This article discusses the arguments against capital punishment and why it should be abolished. It explores the issues of innocence, retribution, the right to live, and the failure to deter. It also examines the brutality of capital punishment and its ineffectiveness in reducing crime rates.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE ABOLISHED 1 Abolishment of Capital Punishment Students Name Professors Name Institution Affiliation
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Capital Punishment should be abolished2 Introduction Indeed, when the term death penalty is mentioned. Do people feel empty, misplaced, or perplexed at the same moment? Or is the vice versa? Surely, would people celebrate or rejoice? I do believe it is hard to tell anyone’s view on that issue. It is categorical that, and the second sentence will be felt by the oppressed. Demise, as it is commonly known, is an act of dying or being killed in other words, it is the end of an organism's life or a person's life(Bohm, 2016). Death and life is something of a kind.Honestly, it is worth mentioning that life is something precious and sacred, especially about human beings due to their intellectual capacity and the skills they pose that is not available among other living organisms. Identically before the eyes of the adage, we are his magnum opus; in other words, we are his apron string meaning we need to take care of each other. Though what is currently happening in the contemporary world? Destruction and violence have taken the better part of the universe(El Feki, 2016)s. It has translated to an increase of crime rates; wars to have taken, its position within the globe. Hence, making sense of humanity to depreciate before people's eyes slowly. Background of Capital punishment Consequently, to cease this menace the state and the governments in place have come up with numerous solutions, among the most preferred solution they have come up with is the death penalty which has attracted several debates across the world. The death penalty is defined as a condemnation for the death sentence and other capital offenses. Capital punishment can be prescribed as by state legislature as for murder and other capital offenses. According to the article published by amnesty international, around 101 countries have abolished the death
Capital Punishment should be abolished3 penalty as a punishment for all the batteries in law(Fleetwood, 2017). While on the other hand, 140 nations have abolished it in law and practice. It is evident that around fifty-eight countries still practice it as a law.Even though criminals have committed capital offenses in their lives, but that doesn't warrant capital punishment because they still have the right to live. Practicing capital punishment as a law in a country doesn't mean it will reduce crime rates that are occurring. Therefore, capital punishment should be wholly eradicated at all cost in the societal set up because it never leads to the decline of crime rates, subjects innocent people to risk their lives, and makes individuals to incur a lot of costs. Argument about innocence There are several arguments against the death penalty or capital offense. One of the most common debates is the execution of innocent, which is quite rampant in society. Capital punishment is indeed cogent as it is means sooner or later; most of the innocent people or individuals may be killed due to flaws in the criminal justice system(Greene, 2015). It means that most of the people who are part of the criminal justice system, namely; jurors, prosecutors, and witnesses can subject an individual whois innocent into risk. Admittedly, when this is coupled up with some numerous flaws within the justice system as sometimes a man is prone to errors. Undoubtedly, most innocent people may be convicted of some of the crimes they never did as it may become inevitable(Lambert, 2018).In such a scenario where the death penalty is put into practice, the truth may not be reconsidered because the accused may have already been murdered. As per the Amnesty international capital punishment legitimizes some acts which are considered an irreversible act of brutality by a nation or a country that will unavoidably claim the lives of innocent people. Since human justice needs to remain imperfect, the peril of executing above suspicion will remain a hard nut to crack. There is sufficient clarity that such mistakes are
Capital Punishment should be abolished4 prone in the current society we live in a case study in the USA since 1973 most of the victims of capital punishment around 130 of them are innocent meaning they had been wrongly accused. An argument about retribution Significantly, according to the Catholic conference held in U.S that they said, "we cannot teach that killing is wrong by killing" or as per the wordings of Desmond Tutu who has been quoted when he stated that "to take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, it is not justice." Therefore, it is perceived that retribution is an act which is morally inconsistent and problematic in practice and concept. The argument that holds water is that retribution is an act which is considered to be immoral due to the fact it legitimizes vengeance(Jervis, 2015). Notably, scenarios, where mobs attack prisons vehicles carrying victims of murder leaving the court premise or making some aggressive chants outside the courtroom as an offender is being prosecuted, illustrates vengeance is the most common solution to those victims who have committed capital offense before the eyes of the public. The argument on the right to live Notably, it is according to each person that life is valuable and precious. Most of the people who object capital punishment do believe that experience is indeed expensive. That even a person who is considered to be the worst on earth should not be deprived. Therefore, it prescribes that offenders are entitled to the right to live, which is paramount; thus, it makes them not to be denied by anyone under the sun(Zaibert, 2016). Subsequently,the therefore immoral act should not be punished by the death penalty even if the victim has killed a person. Most of the abolitionist can't stretch that far. They believe, or they deem life as something which should
