Business Law Problems with Solutions 2022

Running head- BUSINESS LAW
Business Law
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
1.

Business Law1
Problem 1:
The Sales of Goods is applicable in the following scenario the answer to the given
issues are as follows:
i. The following issue is regarding the payment for the damaged caused to the Goods.
Under section 21 of the Sales of Goods Act, it is stated that the risk of the good passes
to the buyer as the goods are transferred. This provision states that any good is under
the risk of the seller unless it is delivered to the buyer, but once the right is transferred
to the buyer, the goods are considered to be at the risk of the buyer whether delivered
or not. Applying the rule, Jack shall be liable to pay for the damages as the rights
were already transferred to Jack.
ii. According to section 33(1) of the Act, the buyer possesses the right to examine the
goods before buying. In the case where the buyer has not examined the goods or item
earlier that they may not accept the contract unless they get another opportunity to
examine. In the following scenario Jack has not examined the car earlier so under this
provision he shall be deemed not to accept the contract unless he gets another chance
to examine
iii. The rules that shall be applicable in the following scenario are section 18 and section
29. Section 18 states that the risk of the property or the goods passes on to the buyer
with the property and section 29 states the delivery of a wrong item to the buyer due
to wrong quantity or quality. Under the section 29(3) it specifies that in cases when
the goods that are sold to the buyer are not according to the contract, then the buyer
has the right to reject the goods as a whole. In the following scenario, Jack can claim
the damages and reject the car under section 29(3) of the act as Mary stated that the
car was in good condition and can go for long drives easily. However, the seizure of

Business Law2
the engine proves that the car was not at all in good condition. Whereas, Mary can
take the defence under Section 18 by stating that the risk of the goods passes to the
buyer along with the property whether delivered or not.
iv. Under the Mortgages act when a borrower has defaulted in paying the debts of a
mortgage payment, then the first remedy that he is possessing is selling the property
in order to make the payment where the person is a registered mortgagee. Under this
provision, the property can be only taken upon serving the proper notice. So, in this
case, Jack did not receive any notice regarding the payment. In that case, he shall get
time in order to repay the debt to the bank.
Problem 2:
Issues
The main issues that are observed in the scenario are as follows:
 Will Caroline receive any damages from the company due to unfair dismissal and
humiliation that she faced in the workplace?
 Was the dismissal of Caroline by the Company was on fairgrounds?
Rule
 Under the Division XIV, Part III of the Canadian Labor Code it states that any
employees who have finished 12 months in a continuance way with a company they
can register a complaint against the company for unjust dismissal of work within 90
days from the dismissal.
Analysis
Caroline: In the following suit, she is the plaintiff and the employee of the company. The
company fired her upon an unjustified reason. Under the provisions of the employment and