Proposal for Transparent Policy in Business Taxation and Law
Verified
Added on 2022/12/30
|9
|2787
|78
AI Summary
This proposal discusses the implementation of a transparent policy in business taxation and law, focusing on encouraging domestic companies to opt for fiscal transparency for income tax purposes. It provides details on the variants to be incorporated in the proposal and how it can benefit domestically-incorporated entities.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Business Taxation and Law
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................3 Methodology..............................................................................................................................3 Literature review........................................................................................................................3 Proposal......................................................................................................................................5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................8 Bibliography...............................................................................................................................9
Introduction The tax status of an organization does have significant importance in taxation law. It is the basis on which provisions relating to taxation are ascertained for calculating tax liability. Presentstudy relatesto discussion relatingto theproposalof transparentpolicy, i.e. encouraging domestic companies to opt to be fiscally transparent for income tax purpose has been discussed in present proposal. The present proposal provides details relating to variants which should be incorporated in proposal along with the manner to develop proposal relating to an ‘opted’ in fiscally transpired private company might look like. Methodology The present study is primarily based on secondary sources to provide proposal to regulatory authorities of Australia. Systematic research has been done to evaluate current tax approach for domestic companies and the scheme which government wants to implement. Authentic sources have been considered for literature review, and the same has been supported by proper citations. Literature review Taxable entities which are either incorporated in Australia or carry on business in Australia (central management exists in Australia, or voting power is under control of Australian resident shareholders) are considered as Australian resident for tax purpose. In accordance with section 1.1.1 of ITAA 1997, a company is “a body corporate or an unincorporated association or body of person other than partnership or joint venture”. An organization which is covered under the definition of taxable entity is classified as an entity for Australian income tax purpose whether mandatory or optional1. The principal taxes applicable to domestic companies are income tax (including taxes on capital gains) and GST.A resident company is liable for company income tax at a rate of 30%. A lower rate of 27.5% is also applicable for companies having annual turnover less than specified limits. Assessable income is calculated to ascertain taxable income for each year which is reduced by allowable 1Kirchler,andHoelzl."16TaxBehaviour."(2018).1(1)CENTREFORDECISION RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS, UK255.
deductions in order to attain taxable income2. The Australian tax system is having a broad tax treatynetworkwhichisfollowedbyOrganizationforEconomicCooperationand Developmentmodel treaty. The main issue evolved relating to fiscal transparency is the income tax is that it is applied by separate law as an individual income tax law and corporate income tax law3. In other words, it can be stated that physical and legal person is taxed under same law but governed under different norms, i.e. separate tax rates and separate schedules. Through ensuring corporate taxpayers to pay off their fair share, public could be assured relating to essential services of which Australian’s rely4. Even difference between tax which should have been collected but was not collected, decreased to 4.4% or $1.8billion. The reason behind same was difference in interpretation of complex provision relating to taxation. The tax office transparency culture includes all companies with turnover of more than $100 million5. But the companies with income of more than $5 billion represent only two percent of corporate transparency population but liable of 57% or $26 billion of tax paid6. Thus, the transparent policy should be formed in such manner so that it is easily acceptable as well as understand by the domestically – incorporated entities. Further, it is necessary to add on few taxation benefits with same so that more corporation could be encouraged to be part of it. Authorities require 2Stephen Phua,."Convergence in global tax compliance."(2015).12.Sing. J. Legal Stud.: 77. 3Liam Stanley and Hartman K. Todd. "Tax preferences, fiscal transparency, and the meaning of welfare: An experimental study."(2018). 12 .Political Studies66.4 : 830-850. 4L. Jeffrey Hoopes, Robinson Leslie, and Slemrod Joel."Public tax-return disclosure."(2018). 15.Journal of Accounting and Economics66.1, 142-162. 5ShaneWrightand ErykBagshaw.One in four of Australia's largest companies paid no tax last year . (13thDecember 2018). <https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/one-in- four-of-australia-s-largest-companies-paid-no-tax-last-year-20181213-p50m0i.html> 6Shane Wrightand ErykBagshaw.One in four of Australia's largest companies paid no tax last year . (13thDecember 2018). <https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/one-in- four-of-australia-s-largest-companies-paid-no-tax-last-year-20181213-p50m0i.html>