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Capital Punishment should be abolished5 be preserved unless there is a legit reason not to. Thus those who are exposed to capital punishment are the ones who need to justify their state or position. The argument about the failure to deter The other compelling argument against capital punishment is the failure to prevent. According to this argument, they do believe; capital punishment cannot hinder people from committing heinous acts which need to be eradicated in the society(Muramatsu, 2018).The main issue which can restrain people from committing the crime or the actions of violence is the probability of being punished and caught. Categorically it is perceived by the social scientist. That, the hindrance effect of capital punishment is always unproven. A survey was conducted in 1988 by the UN to decide the relationship between homicide and death penalty. Then it was updated in 1996, concluding that: the research has indeed failed to provide some scientific corroboration have a broader deterrent impact than life imprisonment itself(Chalfin, 2017). Mostly it is considered not to be forthcoming. Thus, substantiation to back up, deterrent hypothesis. As per the research which was conducted. The most crucial reality and truth to deterrence is the ability to amplify the possibility of conviction, arrest, and detection. It points out that death punishment or capital punishment is inconsiderate, though it is not unkind to crime(McCafferty, 2016).Most scholars also believe that deterrence is a morally imperfect philosophy. People may even debate that a juror or an individual may also punish an innocent soul, and still, the effect remains the same. Admittedly, this argument is not valid due to the fact when individuals or a group of people are picked from streets and subjected to punishment as an available scapegoat is that the public will be afraid to react or go out. To make this argument to hold some waters, it is necessary for the accused to go through the right legal procedure or process.
Capital Punishment should be abolished6 Further, they need to provide sufficient evidence to the public that the accused person deserved the punishment he or she has been subjected. Even if some, societal setup, have always operated on their legal interpretation of the law of the land. That to extract confessions and fictional evidence, a person should be subjected to torture. Argument about brutality Honestly, brutality in society is subdivided into individuals, state, and lastly law. Brutalization in the community is believed to be the cause of high murder rates as per the statistics conducted by the FBI in the U.S(DeGue, 2016).Likewise, in the United States of America, most of those states which allow capital punishment to be practiced do experience high murder cases. Statistics also show that there was a decrease in the murder case in those states which had abolished it as a law. Hence, creating a gap between the countries which has abolished the death penalty, and those practicing it. Similarly, brutalization is also demonstrated in the state when individuals in society become a victim of capital punishment. George Kateb argued that if a nation can be having the ability to declare whether an individual is guilty. That illustrates it can do anything with peoples’ lives. Sensitively, the death penalty or capital punishment provides a link between violence and law. Though the law is unavoidably allied with hostility meaning its main objective is to punish the violent criminal acts, and it gives credit to the doctrine which inhibits human freedom(Quinlan, 2016). Ideologically law and violence are always intertwined or linked together. Moreover, in a sturdy case, battle criminal violence can be distinctively be differentiated from criminal violence, creating a sense of fairness and logic in society.
Capital Punishment should be abolished7 Innocent lives are at jeopardy. Since the restoration of capital punishment in the U.S in 1976, around 138 innocent people have been released from prison. It is also believed unearthing of these unjust cases was not due to the appeal procedure. But due to some modernize scientific methods, works of dedicated Barristers and Attorneys, and inquiries by journalists. The research was also conducted to determine those people executed from the states of Virginia, Texas, and Missouri was innocent(Obarisiagbon, 2017). As it is evident in the state laws, killing an honest person is punishable by law. Thus, it gives an argument, opposing the practices of the death penalty in society. Admittedly, figure out that the accused could have been killed later on it comes out crystal clear he or she was innocent there would be no means of salvaging.An innocent life would have already been consumed, exposing some of the family members into psychological torture upon getting the information. Sources and types of evidence In the attestation, vengeance is to deterrence. Hugo Adam, "The case against the death penalty" by American Civil Liberties Union" it is sighted that people who indulge in criminal acts may not or may premeditate their deeds. When a crime is deliberate, the immoral will pay attention to conviction and arrest. Even the most hostile punishment cannot daunt individuals who expect to evade capture and detection. Therefore it is impractical to figure out how the threat of any penalty can prevent a crime which has not been planned. Rebuttal to vengeance an attestation at the National Council of Synagogues and Bishops the excerpt "To end the death penalty." It points out that the death penalty is required in society as a way of retributive righteousness, to balance out felony with a punishment(Pettenger, 2016).Gives a reflection about a society's Informal concern, particularly those of the fatalities and their families. Punishing capital offense employing the death penalty demonstrates the seriousness of the crime to the whole community.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Capital Punishment should be abolished8 It is known that teaching individuals that any act of violence needs to be treated with the disorder of equal measure and magnitude. Is just a breeding ground for more force to be hatched. Conclusion All people under the sun have the right to live. Whether, you are a criminal, just an ordinary character or even a priest. Indeed, most of the criminals in society have been killed or exposed to torture severally. I subscribe to the words of Mahatma Gandhi that, "an eye for an eye will make the world blind." Meaning if someone beats you up, you too should beat him or her up. If this is followed to the later, it creates a perception that there is no need for implementing some legislation because we do things as per our own conscious. In the contemporary world, no one is perfect and free from mistakes and flaws. Therefore, the best vengeance to those characters that have hurt or inflicted pain to us is by accepting we all make mistakes and then forgive and forget. Indeed, if we leave to be stiff-necked, then we wouldn't go in peace and harmony. It is advisable not to hold grudges with people who have offended us but leave the Almighty to make the ultimate judgment. Capital punishment is then demonstrated not to be the amicable solution to some societal problems. Finally, the death penalty or capital punishment should be avoided entirely.
