This report discusses the different types of inequalities in child oral health, including socio-economic and geographic factors, and provides interventions to address them.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Inequalities in child oral health
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................1 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................3 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4
INTRODUCTION Dental anxiety refers to the fear or any stress which are associated with a dental setting which includes getting scared of delaying in dental treatment. Oral health inequalities refer to the differences which are associated with the consumption of non-milk extrinsic sugars along with fluoridated toothpaste. Social inequality consists of different areas in sociology which focus on the distribution of goods as well as the burden on society. There is increasing social inequality in oral health care of the child (Aguiar, Pattussi and Celeste, 2018). It can be due to different reasons which create a negative impact on the health of people.In this report, includesdifferent typesofinequalityforchildoralhealth.Moreover,itconsistsofdifferentoralhealth interventions for public health. MAIN BODY Oral health refers to the health which includes gums, teeth, or the entire facial system which includes a smile, chewing and speaking(Clarke and Stevens, 2019). It is essential for the health as well as the well-being of a person as oral health provides support to older people to be independent for a longer period and also to recover from the crisis. Poor oral health creates a negative impact on the life of a person as it can cause infection and pain which can lead to difficulty in sleeping, eating, well-being and also in socializing. It has been observed that there is improvementin the oral health of adults and children in England but at same time, there is inequality occurring in the context of oral health. Dental services offered in England are funded through NHS or private organizations. The availability of different dental services in NHS is based on a provision in the year 2006 but when dentists can set up proper practices in dental care wherever chosen by them (Heilmann, Machuca Vargas and Watt, 2021). But after that, there are contractual changes occur and patients are only maintaining formal relationships with dentists when they are underdoing treatment. It is an attempt made for purpose of reducing inequalities and in this, NHS services are free for patients who understand 18 and are in full-time education. There are mainly different types of oral health inequalities that may include regional, district and national inequalities. This can help to get better and more effective responses toward oral health. In the year 2013, the child dental health survey reflects that among different children, self- reported problems of oral health, as well as its impact, are different from the socioeconomic 1
position. Some children aged between 12 to 15 years who are eligible in school to get free meals are feeling toothache for last three months (Kalash, 2020). These 12 years old children also facing problems like gum bleeding and swollen gums in comparison to students who are not eligible for free school meals. 15-year-old children who are eligible for getting free school meals are also facing oral impact from past three months in comparison to people who are not eligible for free meals. As per NDEP report shows in 2013 that there are around 19% of the child who are of 3 years old lived in around 10% of deprived areas of a country. Among this 10% of areas, only 6% of people who live in deprived areas experience dental crises. Another oral health inequality is in the context of geographic areas as in the year 2013, NDEP report shows that there is a difference in the level of dental crisis experienced by 3-year- old people living in various parts of the country in the year 2013 and among these 8% of people belong from East of England and 16% of people from East Midlands. There is also a difference among the upper tier of local authority from 2% in south Gloucestershire and 34% in Leicester. But in the year 2019, the dental crisis is faced among 5-year-old children across different regions. Among these 18% of people are from South East, 32% in North West and others (Public Health England, 2021). Oral inequality is also occurred due to protected characteristics as oral health outcomes can come in children due to insufficient practices. Due to this, different types of oral diseases and conditions need to be faced by children like cavities, toothache and other things. Dental caries among 3-year-old children are 12% whereas, among 5 years old children, it is 23% (Public Health England, 2014). There are also different types of interventions to be adopted by people to avoid oral health problems. This oral health problem can create a negative impact on the development of children and also cause serious problems for them (Ranasinghe, Kruger and Tennant, 2018). It will also does not allow them to focus on their studies and also create a negative impact over their grades and knowledge management. Some of these interventions recommended are mentioned below: There should be an expansion of sealant delivery to low-income as well as rural schools which will allow them to control dental issues among children. There should not be sharing of food among children who are eligible for free food in schools as it will also transfer bacteria and infection from one another which will create a negative impact on the oral health of people (Ravaghi, Farmer and Quiñonez, 2020). 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
There should be also an increase in the proportion of people to access fluoridated water in order to protect them from tooth problems among children. CONCLUSION From the above-mentioned project report, it can be concluded that social inequality in oral health is creating the biggest problem. It creates a negative impact on the development of the child and does not allow them to focus on their studies. These inequalities occur due to different reasons like socio-economic position, graphic position and also due to other characteristics like age and others. These inequalities create different negative impacts on the development of children and to control it, there are different interventions can be adopted by public health. It consists use of fluoridated water, does not allow people to share food and also with ensuring the expansion of sealant delivery. 3
REFERENCES Books and Journals Aguiar, V.R., Pattussi, M.P. and Celeste, R.K., 2018. The role of municipal public policies in oralhealthsocioeconomicinequalitiesinBrazil:Amultilevelstudy.Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology,46(3), pp.245-250. Clarke, L. and Stevens, C., 2019. Preventing dental caries in children: why improving children's oral health is everybody's business.Paediatrics and Child Health,29(12), pp.536-542. Heilmann, A., Machuca Vargas, C. and Watt, R.G., 2021. Sugar consumption and oral health. InOral Epidemiology(pp. 307-317). Springer, Cham. Kalash, D.A., 2020. How COVID-19 deepens child oral health inequities.The Journal of the American Dental Association,151(9), pp.643-645. Ranasinghe, N., Kruger, E. and Tennant, M., 2018. School Dental Service in Sri Lanka: geo‐ spatial analysis of access to oral health care.International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry,28(5), pp.490-496. Ravaghi, V., Farmer, J. and Quiñonez, C., 2020. Persistent but narrowing oral health care inequalities in Canada from 2001 through 2016.The Journal of the American Dental Association,151(5), pp.349-357. Online PublicHealthEngland(2021);InequalitiesinoralhealthinEngland. <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/970380/Inequalities_in_oral_health_in_England.pdf> Public Health England (2014): Local authorities improving oral health: commissioning better oralhealthforchildrenandyoungpeople. <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/321503/CBOHMaindocumentJUNE2014.pdf> Editorial - Child oral health; is there anything more to know? Ravaghi, Vahid; Salomon Ibarra, Candy; Morris, John. Community Dental Health, Vol. 37, No. 2, 29.05.2020, p. 108- 109.<https://www.cdhjournal.org/issues/37-2-june-2020/1019-editorial-child-oral- health-is-thereanything-more-to-know?downloadarticle=downloadon> 4