This article discusses the implementation of change in the management process using Kotter's model and VAL IT framework. It explores the challenges faced by organizations and the steps involved in the change process. The focus is on the implementation of ICT in the organization and the need for proper governance and monitoring.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................2 Discussion..................................................................................................................................2 Description of the situation:...................................................................................................2 Overview of VALIT:..............................................................................................................3 Possible challenges for VAGO using the framework:...........................................................4 Overview of Kotter’s model:.................................................................................................5 Application of Kotter’s model to implement the Val IT:.......................................................7 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................8 References..................................................................................................................................9
2 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS Introduction The maintenance and the governance of the project will help the project to deliver the right outcome. It has been seen that due to the lack of proper governance the implementation of the ICT in the organization cannot be implemented in a proper way. It has been seen that the Victorian General’s office has notices that the implementation of the ICT has not been implementedina properway (Hornstein2015).Theprojectplansinitiatedbythis organization have the lack of realistic plans. It has been seen that the implementation of the project has been done on the tax payer’s money. In this case, it is needed to be concerned by the organization that the money is not wasted on the wrong implementation of the projects. In order to mitigate the problem, the VAGO has implemented change management process so that the implementation of the project governance can be done in a proper way. Apart from that the other aspects of the business can be described through the selected model and different project governance standard (Leischniget al.2018). In this context, the use of the Kotter’s change model for implementation of VALIT has been discussed. The conclusion is drawn from the factors discussed in the discussion. Discussion Description of the situation: VAGO is trying to maintain the proper use of the ICT for the daily functionalities of the government organization. It has been seen that the most of the cases in VAGO are unrealistic in nature. There are 1249 projects and 1/3rdof these projects are realistic. It has been seen that the companies those are responsible for the implementation of the ICT for the government organizations in Australia have failed to meet all the necessary requirements in the organization. In this context, it has been seen that the monitoring of the ICT projects through the newly implemented dashboard will be helpful for the reporting. In order to
3 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS implement the system properly, there is a need for the change in the management process. VAGO has initiated the plan that can be helpful for the change in the management process. Overview of VALIT: VAL IT is the framework that will help the organization to implement the realistic and optimized IT value investment for the enterprise.VAGO can implement the new changed process through the use VAL IT. It has been seen that through the implementation of the VAL IT the value implementation of the ICT can be done in a proper way. It has been seen that the collective experience can be gained from the implementation of the existing and emerging practices that can be implemented through the use of VAL IT.This governance framework is consists of a set of guidelines, principals and the processes. The processes of the VAL IT will cover the following business management process. These are- ï‚·Management of the portfolio. ï‚·Value governance ï‚·Investment management. The principals of the Val IT framework is developed by the ISACA. There are seven principals of the VAL IT are- ï‚·Portfolio management will defined the IT enabled investments. ï‚·The IT investment will be done in such a way that it will cooperate with the required value of the business. ï‚·It has enabled investment that can be managed through the economic life cycle. ï‚·Practice regarding the delivery of the value can be done and managed through the different categories of the investment. ï‚·Apart from that the VAL IT will monitor the key metrics those are responsible for the quick response and the implementation of the change in the organization.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS Delivery of the value will engage all the stakeholders involved in the project (Lřnvik, Pettersen and Verhulst 2016). Apart from that the assigning of the appropriate work to the project team members can be done through the system. This will help to increase the accountability of the overall system. The delivery of the value will be monitored and evaluated in a proper way. It has been seen that the project management organizations are not meeting all the requirements mentioned by the VAGO. In this context, there is a need for the redevelopment of the overall project. Main objective of VAL IT is to make the connection between the technical and the business unit of the organization (Omidi and Khoshtinat 2016). This synchronization will help to take the better business decision in the organization. One of the process for the adaptation of the business value in the organization is to implement the change in the management process. VAGO has seen that there is a lack of quality in the reporting of the ICT implementation in the organization (vom Brocke, Zelt and Schmiedel 2016). However, it is assumed that the use of the new portal will be helpful for the organization for the implementation of the proper monitoring system (Nordin and Deros 2017). For implementation of the new portal system, VAGO is going to develop change in the management process so that the new system can be delivered properly. Possible challenges for VAGO using the framework: Therearecertainchallengesthosecanbehelpfulfortheimplementationofthe framework by VAGO. The possible challenges those can be faced during the implementation and development of the VAL IT framework are- Problems in delivering the technical capabilities: It has been seen that sometimes the infrastructure in the IT environment is not matured enough to deliver the required
