ProductsLogo
LogoStudy Documents
LogoAI Grader
LogoAI Answer
LogoAI Code Checker
LogoPlagiarism Checker
LogoAI Paraphraser
LogoAI Quiz
LogoAI Detector
PricingBlogAbout Us
logo

CQU Language Promotion Project Proposal

Verified

Added on  2020/04/07

|10
|982
|53
AI Summary
This assignment presents a detailed project proposal focused on promoting languages within the campus of Central Queensland University (CQU). It outlines specific activities such as selecting vendors, designing signage, and installing promotional materials. The proposal also includes a comprehensive breakdown of funding requirements, categorized by tasks like vendor selection, interface display design, and sign board installation. A cumulative total of project costs is provided throughout the document.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Running head: CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
Case Study- Our language is important
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author’s Note

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
1
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
Table of Contents
1. Risk Register................................................................................................................................3
2. Cost Baseline...............................................................................................................................5
2.1 Funding requirements............................................................................................................6
Bibliography....................................................................................................................................7
Document Page
2
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
1. Risk Register
PROJECT RISK & OPPORTUNITY REGISTER
Risk / Opportunity
Identification Risk & Opportunity Analysis
Post Treatment
Risk & Opportunity
Analysis
N
u
m
b
e
r
D
a
t
e
L
o
g
g
e
d
R
a
i
s
e
d
B
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
Ty
pe
Desc
riptio
n
(Cau
se/E
vent/
Effec
t)
P
r
o
xi
m
it
y
Categ
ory
Li
k
el
ih
o
o
d
Co
ns
eq
ue
nc
e
L
e
v
el
(p
re
tr
e
at
m
e
nt
)
T
re
at
m
e
nt
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
Tr
ea
tm
en
t
Tr
ea
t
m
e
nt
U
p
d
at
e
O
w
n
e
r
Resi
dual
Impa
ct
Li
k
el
ih
o
o
d
(p
o
st
tr
e
at
m
e
nt
)
Co
ns
eq
ue
nc
e
(p
ost
tre
at
me
nt)
L
e
v
el
(p
o
st
tr
e
at
m
e
nt
)
1 1
0
.
0
9
.
1
7
N
a
t
a
li
e
M
a
rt
i
n
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
hr
ea
t
It is
ident
ified
that
there
are
more
than
250
indig
enou
s
lang
uage
s that
are
on
beco
ming
extin
ct
due
to
colo
nizat
ion
the
peop
le
are
not
allo
wed
to
spea
k in
those
lang
uage
s.
Addi
tiona
lly it
is
foun
d
that
the
elder
s
who
have
9
.
9
.
1
7
People A
l
m
o
st
c
er
ta
in
3.
Mo
der
ate
H
ig
h
R
e
d
u
c
e
T
he
tra
dit
io
na
l
la
ng
ua
ge
s
m
us
t
be
pr
o
m
ot
ed
wi
thi
n
th
e
ca
m
pu
s
of
C
Q
U
so
th
at
th
e
pe
op
le
in
cl
ud
in
g
th
e
st
ud
en
4.
0
3.
2
0
1
8
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
The
indig
enou
slang
uage
get
extin
ct
and
as a
resul
t the
com
muni
ty of
peop
le
face
the
impa
ct
P
o
ss
ib
le
M
ajo
r
M
e
di
u
m
Document Page
3
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
prop
er
amo
unt
of
infor
mati
on
abou
t the
in
indig
enou
s
lang
uage
s do
not
have
prop
er
resou
rce
for
captu
ring
them
.
t
ca
n
ge
t
to
kn
o
w
ab
ou
t
th
e
si
gn
ifi
ca
nc
e
of
di
ff
er
en
t i
in
di
ge
no
us
la
ng
ua
ge
s
th
at
ar
e
on
th
e
lin
e
of
ex
tin
cti
on
2 1
5
.
0
9
.
7
F
r
e
d
ri
c
k
h
a
y
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
hr
ea
t
It is
ident
ified
that
the
num
ber
of
Engli
sh
spea
kers
rises
as
the
peop
le
who
gene
rally
spea
k
Engli
sh
stim
ulate
other
s for
1
4
.
9
.
1
7
Perfor
mance
/Servi
ce
Delive
ry
L
ik
el
y
3.
Mo
der
ate
H
ig
h
R
e
d
u
c
e
T
he
st
at
e
go
ve
rn
m
en
t
of
th
e
co
un
tr
y
m
ak
e
ta
ke
pr
op
er
ac
tio
1
4.
0
3.
2
0
1
5
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
It
gene
rally
creat
e
effec
tive
impa
ct on
the
proje
ct
man
ager
as
well
as on
other
stake
hold
ers
of
the
proje
ct
L
ik
el
y
3.
M
od
era
te
L
o
w

