CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES Payback Period (PBP) calculates the

CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES
Payback Period (PBP) calculates the time period by which the project is capable of recouping the
initial investment made. The method is easy to apply and provides an overall idea about the cash
richness of the project. However, PBP does not consider the time value of money (TVM) and
hence may not be suitable for complex projects with more than 3 or 5 years duration (Woodruff,
2018).
Net Present Value (NPV), on the other hand, considers the TVM in such a manner that the
management gets a fair idea about the profitability of the project. Since NPV takes into
consideration post-tax cash flow adding back depreciation, the method is suitable for evaluating
the financial worth of a project in terms of its ability to revenue profit as well as cash flow.
However, NPV is too much dependent on the discounting factor and the assumptions that the
cash flow generated gets reinvested at the same rate (Magni & Martin, 2017). Moreover, the
application of the technique is a bit complex.
Lastly, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) may be construed to be the extension of NPV. In IRR,
the management evaluates the discounting rate at which the NV of the project becomes zero. In
other words, the IRR method puts more emphasis on the discounting factor and hence, the capital
cost of the project. However, IRR may not be suitable where the project generates uneven cash
flow year wise and change in discounting factor significantly affects the project’s cash flow
performance (Abor, 2017).
Therefore, it may be concluded that NPV is comparatively superior and a combined application
of NPV and IRR may provide optimum result in terms of project evaluation. However, the