logo

(PDF) Critical appraisal of qualitative research

6 Pages1454 Words108 Views
   

Added on  2021-04-16

(PDF) Critical appraisal of qualitative research

   Added on 2021-04-16

ShareRelated Documents
Clinical Appraisal of QualitativeResearch: The views of older people andhealth professionals about dignity inacute hospital care Assessment 1Student Name:Student ID:Subject Name: Critical Appraisal of Qualitative ResearchSubject Code: CNA6721 | Page
(PDF) Critical appraisal of qualitative research_1
Question 3: Research Design appropriateness to the aims of the researchThe scholar adopted qualitative research procedure in order to conduct the study. The studyaimed at analysing views of older patients to obtain dignified care in hospitals. In order toconduct the study, data in form of interview was conducted across 17 wards of London acutehealthcare from 3 hospitals (Tauber-Gilmore, et.al., 2017). The research design was appropriatefor the purpose of data collection and arriving at conclusion related to the study. Research designcan be correlational, descriptive, semi-experimental, review, experimental and meta-analytic innature. The scholar here attempted at evaluating an important field relative to the study, howeverwas not effective in catering to aims and goals of the study. The research design adopted for thestudy was comprehensive but did not include quantitative techniques or testing of hypothesis fordrawing conclusive remarks related to the study. For this study descriptive study is adoptedwhere survey method is followed, for this study. This research design has been effective inachieving aims of the research. However, dignity is a complex concept in itself hence this studyhas been effective in achieving recommendations related to it. Question 4: Recruitment strategy appropriateness to the aims of the researchRecruitment strategy used in this study was appropriate for achieving aims of the research.Patients in the project were asked to participate in the discussion to provide feedback ininformation sheet (Baillie, 2009). Staff interview regarding their treatment to patients wererecruited by snowballing technology. The scholar continued to recruit interviewees till datasaturation was achieved. Each participant to the study was asked permission prior to their takingpart in the rese arch procedure. Moreover, all participants to the study were asked questions at2 | Page
(PDF) Critical appraisal of qualitative research_2
their convenience and within their convenient locations. As patients were interviewed besidetheir bed at their suitable timing. Staffs were asked questions when they were in staff offices. Question 5: Data collected appropriateness to the research issueData collection process used by the scholar was conducted in a manner such that the researchissue can be attended. Data that was collected form patients was done so at their convenience intheir rooms bedside as they requested (Tadd, et.al., 2011). Staffs during the process of datacollection were interviewed in their private offices and not in any public space. Priorappointment with permission was obtained from patients and staffs which suited with the themeof the study. As the primary focus of the study was to understand dignity of patients, thereforethis way was an appropriate method in data collection. Question 8: Data analysis being sufficiently rigorous The data analysis method adopted for this study is qualitative research procedure. The datacollected by the study was sufficiently all rigorous in nature, the scholar had selected sample ofparticipants of patients and staffs from across all departments. The participants in the studyreadily accepted and acknowledged to participate and provide feedback, which is the reason thatsufficiently rigorous involved. The study moreover included data from each ward of patientsacross hospitals in London, which was sufficiently rigorous for the scholar to collect. Questionsasked by the scholar were cove red almost all aspect related to dignity in care. However, dataanalysis procedure adopted for the study was only qualitative in nature. Which proves that3 | Page
(PDF) Critical appraisal of qualitative research_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Critical Review of Qualitative Research on Dignity in Acute Care Environment for Older Patients
|6
|1743
|439

Critical Appraisal of a Qualitative Research on Dignity in Acute Hospital Care
|8
|2027
|118

Critically appraising qualitative research PDF
|9
|1913
|165

Critical Appraisal of Paper
|12
|2513
|333

Assessment - Qualitative Research | Moral Resilience
|8
|1803
|18

Answers to Research Questions - the Aim of the Research
|7
|1573
|26