 2009).The one of the objective for conducting the study, by Schjolla et al is to examine the behavior of the consumer regarding the information on the menu description in a Norwegian restaurant, which provides full-services to the customers. Erkmen et al aim of the study is to examine the role as well as behavior of other customers. The study is conducted with the conceptual model to understand the attitudes of the customers as well as their preferences of the brand for the fine dining restaurants(Erkmen & Hancer, 2019).The objective of Chen et al is to know the diners consumption behavior of the customer in the luxuries restaurants by integrating the expectations of the diner into a personalized Mehrabian–Russell model. In these articles the similarities is that these study is conduced to know the attitudes and behaviors of the customers. Differences The study also has various differences, which is differences in using the methods for collecting the data, limitations, findings etc. Josiam et al used the questionnaire method for collecting the data from the customers who all consume the food in restaurants, which provides full- service. The survey was also taken from the universities in USA. In the other study conducted by Schjolla et al in the fine-dining restaurant, it is done with the experiment of menu labeling in the normal hours of opening throughout the two weeks(Schjøll & Alfnes, 2017).The menu tagging experiment is done in the restaurants by changing the description of the menu continuously and then the results from this alteration are examined(Du et al., 2019).Erkmen et al used the quantitative research method for conducting the study by using the model of structural equation; this is done to understand the character of the customers along with the characteristics of other restaurants. The data collection is done from the questionnaire and the survey was done from the consumers of fine-dining restaurants(Erkmen & Hancer, 2019).Chen et al collected the data by using both the approaches that is quantitative as well as qualitative. The qualitative method is used by preparing the questions for the costumers who all dined in the luxury restaurants.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY4 The findings of the studies were also different, Josiam et al finds that the consumers who eat healthy food the more concerned about the information of nutritional in the menu description. The researcher also finds majorly most of the women’s between the age group of 35-65 as well as high-income group person needs nutritional information in the menus of restaurants(Josiam & Foster, 2009).Schjolla et al finds that addition the words, which are organic as well as description of the animal welfare, has less effect on the choices of the customers in the restaurants. Erkmen et al finds that all the attributes of the restaurant except other consumers shows the satisfaction level of the customers, only the quality of the services quality plays a major role in appearing the image of the brands. Chen et al finds that the positive as well as negative behaviors of the restaurants impacts the loyalty of consumers in respect to luxury restaurants(CHEN et al., 2015). Limitations The studies have several limitations, which includes that Josiam et al only focuses on the student run restaurants in the campus of universities, it only focuses on one location. Schjolla et al also focused their study in the restaurants, which provides full services to the customer, in Norwegian restaurant(Schjøll & Alfnes, 2017).However, the researcher does not conduct comparative study between other restaurants. Erkmen et al study has conflicting findings that is the cause of food quality as well as atmosphere of the restaurants on developing the image of the brand. Chen et al one objective is to find the behaviors of ethnic groups but sample size was too small, which does not provide accurate findings. Future Direction The above studies does not focuses on the various factors that is Josiam et al does not focus on providing the information about the personal health of the consumers as well as their behavior in the food lifestyle. Schjolla et al only use experiment of menu labeling, so in future the researcher can use the natural ground experiments in the full- services restaurants and can conduct the comparative study. Erkmen et al, in future could experiment the anticipated effect in the another communitygroupsto knowtheimpactof thecultureon diningconsumptioninluxury restaurants. Chen et al does not focuses on the particular dining that is dining with the family
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY5 members, so for this future research can add this by reviewing the hospitality literature in different circumstances of consumption in the luxury restaurants. Conclusion From the above it is concludes that,therestaurantsdiffers in the appearance as well as providing various services to the customers. The dining consumption in the restaurants is important to study because it directly connected with the sales as well as profitability of the restaurants. From the above it also conclude that the aim of the studies is similar that is to know the behavior and attitudes of the consumers. The differences show that the researcher use different methods for data collection, the study also have different limitations. In future researcher can conduct the comparative study as well as can also take the behaviors of different cultural groups.
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY6 References CHEN, A., PENG, N. & HUNG, K.p., 2015. he effects of luxury restaurant environments on diners’ emotions and loyalty: incorporating diner expectations into an extended Mehrabian- Russell model.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(2), pp.236- 60. Du, D. et al., 2019. ElemCor: accurate data analysis and enrichment calculation for high- resolution LC-MS stable isotope labeling experiments.BMC bioinformatics, 20(1), p.89. Erkmen, E. & Hancer, M., 2019. Building brand relationship for restaurants: An examination of othercustomers,brandimage,trust,andrestaurantattributes..InternationalJournalof Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), pp.1469-87. Josiam, B. & Foster, C., 2009. Nutritional information on restaurant menus restaurant menus bother.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(7), pp.876-91. Mathur, T. & Gupta, A., 2019. Impact of ‘Dining atmospherics’ and ‘Percived food-quality’on customer re-patronage intention in fast-casual restaurants.Tourism and hospitality management, 25(1), pp.1-25. Schjøll, A. & Alfnes, F., 2017. Eliciting consumer preferences for credence attributes in a fine- dining restaurant.British Food Journal, 119(3), pp.575-86. Ukenna, S.I., Ogbari, M.E., Adeola, A. & Nkamnebe, A.D., 2018. Applying the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict Sustainable Street Food Patronage: An Integrated Conceptual Framework.Journal of Business, 2(1). Waldfogel, J., 2019. Dining out as cultural trade.Journal of Cultural Economics, pp.1-30.