This case study examines the tax implications for sports businesses in Australia, analyzing key statutory requirements, case studies, and how organizations adapt to relevant legislation for efficient operations. It covers topics like income tax regulations, capital expenditure, and special professional income averaging.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Case study
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
INTRODUCTION Knowledge of various taxes imposed by tax authorities or government and key statutory requirements, is necessary to avoid complexity in operating and managing different activities or functions of organisation. This report describes key statutory requirements applicable to a range of sports businesses, enterprises and associations, application of taxation legislation to various casestudiesinvolvingsportsbusinessenterprisesornotforprofitentitiesalongwith interpretation. This report also provides explanation about manner in which both profit seeking and not for profit sports entities adapt to relevant legislative requirements to work in the most efficient manner (Asafu-Adjaye and Mahadevan, 2013). TASK 1 Members in club = 5000 members For the year ended 30 June 2018, reported profit = $220,000 TotalIncome from non-membersIncome from members Green Fees$80,000$80000 * 40% = $32000$48000 RestaurantandBar Operations $40,000$40000 * 50% = $20000$20000 Gaming Activities$100,000$100000 * 75% = $75000$25000 Total Turnover$220000$127000$93000 While analysing different tax criteria as per income tax regulation turnover includes both Income from non-members and Income from members in case of clubs and not for profit companies. According to regulations issued by Australian tax authority organisation is small business entity if: Company is operating business for all or part of the year. Having a total amount of turnover below $10 million. As given in case study The Maxwell Golf Club is sports club. Along with sports club it also has a restaurant complex trough which it provides restaurant and bar services. Also Maxwell Golf Club has reported aggregate turnover of $220000. So companies belong to category of not for profit companies that are small business entities (Chomik and Piggott, 2012). So following is the tax slab for companies belongs to not for profit companies that are small business entities: 1
Case : For Not-for-profit companies that are small business entitiesCase : Other not-for-profit companies If Taxable income is : Tax Rates would be: If Taxable income is :Tax Rates would be: 0 – $ 416Nil0 – $ 416Nil $ 417 – $ 832 55% for every dollar over $416$ 417 – $ 915 55% for every dollar over $416 $ 833 and above 27.5% for every dollar $ 916 and above30% for every dollar Note: In case taxable income equals to $ 833 or more then whole amount would be taxable. Note: In case taxable income equal to $ 916 ormorethenwholeamountwouldbe taxable. Therefore taxable amount for The Maxwell Golf Club would be: $ 220,000 * 27.5% = $ 60500 TASK 2 According to rulings of income tax regularity of Australia, Expenses of capital nature are not deductible. Generally legal expenses are of capital natures, following legal expenses are not deductible, as follows: 1.Legal expenses related to acquisition or selling of property 2.Legal expenses for Resisting land resumption 3.Legal expense incurred to defend title property. Here in given case Sydney Sports Ltd incurred legal expenses of $500,000 in October 2018 in protecting its exclusive rights agreement with the Sydney Rugby Union to televise all major club rugby fixtures in Sydney (Fletcher and Guttmann, 2013). The agreement is the sole asset of Sydney Sports Ltd which indicates that such legal expenses are of capital nature therefore no deduction is available for legal expenses of $500,000. 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
TASK 3 When a individual uses physical skills in performing any activity then will be termed as special professional. When a person fall in the group of special professional then eligibility for special professional income averaging is applicable. This is a concessional tax treatment which leads to application of tax at a rate lower then amount paid in general sense. Taxable professional income is the amount remaining after taking away from the professional income the total of the deductions that is reasonably related with the professional income. The deductions such as gifts to charity will be taken into account for calculating the taxable professional income (Veall, 2012). The assessable professional income will include- rewards and prices income from endorsements, advertisements, interviews, commentating and any similar services. Royalty from copyright of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work. Income from a patent for an invention. In the given case Jamiles Elias a Rugby player is offered a three year contract in which an amount of $2000 per game w3ill be paid. Together with this $10000 bonus will be paid if the team makes the top at the end of the season and a lump sum of $150000 will be paid for entering into the contract. As the person is special professional and tax will be charged at special rate. The amount of payment received per match and bonus both will be termed as professional income of the game. When amount of $150000 is received for playing only rugby and giving up on cricket then it will not be termed as professional income and considered as other income. Rate of tax charged on the professional income will be concessional but other income will be taxed at the normal rate. TASK 4 In the given situation on 1stJuly 2017, Max fit Gym acquired an abandoned warehouse in order to convert into Gym. After this $750000 has been spent by the company on upgrading the building to reasonable working condition. An asset that have a longer life are termed as capital assets. Such as building, motor vehicles, furniture, machinery and equipment. A capital asset is either the cost of an asset that has longer life(more then one year). An expense associated with establishing, replacing, enlarging or improving the structure of business (Capital assets and expenses,2018). Capital expenditure is done in an small amount then it can be claimed as 3
expense in the same year. When amount of capital expenditure is huge then expense can be claimed for an amount in decline value of the asset each year over the number of years. Amount that is spend to make repair in building to bring it in working condition. Some capital expenditure can not be claimed such as substantial improvement to an item or property. Repairs made to machinery, tools or property immediately after purchase or acquire them then also capital expenditure can not be claimed. In the given case Max organisation also acquired an abandoned warehouse and after that make expenditure to bring it in working condition. This expenditure of the company can not be claimed as capital expenditure because price paid for the repairs reflects the items condition. Amount that is spend on building will be included in the cost of acquisition of warehouse and can not be deducted for the company in the tax year 2017 and 2018 (Worthington, 2012). CONCLUSION From this report it has been articulated that for organisation whether their motive is to earn profit or not, adaption of key statutory requirements is essential to operate its functions in smoothly manner. Some changes in tax legislation have major effects on organisation workings so organisation should keep updated with current changes in tax legislation in order to prepare themselves for such changes. Their is difference in the applicability of taxation policy of an individual that is based on their profession and various taxation benefits in form of deductions are provided to businesses and individuals to support them. 4
REFERENCES Books and Journals Asafu-Adjaye, J. and Mahadevan, R., 2013. Implications of CO2 reduction policies for a high carbon emitting economy.Energy economics.38.pp.32-41. Chomik, R. and Piggott, J., 2012. Pensions, Ageing and Retirement in Australia: Long‐Term Projections and Policies.Australian Economic Review.45(3). pp.350-361. Fletcher, M. and Guttmann, B., 2013. Income inequality in Australia.Economic Round-up.(2). p.35. Veall, M. R., 2012. Top income shares in Canada: recent trends and policy implications. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.45(4). pp.1247-1272. Worthington, A. C., 2012. The quarter century record on housing affordability, affordability drivers, and government policy responses in Australia.International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis.5(3). pp.235-252. Online Capitalassetsandexpenses.2018.[Online].Availablethrough: <https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Income-and-deductions-for-business/Deductions/ Capital-assets-and-expenses/> 5