ARTICLE 1 LINKING INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE TO BUSINESS STRATEGY: THE PEOPLE PROCESS MODEL Gratton, L., and et.al., 1999. Linking individual performance to business strategy: The people process model.Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management.38(1). pp.17-31. Key Areas Article highlights the relationships between people and organizational goals. The link between people and organization are of different types. Through these links, organization convert an individual strategy into organizational performance and personal objective into organizational objectives. This article also tells about The people process model: Embedding transformational change. Review According to the author, there are 3 types of linkages between company's strategies and individual'sperformance.Strongerthelinkagebetweenindividualactivitiesandbusiness strategies, higher the chance for the organization to achieve its objectives (Rahimi, 2017). These 3 linkages are as follows - Vertical Linkage It refers to the relationships between business strategies, employee behaviour, teams and performance which is created by the Human Resource Strategies. This relationship are created by HR policies and procedures. Horizontal Linkage It refers to the relationships between key employees and managers of the company. This linkage ensures that there should be co-ordination between the activities of the key peoples of organization. Temporal Linkage There should be relationships between challenge of change and balancing of consistency which basically focus on the gaining of long term competitive advantages over competitors. It is called Temporal linkage (Andersén, 2017).
Company should use People Process Model in order to create co-ordination between individualperformanceandorganizationalobjectivesforthebeneficialofthecompany. According to this model, vertical linkage create performance better (performance management process) and horizontal linkage create the link with performance to the future (transformational process). Thus, for the dynamic relationships between both the processes, HR plays an important role by implementing strategies for delivering short term and long term organizational goals. Short term goals are such as ability to decide the objectives which is connected to the business strategy, ability to decide the parameters for the measurement of performance, ability to give rewards for the better performance and ability to provide short term training. Long term goals are as creating better leaders for the company, converting the workforce skills and aspirations into long term goals and creating organizational structure which can help in success of company for long term (Gratton and et.al., 1999). Findings Article concludes that organization and individual are different which leads to creation of differentiation between their objectives. To mitigates the gap between objectives, Company use People Process Model and HR is the core of this model. ARTICLE 2 DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCE Bhattacharyya, S.S., 2019. Development of an Integrated Model of Strategic Alliance. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations.54(3). Key Areas Article highlights the integrated framework for strategic alliance in order to prevent the failure of collaboration between companies. This article tell about the elements which needed to be analysis before doing collaboration with any firm working in any industry. Review Strategic alliance refers to the term which defines the partnership between companies for some purpose such as to become number one in industry, to sustain the business for longer time, to mitigate the industrial risks and earn more return or to beat the cut-throat competition (Serrat, 2017).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Before integrated model of strategic alliance, strategic alliance between companies were failing due to so many factors. In all those factors, environmental factors played a major role in the failure. Thus, before doing strategic alliance, both companies should do environmental scanning. There are three types of environment which not only affect the strategies of the companies but also affect the whole industry in which companies are working. Three types of environment are as follows - Broad Environment Thisenvironmentconsistsofpolitical,social,ethical,environmental,cultural, economical and technological factors. Because these factors create trends not only for the firms, but also for the entire industry. Change in these factors change the whole trend for the company which lead to change the whole industry. Industry Environment This environment consists of 3 dimensions such as Bargaining Power (Buyer and Suppliers), Threat of Entry and substitutes and Rivalry between competitive firms. These all factors impact the industry by no. of firms, their profitability, risks and return trade off and their entrance and exit from the industry. Competitive Environment Competitive environment consists of external environment in which firm works and competes with its competitors. Factors of this environment are as follows - business's direct competitors, regulatory sources, indirect competitors and social and technological changes etc. (Harrigan, 2017). Analysis and scanning of these factors and environments help companies to understand the nature of business, industries and the extent to which these factors can affect the business's strategies and operations. Findings Article concludes that environment and its factors play a decisive role in determination of companies' strategies failure or success, which further decide the firm's failure and success. ARTICLE 3 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGIES
Cretu, R.F., 2012. Corporate governance and corporate diversification strategies.Revista de Management Comparat Internațional.13(4). pp.621-633. Key Areas There is generally conflicts between company' objectives and shareholders' objectives regardingcreationofvalues.ThisarticlehighlightstherelationshipbetweenCorporate governance and corporate diversification. Review There are two approach to understand the meaning of corporate governance. These two approachare–NarrowApproachandBroadApproach.Innarrowapproach,corporate governance means fulfilment of investors' interest by following economic and legislative duties. In broad approach, corporate governance refers to the standards and approaches that protect and co-ordinate the interests of all the stakeholders of the company (Tricker, 2015). Diversification is the strategy which is adopted by company for the development and growth of its business. In this strategy, company enters into new market with the new products. The benefits from this strategy are as follows – reduction in risk, increase in market shares, increase in operational and financial synergies, tax reductions, increase in profits and economies gains etc. Thereisacausalityrelationshipsbetweendiversificationstrategyandcorporate governance. Companies take strategic decisions regarding creation of values on the basis of stakeholders' interests. It is managers' duty to create value for organization. For the value creation, company needs to maximize its wealth (profits). For the wealth (profits) maximization, company need to focus on its profit maximization objectives so that they can sustain their business in competitive environment. But for the achievement of objective, company can't do cheating or fraud or using wrong practices or misrepresentation of data (Wang and Sarkis, 2017). Companies'realownersareitsshareholderswhogivetheirresources(economic resources) to the company to operate the business. Thus, it is company's duty to earn profit for stakeholders in moral way.So that company can earn profits as well as effectively run its business in this competitive advantages. The gain of competitive advantages can be done doing various diversification strategies in order to fulfil the needs and wants of the shareholders as well as customers.
Findings Today's environment is more competitive for the companies. Only those companies can survive who expand its business but without hurting the interest of stakeholders and community. REFERENCES Andersén, J., 2017. What about the employees in entrepreneurial firms? A multi-level analysis of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, role ambiguity, and social support. International Small Business Journal.35(8). pp.969-990. Harrigan, K.R., 2017. Strategic alliances as agents of competitive change. InCollaborative Strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing. Rahimi, R., 2017. Customer relationship management (people, process and technology) and organisationalcultureinhotels:Whichtraitsmatter?.InternationalJournalof Contemporary Hospitality Management.29(5). pp.1380-1402. Serrat, O., 2017. Learning in strategic alliances. InKnowledge Solutions.(pp. 639-647). Springer, Singapore. Tricker, B., 2015.Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA. Wang, Z. and Sarkis, J., 2017. Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance.Journal of Cleaner Production.162.pp.1607-1616.