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
emphasizing on closure of tax loopholes in order to increase the percentile of tax holders to accept the new proposal. As main emphasis is on tax bracket in relation to individual taxpayers, in same manner threshold limit is the main element in case of corporation7. Thus, turnover taxes framework could be used in order to develop the new proposal. The authorities are required to focus on tax arrangements which lead corporate to avoid paying taxes as well as the tax loopholes in order to enhance the efficiency of new proposal. Proposal Overview As per the taxation law, the eligibility of the company as a taxpayer plays a significant role. Thus, through framing easy provisions, domestic companies could be motivated to accept proposal of transparent policy. At the time of determination of corporate income tax, the status of an entity is important. Further, by considering the viewpoint of shareholders or members of the company, recognition of the company as taxable one will generally have the impact that profit generated by the company will taxable in the hands of company instead of the shareholders of company.As above explained in literature review, in order to encourage taxpayers it is necessary to provide them advantages for accepting transparent proposal. Above stated initiative could be one for same.However, in case transparent company, Income or losses generated by company is allocated to the members of company. In Australia, the concept of transparent company is growing significantly for enactment. The origin of the transparent company is outside the company, but it has same features as the separate legal entity. Further, the liability of the members is also limited8. However, the taxation rules on transparent company are like general partnership firm. Therefore, the profit or loss of the company is directly apportioned to the members of company. 7Sigrid Hemels,."Tax Incentives as a Creative Industries Policy Instrument."(2017). 14.Tax Incentives for the Creative Industries. Springer, Australia.. 33-64. 8Lopo , Antonio Martinez. "Tax aggressiveness: a literature survey."(2017)15.Revista de Educação e PesquisaemContabilidade11, 151-167.
A general approach can be initiated by the regulated authorities in which taxation by which income is taxed on the basis of owners rather than the level of the entity9. Another approach whichcanbecompliedispartialflow-throughtreatmentasentity,incomewhichis distributed to beneficiaries and remaining profits to be taxed on the basis of entity level. Initially policies should be developed in a form that each organization is required to be registered under to option of transparency taxation policy10. The partial approach can be considered as more appropriate as a significant amount of income of all tax holders will be computed on the basis of similar provision or norms. It could be a nominal amount of percentage of tax on gross sales.It can be done through applying same provision so that issues faced by tax holder relating to separate laws could be resolved. Approaches and recommendations It is important for the government to define properly, the transparent entities and non- transparent entities for the taxation purpose.A company which pays off actual tax liability or present true profit in books of accounts can be referred transpired in general manner. It is necessary for government to define same with easy provision so that companies can ascertain their specific status.Therefore, it is recommended to the government to make the rules for classification by which certainty can be achieved in this aspect. Moreover, it is essential for the government of Australia to make the taxation system in such a way by which the overseas investing company does not affect adversely.The government should make the proposal in such a manner which assists in enhancement of tax neutrality. For this, it is recommended that government should prescribe the special rates as per the turnover of the company. By this, the burden of tax payment on the small and medium-sized company will reduce. Further, certain amount of exemption limit for the taxation is also proposed by the government, by 9Agustin Redonda and et al. "Tax expenditure and the treatment of tax incentives for investment."(2019).1(1).Economics:TheOpen-Access,Open-AssessmentE- Journal13.2019-12. 10Al-Maghrebi,SalehMohammed,AhmadRiayati,andPalilRizalMohd."Budget TransparencyandTaxAwarenesstowardsTaxCompliance:AConceptual Approach."(2016)11.Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Lawof Australia 10.1