Capital Punishment should be abolished9 References Bohm, R. M., (2016).Deathquest: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States.Texas: Routledge. Chalfin, A. &. (2017). Criminaldeterrence: A review of the literature.Journal of Economic Literature, 45(12), 5-48. DeGue, S. F., (2016). Deaths are due to the use of lethal force by law enforcement: findings from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 17 US states.American journal of preventive medicine,34(5), S173-S187. El Feki, S. (2016). The Law is an Ass.World Policy Journal, 33(4), 8-9. Fleetwood, J. &. (2017). Women, drugs, and the death penalty: framing Sandiford.The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 53(6), 358-381. Greene, P. &. (2015). Against time bias. Ethics,23(6), 947-970. Jervis, L. A. (2015). Divine retribution in Romans.. Interpretation, 69(3), 323-337. Lambert, E. G., (2018). Gender and cultural differences on death penalty support and views among Indian and US college students.Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 16(4), 254-271. McCafferty, J. A., (2016).Capital punishment.Texas: Routledge. Muramatsu, K. J., (2018). The death penalty and homicide deterrence in Japan.Punishment & Society, 25(6), 432-457.
Capital Punishment should be abolished10 Obarisiagbon, B. E., (2017). Congregation of the Condemned: Decades of Discontinuous Debates on Death by Design in Southern Nigeria.Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,8(6), 91-98. Pettenger, M. E., (2016).The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses.Chicago: Routledge. Quinlan, M., (2016). "Such is Life": Euthanasia and capital punishment in Australia: consistency or contradiction?. Solidarity:The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics, 6(1), 3142-3212. Zaibert, L., (2016).Punishment and retribution.Chicago: Routledge.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Capital Punishment should be abolished11 Appendix Death penalty arguments Sources of evidence Types of evidenceContent Argument about innocence Journals by Lambert on. Ethnicity and criminal justice Quotes and wise sayings Research Case studies. Nongovernmental organization It illustrates that mistakes or flaws can exist. Criminal justice system. How it can be faulty. An argument about retribution Journals authored by Jervis book. Capital punishment books. Sociology books Sayings From Desmond Tutu Biblical journals Governments People should not be quick to revenge. It legitimizes vengeance. Life should not be taken. The argument on the right to live Books authored by Zabert about Surveys by UN in 1988. University web site. Life is valuable and everyone is entitled to it. Life is precious.
Capital Punishment should be abolished12 Retribution journal Punishmen t articles. Literature review GovernmentsIt is entitled to everyone. The argument about the failure to deter Journals authored by Muramatsu Punishmen t and society literature. Academic writings. Empirical study. Research by the USA FBI. Nongovernmental organization. Professional bodies Deterrence to capital punishment. It makes as incur expenses. Amplifies the possibility of conviction, and detection. Death punishment is inconsiderate Argument aboutJournals authored George Katebs byBrutality is subdivided into
Capital Punishment should be abolished13 brutalityby De Gue Reports Historical analysis argument. Report from WHO Professional bodies three categories. It should not be practiced Therefore, according to the modern world we live in death penalty is something that is considered to be against peoples’ lives. There are some many arguments that support the eradication of capital punishment in the society. Some of these arguments are; innocence, retribution, failure to deter, brutality and lastly the right to live. Above all it is believed and perceived that vengeance should be left to the almighty who is the giver and the taker of life.