CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES Payback Period (PBP) calculates the
Verified
Added on 2023/04/21
|3
|434
|322
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES Payback Period (PBP) calculates the time period by which the project is capable of recouping the initial investment made. The method is easy to apply and provides an overall idea about the cash richness of the project. However, PBP does not consider the time value of money (TVM) and hence may not be suitable for complex projects with more than 3 or 5 years duration (Woodruff, 2018). Net Present Value (NPV), on the other hand, considers the TVM in such a manner that the management gets a fair idea about the profitability of the project. Since NPV takes into consideration post-tax cash flow adding back depreciation, the method is suitable for evaluating the financial worth of a project in terms of its ability to revenue profit as well as cash flow. However, NPV is too much dependent on the discounting factor and the assumptions that the cash flow generated gets reinvested at the same rate (Magni & Martin, 2017). Moreover, the application of the technique is a bit complex. Lastly, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) may be construed to be the extension of NPV. In IRR, the management evaluates the discounting rate at which the NV of the project becomes zero. In other words, the IRR method puts more emphasis on the discounting factor and hence, the capital cost of the project. However, IRR may not be suitable where the project generates uneven cash flow year wise and change in discounting factor significantly affects the project’s cash flow performance (Abor, 2017). Therefore, it may be concluded that NPV is comparatively superior and a combined application of NPV and IRR may provide optimum result in terms of project evaluation. However, the
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
management must consider the TVM and other externalities as well before applying NPV and IRR. Page2of3
References: Abor, J. Y. (2017). Evaluating Capital Investment Decisions: Capital Budgeting. InEntrepreneurial Finance for MSMEs(pp. 293-320). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Magni, C. A., & Martin, J. (2017). The Reinvestment Rate Assumption Fallacy for IRR and NPV. Woodruff, J. (2018). Three Primary Methods Used to Make Capital Budgeting Decisions. Retrieved fromhttps://smallbusiness.chron.com/three-primary-methods-used-make- capital-budgeting-decisions-11570.html Page3of3