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
4
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
not
spea
king
tradit
ional
lang
uage
s and
as a
resul
t the
lang
uage
s are
goin
g to
extin
ct.
Addi
tiona
lly
the
gove
rnme
nt of
the
coun
try is
not
inter
ested
in
takin
g
any
step
that
woul
d be
bene
ficial
in
the
prom
otion
of
diffe
rent
types
of
indig
enou
s
lang
uage
s.
ns
as
w
ell
as
ad
op
t
ap
pr
op
ria
te
str
at
eg
ie
s
th
at
ar
e
he
lp
s
in
pr
o
m
oti
ng
th
e
tra
dit
io
na
l
la
ng
ua
ge
s
w
hi
ch
ar
e
ex
tin
cti
on
da
y
by
da
y.
Pr
o
m
oti
on
of
th
e
la
ng
ua
ge
by
th
e
go
ve
rn
m
en
t
Document Page
5
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
w
ou
ld
be
co
ns
id
er
ed
as
on
e
of
th
e
si
gn
ifi
ca
nt
st
ep
in
la
ng
ua
ge
pr
o
m
oti
on
3 2
0
.
9
.
1
7
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
W
il
li
a
m
s
A
c
t
i
v
e
O
pp
or
tu
nit
y
It is
foun
d
that
the
proje
ct
will
not
get
com
plete
withi
n the
speci
fied
date
or
sche
dule
d as
the
proje
ct
mana
ger
want
s to
incor
porat
e
some
more
funct
ional
ities
whic
h are
foun
d to
be
quite
bene
ficial
in
prom
1
8
.
9
.
1
7
Stakeh
older/
Comm
unity
P
o
ss
ib
le
1.I
nsi
gni
fic
ant
L
o
w
A
c
c
e
pt
T
he
pr
oj
ec
t
rel
at
ed
pl
an
ni
ng
m
us
t
be
do
ne
pr
op
erl
y
by
ta
ki
ng
th
e
he
lp
of
th
e
pr
oj
ec
t
m
an
ag
er.
If
pr
op
er
Fi
ni
sh
ed
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Do
not
creat
e any
type
of
impa
ct
U
nl
ik
el
y
Si
gni
fic
ant
L
o
w
Document Page
6
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
oting
the
lang
uage.
pl
an
ni
ng
is
do
ne
th
en
th
e
pr
oj
ec
t
m
an
ag
er
do
es
no
t
fa
ce
th
e
ch
all
en
ge
s
th
at
ar
e
as
so
ci
at
ed
wi
th
ex
te
ns
io
n
of
f
sc
he
du
le

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
7
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
2. Cost Baseline
WBS Task Name Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 Project kick off $30,000
1.1 Development of charter
document $11,000.00
1.2 Development of
initiation documents $ 300.00
1.3 Document submission $ 900.00
2 Requirement gate $20,000
2.1 Formation of project
outlining $ 800.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00
2.2 Operation analysis $ 2,300.00
2.3 Review of project
outline $ 400.00 $ 200.00 $ 1,200.00 $37,000
2.4 Design gate $ 1,200.00
3.1 Local language selection $ 2,200.00
3.2 Translation of message
selection $ 3,400.00 $ 5,000.00
3.2 Translation of message
selection $ 3,400.00 $ 5,000.00
3.3 Development gate $ 23,000.00
3.4 Signage board
development $ 39,000.00
3.5
Putting signage board
properly in the
university
$ 5,000.00 $ 18,000.00
4 Implementation gate $50,000
4.1 Review of the signage $ 11,000.00 $ 10,000.00
4.2 Location of different
signage review $ 10,000.00
5 Closure gate $50,000
5.1 Final documentation $ 6,000.00 $ 1,700.00
5.2 Document signing $ 1,200.00
5.3 Project closure phase $ 3,100.00
Total $ 11,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 200.00 $ 26,800.00 $ 50,800.00 $ 80,700.00 $11,000.00 ######### $108,100 $ 10,000.00 $ 37,000.00
Cumulative total 11500 16500 18900 19100 45900 96700 177400 188400 202700 310800 320800 357800
Document Page
8
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
2.1 Funding requirements
The funding requirements of the project are mainly elaborated below:
Activities Funding required
Selection of appropriate vendor for
the project
$17,000
Interface display $18,000
Design of the sign board into the
campus of CQU for promoting
language
$15,000
Procedure of sign board
installation
$10,000
Procedure related with printing of
sign board
$18,000
Sign board collection $17,100
Total $95,100
Document Page
9
CASE STUDY: OUR LANGUAGE IS IMPORTANT
Bibliography
Abdel Azeem, S., Hosny, H., & Ibrahim, A. (2014). Forecasting project schedule
performance using probabilistic and deterministic models. HBRC Journal, 10(1), 35-
42.
Andersen, E. (2014). Value creation using the mission breakdown structure. International
Journal Of Project Management, 32(5), 885-892.
Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA.
Dalcher, D. (2015). Introduction to Software Project Management. Proj Mgmt Jrnl, 46(4), e2-
e2.
Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project
success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189-201.
Eric Kirkland, C. (2014). Project Management: A Problem-Based Approach. Project
Management Journal, 45(1), e3-e3.
Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling,
and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
1 out of 10
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]