Capital Structure Policy: Risk of Debt, Cost of Capital, Agency Theory, Pecking Order Theory
Verified
Added on  2023/06/04
|5
|1551
|323
AI Summary
This article discusses various aspects of capital structure policy including risk of debt, cost of capital, agency theory, and pecking order theory. It also includes computations and practical considerations related to capital structure.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE POLICY SECTION A 16.2 The above statements holds true as the risk of debt is generally lower to equity on account of securitisation against the assets of the company. Further, the debt holders has a higher tranche in repayment in case of liquidation of the company. In addition, the debt holders are ensured that they shall receive their interest irrespective of company making profit or loss. Thus, the return from such security is always lower than that of equity at max can be equal and can never exceed the same based on above deliberations. Further, the cost of debt is reduced by tax rate prevailing tax rate in the country. Hence, the stated proposition holds true. 16.4 The computation has been presented here-in-below: Sl NoParticularsAmountAmount 1Expected Cash flow200 2Cost of Equity20% 3value of the company today1000 4Buyback of shares100 5Cost of Debt10% 6Overall Cost of company20% 7Revised Cost of Equity30% 8Value of the company1000.00 9Value of debt100.00 10Value of Equity900.00 On perusal of the above, it shall be seen that value of the company stands at $ 1000. Further, the value of the claims on asset of the company after the share buyback stands at $900 (Assuming no current liability exists). The rate of return on ordinary shares post buyback shall be 30% on the basis of MM Proposition 1. 16.5 The computation has been presented here-in-below: Sl NoParticularsPercentageAmount Current Structure 1Cost of Capital- Equity100%15% Proposed Structure 1Debt50%10% 2Equity50% 3Cost of Capital100%15% Cost of Equity20%
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
On perusal of the above, it may be seen that the revised cost of equity shall stand at 15% on the basis of proposition laid down under MM 1. 16.7 The computation has been presented here-in-below: Sl NoParticularsPercentageAmount 1Weighted Average Cost of Capital100%10% 2Cost of debt80%8% 3Cost of Equity20%18% On perusal of the above, it may be seen that cost of equity of the company on the basis of assumption stands at 18%. 16.8 In terms of Static Trade-Off theory when the debt exceeds the optimal structure of the company, increase in debt does not reduce the WACC of the company on account of financial distress that occur on account of additional borrowing by the company. This causes cost of equity of the company to rise leading to rise in WACC post a certain point which is optimum capital structure.(Ebrary.net, 2018) 16.11 The computation has been presented here-in-below: Sl. NoParticularsPercentageAmount Current Structure 1Cost of Equity100%15% Proposed Structure 2Debt50%7% 3Cost of Capital100%15% 4Cost of Equity50%23% On perusal of the above, it may be seen that cost of equity stands at 23% based on computation that tax shield on debt has been considered. 16.12 The practical considerations have been detailed here-in-below: (a)Business Risk is the risk of operations of the company. The higher the risk of business the lower will be the debt optimal ratio; (b)Exposure of company to tax and the impact of such tax on the capital structure of the company. For instance, interest of debt is tax deductible. (c)Financial Flexibility: It is analysed to understand the capability of company to raise capital from the financial market under bad and good conditions; (d)Cash flows from the project: Before undertaking a project, management shall take into consideration the proposed cash flows from the project, the weighted average cost of
capital of the company, the net present value of the project, ranking of different projects, capital rationing etc; 16.28 The computation has been presented here-in-below: Sl NoParticularsInterestTax ShieldDiscounting FactorPresent Value 1Debt27.58.250.8695652177.173913043 2Debt27.58.250.7561436676.238185255 3Debt27.58.250.6575162325.424508918 4Debt27.58.250.5717532464.716964276 5Debt27.58.250.4971767354.101708066 6Present Value27.65527956 Assuming WACC of 15% On the basis of above, it may be understood that present value of tax savings of the company stands at 27.65 AUD. 16.29 Under the Modigliani Miller Approach, the valuation of the company is dependent on the value of tax savings on account of debt.If the value of debt is removed from the capital structure accordingly the value of company shall fall by 300*30% i.e. 90 Million and the value of the company post repayment of debt shall stand at 810 Million. SECTION B 16.7 In term of agency theory, the use of debt resources under the capital structure helps managers to be disciplined in regard to how they spend capital resources of the company as they have less free cash flow in their hand to use for their own benefit. Thus, in terms of agency theory, the higher the financial leverage the lower the agency cost. Thus the optimal structure is 90- 99% debt in terms of agency theory provided financial distress is maintained. 16.9 Financial distress is a situation in which the company cannot meet the expectations and face difficulty in paying off its creditors due to its high fixed cost and the assets which are generally illiquid in nature. Costs which company has to bear under financial distress such as heavy costs related to financing cost of next best alternative and low efficiency of employees. Distressed firm employees have very low productivity and high stress due to risk of bankruptcy of the company which could force them to join another organisation. 16.20
If the company have just begun the financial difficulty like creswell shoes, some of the ways the company should opt for a)The company should go for a restructuring process, by analysing the weakness of the company one will be able to reduce them and concentrate on strength of the business. b)The company should properly manage the cash flows, understand the total debt of the company, manage the inventory, and organise the total cash inflow of the company so that the outflow of cash can be met. c)The company should make a list of payment to be made to outside people according to urgency .Every organisation bear expenses which are not necessary but the moment the company is in financial problem those should be avoided. Another alternative is to find cheap raw material and go for a better negotiation.(Anon., 2018) In the situation of financial distress the company should not quit but it should take few steps to overcome it. 16.21 Yes, the managers of Ellison Group should chose the project as the Net Value of the project is positive and it shall provide resources to the company to pay off the liabilities. Further, the company can take a debt restructuring scheme to prevent itself from becoming insolvent and can use the fund to acquire other positive projects and hence the said project be accepted. The cost that the company shall bear on account of declining the project includes: (a)Cost of Debt; (b)Payroll cost; (c)Feasibility study cost of project; (d)Cost of insolvency; (e)Cost ancillary to project discussed. 16.24 The order of financial sources for managers who subscribe to pecking order theory has been detailed here-in-below: (a)Internal Funds: This means from profits generated within the company accumulated over the years. The cost of raising is Nil; (b)Debt: This means raising funds from the market by issue of a fixed rate of interest instrument and these instrument does not have any voting rights and no role in decision making of the company. The cost of raising money through bank is low and through secondary market is high; (c)Equity: This instruments are last resort and used when all other aforesaid measures are invaluable and generally results in dilution of ownership. The cost of raising funds through market is high.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
References: Anon., 2018.CAN YOUR COMPANY DEAL WITH FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES?.[Online] Available at:https://blog.apruve.com/how-can-your-company-deal-with-financial-problems-and- difficulties [Accessed 30 September 2018]. Ebrary.net, 2018.The Trade-off theory of capital structure.[Online] Available at:https://ebrary.net/735/business_finance/trade-off_theory_capital_structure [Accessed 30 September 2018].