CLWM4000 Business & Corporations Law

This assignment analyzes a business and corporations law case involving Jason, a supplier who breached the Australian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010) by inserting a waiver clause into a purchase agreement with Chong, a consumer. The analysis focuses on whether Jason violated consumer protection provisions, particularly regarding the right to seek redress under the Act and the implied guarantees of quality and fitness for purpose.  The assignment concludes that Jason was liable for breaching consumer law due to his actions.

Solved assignment on Australian Consumer Law, exploring a case study involving breach of contract and consumer rights.

[PDF] Australian Consumer Law Case Study

Breach of Consumer Law in Business

This business law assignment examines the legality of waiver clauses in contracts, focusing specifically on the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). The case study analyzes whether a defendant's inclusion of a waiver clause infringing upon consumer rights under the Australian Consumer Law constitutes a legal breach.  The assignment delves into relevant legislation, applies the rules to the given scenario, and concludes with the defendant's liability for prosecution.

Waiver Clauses and Consumer Law

This assignment analyzes a case study involving Jason and Chong concerning a potential waiver of consumer rights under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). The analysis explores whether Chong effectively waived his consumer protection rights by signing a purchase agreement containing a waiver clause, considering the circumstances surrounding the agreement's execution.  The assignment concludes that Chong's alleged waiver is invalid due to potential fraud and lack of understanding on Jason's part.

Consumer Law and Waiver Agreements

This assignment analyzes a case study where a defendant advertised an old truck as new, violating the provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. It explores the legal principles of deceptive representations and misleading conduct under Australian law, applying them to the specific facts of the case.  The analysis concludes that the defendant's actions constitute a breach of law, leading to potential penalties.

Advertising Misrepresentation Case Study

This assignment examines a legal case involving Chong, who purchased a truck for his construction business. The central issue is whether Chong qualifies as a 'consumer' under the Australian Consumer Law.  The analysis delves into relevant provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, particularly Schedule 2 (Cth) s 3(1)(c), and Section 4B to determine Chong's legal standing. Ultimately, the assignment concludes that Chong meets the definition of a consumer under the Australian Consumer Law and is therefore protected by its provisions.

Consumer Rights Under Australian Law

In this case, Airbus cannot rely on the exclusion clause in their contract with Qantas due to section 64 of the Act, which states that any attempt to exclude liability for conditions and warranties is void. This is supported by case law such as Trade Practice Commission v Radio World Pty Ltd. Therefore, Qantas has the right to claim loss suffered due to the breach of condition. Similarly, in another issue, Frank, an employer, has the right to take legal action against Gemma, one of his employees, for serious misconduct and vicariously liable towards Angela for Bob's actions.

Vicarious Liability of Employer for Employee's Misconduct

Report

The assignment content discusses business laws, specifically focusing on consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The first question addresses whether Riviera can claim a refund and compensation from QB4 for faulty Tetra bikes that injured her child. It is concluded that Riviera has a right to claim under the rules of consumer guarantees. The second question explores whether PMSC can terminate a contract through frustration, citing examples such as Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3. It is concluded that PMSC can terminate the contract and Nicky is entitled to receive compensation of $800.

Breach of Consumer Law in Business

End of preview

Waiver Clauses and Consumer Law

Consumer Law and Waiver Agreements

Advertising Misrepresentation Case Study

Consumer Rights Under Australian Law

Vicarious Liability of Employer for Employee's Misconduct

Business Laws

Breach of Consumer Law in Business

End of preview

Waiver Clauses and Consumer Lawlg...

Consumer Law and Waiver Agreementslg...

Advertising Misrepresentation Case Studylg...

Consumer Rights Under Australian Lawlg...

Vicarious Liability of Employer for Employee's Misconductlg...

Business Lawslg...

Waiver Clauses and Consumer Law

Consumer Law and Waiver Agreements

Advertising Misrepresentation Case Study

Consumer Rights Under Australian Law

Vicarious Liability of Employer for Employee's Misconduct

Business Laws