this any type of compliance cost would not be incurred by the company which satisfies the criteriaofexemptionlimit.Inaddition,governmentshouldfindthewaysbywhich complexity should be reduced because the tax burden on profit lies with members of company, and on the other hand, ownership of assets and other is attributable to the business. Further, it has been observed that the compliance cost of taxation by transparent company is more than any other form of company; therefore it is recommended that special rate tax should be introduced which assist in reduction of cost so that public would like to adopt these type of taxation system. Along with the above aspect, the government of country should also prescribe the eligibility requirement of the transparent company. Further, the allocation of profit or loss rules should also be prescribed properly, so that unnecessarypressure of tax on the members of company get reduces. Further, attempt should be made by government to provide advantage to the entities which agree to opt for transparency policy. Through this manner it would be able to encourage more tax holders to be in favour of the policy. It is necessary that the provision and norms relating to new proposal should be easily acceptable as well as accessible. Acceptance and understanding can be referred as two core variants relating to increasing the percentile of acceptance of new proposal. As tax holders are already facing issues due to existing complex norms and provisions, thus it is necessary to focus on the manner in which norms relating to new proposal will be applied. Apart from the above aspect, it is recommended that government should properly prescribe the tax treaty norms for the transparent entities. Further, for the application of tax treaty rule, it is essential that whether the company will actually obtain the advantages of tax treaty and for this government should properly define the eligibility status for the companies for obtaining the benefit of tax treaty. Along with this, if the government is entered into the tax treaty treatment with another country, then protection can also be provided in case if the laws of two countries are not same. Since, in case of any discrepancy among the laws of two countries, then it may significantly affect because company may not avail the advantages of double taxation. Further, government should also consider the issues related with proper attribution of the profits generated by the transparent company, as it plays a significant role in practical situation. Further, it has been seen that, in case of transparent company, the tax is levy on the member of company, as the income is allocated on them, but it is recommended that government should make the rules in which tax is levy on the company itself instead of members. By this rule, the burden of tax will not imposed on them. Along with this, government can also implement the partial amount of distribution for the profit or losses. In
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
such case, members of the company have to pay only to some extent of tax amount, which assists in reduction in the tax burden. Further, by considering the conceptual approach, it is more reasonable that, company has to pay tax on the profits earned by it as it is considered as separate legal entity. The government should also make easy rules for the computation of tax liability, such as determination of tax on the basis of turnover. By this, companies encourage to adopt the changes which are beneficial for the country as well as organizations. Conclusion By considering the above analysis, it has been drawn that the status of any company plays a significant role in the imposition of taxation ruling. It has been observed that in case of transparent company, the profit or loss in allocated to the members of the company rather than the company itself. Above analysis shows the description regarding the proposal by the government. It is recommended that government should reduce the complexity in the taxation system of the transparent company. Since the allocation of profit or loss to members and the ownership of company lies with company create the difficulty for the companies. Therefore, by considering the above analysis, it is recommended that government should prescribe the particular rate of taxation for the companies. Further, this rate may be based on the turnover of company, which would be easy for compliance. Along with this, government may also enter with tax treaty agreement with other companies. By this company can avail the benefit of double taxation ruling, through which tax will not be paid by company or members twice on thesameincome.Moreover,itisalsorecommendedthatthegovernmentshould implement the partial flow treatment, in which income is distributed
Bibliography Al-Maghrebi,MohammedSaleh,RiayatiAhmad,andMohdRizalPalil."Budget TransparencyandTaxAwarenesstowardsTaxCompliance:AConceptual Approach."(2016) 11Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Lawof Australia 10.1 95-101. Hemels, Sigrid. "Tax Incentives as a Creative Industries Policy Instrument."(2017). 14.Tax Incentives for the Creative Industries.Springer, Australia. Hoopes, Jeffrey L., Leslie Robinson, and Joel Slemrod."Public tax-return disclosure."(2018). 15.Journal of Accounting and Economics66.1 Kirchler, Erich, and Erik Hoelzl."16 Tax Behaviour."(2018). 1(1)CENTRE FOR DECISION RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS, UK. Martinez, Antonio Lopo. "Tax aggressiveness: a literature survey."(2017)15Revista de Educação e PesquisaemContabilidade11 Phua, Stephen. "Convergence in global tax compliance."(2015).12.Sing. J. Legal Stud. Redonda,Agustin,etal."Taxexpenditureandthetreatmentoftaxincentivesfor investment."(2019).1(1).Economics:TheOpen-Access,Open-AssessmentE- Journal13.2019-12. Stanley, Liam, and Todd K. Hartman. "Tax preferences, fiscal transparency, and the meaning of welfare: An experimental study."Political Studies66.4. Wright., Shane., and BagshawEryk..One in four of Australia's largest companies paid no tax last year . (13thDecember 2018). <https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/one-in- four-of-australia-s-largest-companies-paid-no-tax-last-year-20181213-p50m0i.html>