Case Study 23: Supporting Julian Cope with Parental Separation
Verified
Added on 2023/03/31
|5
|976
|169
AI Summary
This case study explores the challenges faced by a kindergarten teacher in supporting a student, Julian Cope, who is exhibiting antisocial behavior due to parental separation. The teacher uses anecdotal observation and collaborates with the parent to develop a targeted plan for behavioral change.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CASE STUDY1 Case Study 23: Supporting Julian Cope with Parental Separation Names Institution Affiliation
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CASE STUDY2 Case Study 23: Supporting Julian Cope with Parental Separation Teacher Mingmei Wong is a kindergarten teacher dealing with children aged between five and six years. She believes that getting close to the student would allow her to support their social and educational development and reduce their misbehaviors. In the course of her interactions with the learners, she realized “that Julian has been mostly playing by himself since the beginning of the year, interacting only when necessary with other children playing with the unit blocks in the block's corner and interacting very little with her” (Ozretich, 2010, p. 86). Teacher Mingmei informs her assistant, Rhiannon, of the need to keep a close eye on Julian using anecdotal observation. According to Brown (2012), written reports accompanying anecdotal observations highlight unusual or unique behavioral incidents of the individual student. Preparation of anecdotal notes takes place during learning, and the information contained in the reports relates to strange individual-student incidences that occur during a specified learning span. Teacher Mingmei’s use of anecdotal observation shows that she is concerned with Julian's behavior, and she wants to help him. To effectively support Julian, the teacher needed to record his behavioral tendencies over some time to establish whether there was a pattern or it was a single episode. A pattern would indicate a problem and call for a serious search for a solution. However, single unrelated incidences would merely call for closer observation and support. Julian exhibited a pattern of antisocial behavior such as playing alone and hitting his peers who took his playthings, which called for a search for a solution. The teacher first dealt with behavioral incidences as they arose. For Instance, in a situation where he took a block and hit another learner who had taken away some blocks that he was using, the teacher intervened immediately. Her first course of action was to stop the incident, and getting him to apologize to
CASE STUDY3 the offended student. She then sat down with Julian and talked empathetically with him to prevent such violent incidents in the future. According to Larzelere & Kuhn (2005), talking to and trying to reason with a child is more effective in preventing aggression than physical punishment and "time-outs." However, the teacher was aware that the antisocial behavior patterns indicated a more profound problem, and she decided to contact the parent to find more information about the child. The collaboration between teachers and parents is one of the most effective ways of establishing a conducive environment for learning. According to education researchers, proper communication and cooperation between teachers and parents allow both parties to exchange relevant information about the needs of the child (Lee & Low, 2013). The information enables them to play their roles more effectively for the child’s benefit. Moreover, some student’s behaviors in school can only be understood with background information provided by the parent. By contacting Julian’s parent, teacher Mingmei made the first step in establishing a parent- teacher collaborative environment. In the process, she received helpful information about the student, which explained the root of his problems. Armed with the knowledge, the teacher was able to tailor her approach to target the issues underlying Julian's antisocial behavior specifically. The information that Julian’s parent, Mrs. Parker, provided about her situation at home changed teacher Mengmei’s perception of his behavior. At some point, the teacher had viewed him as “a boy who didn’t seem to know how to engage with other children in their play, or perhaps he just didn’t want to” (Ozretich, 2010, p. 88). However, on speaking with the boy's mother, she realized that his behavior was influenced by the issues surrounding the separation of his parents. According to psychologists, aggressiveness in children can result from environmental factors such as divorce or separation of parents (Shannon & Aletha, 2006). On
CASE STUDY4 learning the causes of Julian’s antisocial behavior, Teacher Mengmei was able to develop a targeted plan to support Julian’s behavioral change, and help him adapt to kindergarten. Teacher Mengmei decided to make a deliberate effort to include Julian during play with other children or to invite a child or two to play with him during the self-select games. The show of concern and inclusion are essential means of encouraging children to view others as friends rather than enemies. Also, it reduces the child's aggressiveness to the others (Chugh, Kern, Zhu, & Lee, 2014). Moreover, Julian’s parent’s separation issue opened the teacher’s eye to her previous assumptions that all the children in her class had families consisting of both parents. The experience made her change her social studies’ theme project to include families with single parents as functional families. Also, she was able to successfully use the concept web to allow Julian to gradually heal from the trauma of separation and feelings of loss and anger.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
CASE STUDY5 References Brown B. G. (2012). Identifying creative potential in handicapped children.Journal of exceptional children48 (2), 115-122. Chugh D, Kern MC, Zhu Z and Lee S. 2014. Withstanding moral disengagement: Attachment security as an ethical intervention.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology51(1), 88– 93. Larzelere, R. E. & Kuhn, B. R. (2005). Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: a meta-analysis.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev.8(1), 1-37. Lee, L. W., & Low, H. M. (2013). ‘Unconscious’ inclusion of students with learning disabilities in a Malaysian mainstream primary school: Teachers’ perspectives.Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(3), 218-228. Ozretich, R., Burt, L., Doescher, S., & Foster, M. (2010).Case studies in early childhood education: Implementing developmentally appropriate practices. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. ISBN: 9780135026038. Shannon, E. C. & Aletha, C. H. (2006). “Family Instability and Children’s Early Problem Behavior,”Social Forces85(1), 551-581.