5 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS value for the further development of the project. In this case, the improvement of the IT value governance is needed to be maintained so that the changes can conjugate with the required changes. No clear understanding of the IT expenditure:It has been seen that some of the managers in the organization are not aware about the expenditure required for the implementation of the ICT in the organization (Abbasnejad, Nepal and Drogemuller 2016). In that case, there can be a problem for the governance and the implementation of the problems in the organization. Decision making regarding IT implementation and IT function: It has been seen that the management of the organization may face problem regarding the decisions making for the implementation of the IT functions in the organization (de Almeidaet al.2017). In this case, there is a possibility that the implementation of the ICT in the organization may not be relevant to the requirements of the organization. Failure of the major investments: There is a possibility regarding the major failure in the investment of the project (Carnall 2018). In case, if the requirements of the ICT is not clear there is a possibility that the implementation of the project may not be implemented in a proper way. Communication between IT and the business unit: Another challenge that VAGO faced during the implementation of the VAL IT is the communication gap between the business unit and technical unit. There can be problem regarding the business synchronization between business and the technical organization. Overview of Kotter’s model: Kotter’s model is the model or the framework used for the managing the changes in the business organization. It has been seen that there are 8 step change model needed to be included for processing the proper changes in the organization. It has been seen that VAGO is
6 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS going to implement the technology regarding the new reporting system (Muzanenhamoet al. 2016). In order to do this in a proper way, VAGO is to implement the Kotter’s 8 step model in a proper way. The 8 steps in the Kotter;s model are- Creation of the proper environment for change: It has been seen that VAGO has the necessity for changing the ICT process in the organization as the generation of the report is not don in a proper way. This situation triggers the development of the environment for the change. Building the team: The implementation of the project in business environment, there is a need for building the project development team. Project development team will take the responsibility for the development of proposed change in the organization. Gaining the right vision: The right vision is needed for the project manager in order to implement the right ICT system in the organization (Hammer 2015). In case of VAGO it has been seen that the management has identified right area for the change and has approached the right steps for implementation of changed system. Engaging the organization: During the implementation of the project the indulgent of the organization for the implementation of the system (Pan, Pan and Lim 2015). In this case, the level of the involvement of organization in changed process will denote the level of success for the implementation of the change. Removing the constraints: After the determination of the level of engagement, the removing of the constraints for the change present in the organization is needed to be done in a proper way. It has been seen that the employees in the organization are the main constraint regarding the change as there are lots of uncertainties involved in the changed process (Asnan, Nordin and Othman 2015). However, it is the responsibility of the management to make the employees understand about the positive attributes of the changes in the process.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS Maintaining the short term goals: After removing the barriers, the determination of the short term objectives are needed to be implemented (Holten and Brenner 2015). The successful implementation of the shirt term goals will help the employees in the organization to get motivated to achieve more success in change of the management process. Sustaining progress: The change of the process is needed to be evaluated in a proper way. For the evaluation of the change in the process sometimes the progress regarding the change is needed to be sustained so that the effectiveness of the already implemented system can be determined (Georgaliset al.2015). After the analysis of the progress, the resuming of the change process can be done. Implement the change: After the following of all the above mentioned stages, the change can be implemented in a proper way. After the implementation of the change the maintaining of the change is needed to be done. Application of Kotter’s model to implement the Val IT: The main aim of VAGO is to implement the change in the ICT management process in organization. In order to do this the framework named VAL IT is proposed to be implemented.Inordertoimplementframeworkinproperway,theproperchange management process is needed to be followed. In this context, VAGO is going to implement the change through Kottel’s 8 step model. At the first stage the reason for the change and the requirement for the change are needed to be understood. It has been seen that the reporting system regarding the ICT implementation and the monitoring process are not carried out in a proper way. In this situation the change is necessary. In the changed environment,the requirementis to implement the new reporting and monitoring system.
