COURSEPROFESSORCITY DATE CHANGING DEPRECIATION METHODS
IntroductionIAS 16 and AASB 116 usually handles plant, property as well as equipment revaluation,It also enhance recognition and give some guiding standards that should be followed by an entity while making some disclosures linked with the assets. In this scenario, some of Marion’s actions were in line with the AIS 16/AASB 116 whilst others were contrary (Del Giudice, Manganelli & De Paola 2016).
Whether Marion’s Actions were in line with IAS 16/AASB 116 Requirements?To start with, Marion’s actions were in line with paragraphs 29 to 66 of the AIS 16/AASB 116 which are said to deal with measurements after asset recognition. Such is action is evident in Marion case where Marion decided to make some variations to the depreciation technique used by this firm. This was the case since Marion ensured that the depreciation technique is adjusted.Besides, Marion is said to have complied with IAS 16 requirements as she changed depreciation technique which was being utilized in reflecting the patterns of future expected benefits within the entity. Similar section calls the entity to make some reviews of residual values of a particular asset, after revaluation every year (Stunguriene & Christauskas 2014).
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.