Child Labour: For and Against Banning in Supply Chain
Verified
Added on 2022/11/28
|6
|1285
|260
AI Summary
This report discusses the arguments for and against banning child labour in the supply chain. It explores the exploitation of children, the issue of child trafficking, and the reasons for supporting child labour in specific circumstances. The report provides insights into the necessity and impact of child labour.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Child labour
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3 FOR CHILD LABOUR BANNING...........................................................................................3 AGAINST CHILD LABOUR BANNING.................................................................................4 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
INTRODUCTION Child labour refers to the children exploitation in the form of work which creates depriveschildrenfromtheirchildhoodwhichisharmfulfortheirmentalandphysical development. Child labour refers to work which includes physically,mentally,morally and socially dangerous or harmful for their growth and development.There are different argument related with child labour and their causewhichare against the child labour while some people support child labour in some specific circumstances.In this report,there is discussion about for and against banningeveryform of child labour in supply chain(MAKINDE, (2019)). MAIN BODY FOR CHILD LABOUR BANNING Many people have their specific argument related with child labour. There is need to identify the reason of child labour and provide enough solution. This canhelp to banning of child labour within supply chain.There are different argument for banning all form of child labour within supply chain. Exploitation of children In thesupply chain,there is high level of exploitation of children as a human labour. This is the one which should be banned or avoided because children have the right to live their standard life of get education,healthy food and so on.Exploitation is the one through which Businessman take advantage of poverty of children for their work to make profit. This is the one through which children get exposed to avoidable, harmfuland chemical substances which can have direct negative impact on their health and can impact on physical and mental health. Exploitation should be stop because there is no any minimum wages or sufficient pay for children's. Employertake benefit of the their helplessness which can create high profit to complete the work in very low wages. This creates under Payment situation and through this exploitation is done byemployerwithin supply chain.Exploitation is not legal and should be stopped anyhow. So,it can be said that they need to stop the exploitation of children as a child labour in supply chain which can create difficulty for children with negative impact on their mental andphysical health along with underpayment of the labour charge(De Stefano, (2017)). Child trafficking
Due to minimum wages and lower labour charge create the opportunity for any business organization tohirechildren. Because they are the one who charge very less for the work and business get high benefit from spending very less fund for labour charge.Due to high demand of child labour,there is child trafficking withcreates highdifficulty for children to staying their standard life and create the situation of child trafficking.Due to increase in child trafficking,this create a difficulty for children to spend their standard life. Child trafficking create negative impact on children life and force them tospend their lifein poverty and leave lower level of life. Thisis not acceptable and needs to be finish the child trafficking. Due to demand,there is always a supply. So,there is need to finish the demand which can create outcome as a stopping of child trafficking. So,it can be said that there is a need forbanningchild labour which can help to create avoiding of child trafficking and provide standard life to children(Von Broembsen, (2018)). Such are the reason due to which there is need to banning of child labour for providing better opportunity for spending better life. AGAINST CHILD LABOUR BANNING There are many reason for child labour due to which it should be legal in some specific circumstances. There are some of the specific circumstances for which there is need for child labour which is going to be discussed further Supporting family There are many family who lives under poverty and are not able to get income for spending standard life. This is the one of the main reason which lead to create chance of child labour. Due to poverty, parents are helpless and like to send their children to work which can help them to earn some money for spending their life to purchase needy things like food, clothes etc. It is highly difficult to spend their life without earning a single day. They are daily earning worker who work for their food to survive. Children labour for earning some money can help them and their family to have food for that day. This is one of the main reason which lead to create child labour and there are many families with poverty are needed for child labour. Such type of argument support the child labour because through this, children can survive themselves and make survive their families too (Mustafa,(2020)). Trying to live standard life
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Education is costly and poor are not able to afford such education and due to this, they are not able to get enough education to understand the things nearby them. This create the chance of poverty and not able to give enough information related with any thing. Due to this, they are free and not to do anything which allows them to work. Due to vulnerable and poor life they like to earn money which can help them to get rid of poverty and dream to spending a standard life. This dream of living standard life make them to work for earning sufficient money and their work is known as child labour. Children work for making their life better instead of staying poor and live in poverty and struggling for daily food. This is the reason due to which there is need for child labour with some strict rules and regulation which employer need to follow. This can help to provide enough wages for their work in which can help children to spend standard life (Clark, (2018)). CONCLUSION From the above discussion, it can be concluded that there are different type of people who are in favour and against of child labour banning which can associated with different arguments. There are different argument in the favour and against of child labour banning. These can provide enough information and to understand the reason and the necessity of child labour.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Clark,(2018).WorkinBritain'sinformaleconomy:learningfromroad‐sidehandcar washes.British Journal of Industrial Relations,56(2), 320-341. De Stefano, (2017). Non-standard work and limits on freedom of association: A human rights- based approach.Industrial Law Journal,46(2), 185-207. MAKINDE,(2019).UnemploymentinNigeria.IlorinJournalofAdministrationand Development,5(2), 71-77. Mustafa,(2020). Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on education.International Journal of Health Preferences Research, 1-12. Von Broembsen, (2018). Constitutionalizing labour rights: Informal homeworkers in global valuechains.InternationalJournalofComparativeLabourLawandIndustrial Relations,34(3).