8 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS For development of the change in VAGO has to makeemployees understand about the need for the new system. Apart from that the management has to make it sure that the employees are not feeling a lack in the job security (Stark 2015). Apart from that proper training is needed to be given to them so that they can handle the new system in a proper way. The responsibility for the implementation of the system is needed to be given to the right organization. Apart from that proper project management team are needed to be indulged in the process of the implementation. After the change is achieved it is the responsibility of VAGO to maintain that change in the organization. Conclusion The discussion is regrading the organizational change in the process. It has been seen that there is a need in the change of using the ICT for VAGO. In order to implement the change in the organization the management of the organization is adopting the Kottel’s 8 step model. It can be said through the use of this model and the adaptation of the VAL IT framework has been used in the process. It can be said from the above discussion that with the use of the proper monitoring process and the following of the implementation stages the adaptation of the change in the management is possible.
9 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS References Abbasnejad,B.,Nepal,M.andDrogemuller,R.,2016.Keyenablersforeffective management of BIM implementation in construction firms. InProceedings of the CIB World Building Congress 2016: Volume I-Creating built environments of new opportunities(Vol. 1, pp. 622-633). TUT–Tampere University of Technology. Asnan, R., Nordin, N. and Othman, S.N., 2015. Managing change on lean implementation in service sector.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,211, pp.313-319. Carnall, C., 2018.Managing change. Routledge. de Almeida, J.P.L., Galina, S.V.R., Grande, M.M. and Brum, D.G., 2017. Lean thinking: planningandimplementationinthepublicsector.InternationalJournalofLeanSix Sigma,8(4), pp.390-410. Georgalis,J.,Samaratunge,R.,Kimberley,N.andLu,Y.,2015.Changeprocess characteristics and resistance to organisational change: The role of employee perceptions of justice.Australian Journal of Management,40(1), pp.89-113. Hammer, M., 2015. What is business process management?. InHandbook on business process management 1(pp. 3-16). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Holten, A.L. and Brenner, S.O., 2015. Leadership style and the process of organizational change.Leadership & Organization Development Journal,36(1), pp.2-16. Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change managementisnowanecessity.InternationalJournalofProjectManagement,33(2), pp.291-298.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10 CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS Leischnig, A., Ivens, B.S., Niersbach, B. and Pardo, C., 2018. Mind the gap: A process model for diagnosing barriers to key account management implementation.Industrial Marketing Management,70, pp.58-67. Lřnvik, S.B., Pettersen, I.N. and Verhulst, E., 2016. Achieving Readiness for Change for SuccessfulImplementationofServiceDesignProjects:LearningfromChange Management.DS 85-1: Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Volume 1, Trondheim, Norway, 10th-12th August 2016, pp.002-011. Muzanenhamo, G.N., Allen-lle, C., Adams, A. and Iwu, C.G., 2016. The relationship among changeimplementation,job satisfactionandorganizationalcitizenshipbehaviorin the Business Process Outsourcing industry in South Africa. Nordin, N. and Deros, B.M., 2017. Organisational change framework for lean manufacturing implementation.International Journal of Supply Chain Management,6(3), pp.309-320. Omidi, A. and Khoshtinat, B., 2016. Factors affecting the implementation of business process reengineering: taking into account the moderating role of organizational culture (Case Study: Iran Air).Procedia Economics and Finance,36, pp.425-432. Pan, G., Pan, S.L. and Lim, C.Y., 2015. Managing Fit between Organizational Functionality, PackageFeaturesandStakeholderNeedsduringEnterpriseAccountingSystems Implementation: A Process Analysis.Accountancy Business and the Public Interest. Stark, J., 2015. Product lifecycle management. InProduct lifecycle management (Volume 1)(pp. 1-29). Springer, Cham. vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S. and Schmiedel, T., 2016. On the role of context in business process management.International Journal of Information Management,36(3), pp.486-495.