Case Study Analysis

Running Head: CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Case study analysis
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author’s Note

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS1
Table of Contents
1.1. The changes within the OZ industries, and determine the reasons for such changes?.............1
2.1. Describe the issues which contributed to Carmelita’s position being made redundant. What
are the possible repercussions for the organisation?........................................................................1
3.1. What ethical HR issues may take place to challenge the proposed changes?..........................2
4.1. How will the changes impact upon the current employees?.....................................................2
5.1. Based upon the topic we have studied, explanation in regard to how the restructure could
have been better managed?..............................................................................................................3
- What additional initiatives could be proposed in order to avoid resignations and
redundancies?........................................................................................................................3
- How would this benefit the organisation?.............................................................................3
References........................................................................................................................................4

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS2
1.1. The changes within the OZ industries, and determine the reasons for such changes?
The observed changes are a couple of problems that is being faced by the concerning
firm. On the other hand, there is a much of conflict regarding that of financial matter. The
number of professional experts who have been serving the firm for a longer period of time fails
to stays within the firm, one after the another they are resigning this has created a serious for the
concerning firm Oz.
On the other contrary there has a change within the workplace that has been introduced
by that of the new Meg Obrien, Carmelita she was called into the offic, and a communication
session took place where it was clearly said that her position is secured (Carmelita Conti).
However, there is a need to introduce some changes for which now she does not have to look
after the payroll. She was being promoted to a new position for which now she will be reporting
administratively to the Peter-Gomez and functionally to Meg (Pakdil et al., 2014).
2.1. Describe the issues which contributed to Carmelita’s position being made redundant.
What are the possible repercussions for the organisation?
The issue of position change made Carmelita Conti annoyed such that she got frustrated
over the discussion. As she was acting in that position and in that manner for a longer period, it
was not desirable for her to undertake and accept the changes. She took it as an insult, and her
ego got hurt because of her thoughts and visions. She was not comfortable to operate further. She
was besides not having any professional with whom she can communicate her issue
(Suriyankietkaew et al., 2014).